Suppr超能文献

人类研究伦理的哲学基础。

Philosophical Foundations of Human Research Ethics.

出版信息

Perspect Biol Med. 2022;65(3):499-513. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2022.0040.

Abstract

In his book For the Common Good: Philosophical Foundations of Research Ethics (2022), Alex John London argues that the current framework for human research ethics and oversight is an assortment of rules, procedures, and guidelines built upon mistaken assumptions, policies, and practices that create spurious dilemmas and serious moral failings. He claims that his theory can fix these problems by placing human participant research on a solid philosophical foundation. London argues that human participant research is a social activity guided by principles of justice, in which free and equal individuals work together to promote the common good. This review essay analyzes London's approach to the foundations of human research ethics. Although London's theory of human research ethics is excessively idealistic, his book succeeds in showing why it is necessary to expand the scope of human research ethics beyond its current confines to adequately deal with questions of intranational and international justice.

摘要

在他的著作《为了共同利益:研究伦理的哲学基础》(2022 年)中,亚历克斯·约翰·伦敦认为,当前的人类研究伦理和监督框架是一系列建立在错误假设、政策和实践基础上的规则、程序和准则,这些假设、政策和实践制造了虚假的困境和严重的道德缺陷。他声称,他的理论可以通过将人类参与者研究置于坚实的哲学基础上来解决这些问题。伦敦认为,人类参与者研究是一种由正义原则指导的社会活动,其中自由和平等的个体共同努力促进共同利益。这篇评论文章分析了伦敦对人类研究伦理基础的方法。尽管伦敦的人类研究伦理理论过于理想化,但他的书成功地表明了为什么有必要将人类研究伦理的范围扩大到当前的界限之外,以充分处理国内和国际正义问题。

相似文献

1
Philosophical Foundations of Human Research Ethics.
Perspect Biol Med. 2022;65(3):499-513. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2022.0040.
2
Justice in health care: the contribution of Edmund Pellegrino.
J Med Philos. 1990 Jun;15(3):269-87. doi: 10.1093/jmp/15.3.269.
5
Deontological foundations for medical ethics?
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 May 4;290(6478):1331-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6478.1331.
6
Consequentialism, reasons, value and justice.
Bioethics. 1998 Jul;12(3):212-35. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00109.
7
Locating the Source(s) of the Social Value Requirement(s).
Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Nov;48(6):33-35. doi: 10.1002/hast.935.
8
Rawls and research on cognitively impaired patients: a reply to Maio.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2003;24(5):381-93; discussion 395-406. doi: 10.1023/b:meta.0000006823.03739.e3.
9
Is there a moral duty to die?
Health Care Anal. 2001;9(1):41-63. doi: 10.1023/A:1011355028021.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Social value, clinical equipoise, and research in a public health emergency.
Bioethics. 2019 Mar;33(3):326-334. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12467. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
3
A non-paternalistic model of research ethics and oversight: assessing the benefits of prospective review.
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Winter;40(4):930-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00722.x.
4
Research at the auction block: Problems for the fair benefits approach to international research.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2010 Jul-Aug;40(4):34-45. doi: 10.1353/hcr.0.0281.
5
The clinical investigator-subject relationship: a contextual approach.
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2009 Dec 3;4:16. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-4-16.
6
Two dogmas of research ethics and the integrative approach to human-subjects research.
J Med Philos. 2007 Mar-Apr;32(2):99-116. doi: 10.1080/03605310701255727.
9
Ethics. Fair benefits for research in developing countries.
Science. 2002 Dec 13;298(5601):2133-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1076899.
10
What makes placebo-controlled trials unethical?
Am J Bioeth. 2002 Spring;2(2):3-9. doi: 10.1162/152651602317533523.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验