• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

世界是否准备好迎接 STICH 3.0 试验?

Is the world ready for the STICH 3.0 trial?

机构信息

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation.

Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.

出版信息

Curr Opin Cardiol. 2022 Nov 1;37(6):474-480. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000001000. Epub 2022 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1097/HCO.0000000000001000
PMID:36094455
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is responsible for >50% of heart failures cases. Patients with ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (iLVSD) are known to have poorer outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared to patients with a normal ejection fraction. Nevertheless, <1% of patients in coronary revascularization trials to date had iLVSD. The purpose of this review is to describe coronary revascularization modalities in patients with iLVSD and highlight the need for randomized controlled trial evidence comparing these treatments in this patient population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Network meta-analytic findings of observational studies suggest that PCI is associated with higher rates of mortality, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization but not stroke compared to CABG in iLVSD. In recent years, outcomes for patients undergoing PCI have improved as a result of advances in technologies and techniques.

SUMMARY

The optimal coronary revascularization modality in patients with iLVSD remains unknown. In observational studies, CABG appears superior to PCI; however, direct randomized evidence is absent and developments in PCI techniques have improved post-PCI outcomes in recent years. The Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure 3.0 consortium of trials will seek to address the clinical equipoise in coronary revascularization in patients with iLVSD.

摘要

目的综述

冠心病(CAD)是导致 >50%心力衰竭病例的原因。与射血分数正常的患者相比,有缺血性左心室收缩功能障碍(iLVSD)的患者在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后预后更差。然而,迄今为止,在冠状动脉血运重建试验中,仅有 <1%的患者患有 iLVSD。本文旨在描述 iLVSD 患者的冠状动脉血运重建方式,并强调需要随机对照试验证据来比较这些治疗方法在该患者人群中的疗效。

最新发现

来自观察性研究的网络荟萃分析结果表明,与 CABG 相比,iLVSD 患者接受 PCI 治疗后死亡率、心脏性死亡、心肌梗死和再次血运重建的发生率更高,但卒中发生率无差异。近年来,由于技术和技术的进步,接受 PCI 治疗的患者的预后得到了改善。

总结

iLVSD 患者的最佳冠状动脉血运重建方式仍不清楚。在观察性研究中,CABG 似乎优于 PCI;然而,目前缺乏直接的随机证据,近年来 PCI 技术的发展改善了 PCI 后的预后。缺血性心力衰竭 3.0 期手术治疗联盟的试验将旨在解决 iLVSD 患者冠状动脉血运重建的临床平衡点。

相似文献

1
Is the world ready for the STICH 3.0 trial?世界是否准备好迎接 STICH 3.0 试验?
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2022 Nov 1;37(6):474-480. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000001000. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
2
STICH3C: Rationale and Study Protocol.STICH3C:研究原理和方案。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Aug;16(8):e012527. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012527. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
3
Coronary revascularization for patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.冠状动脉血运重建术治疗严重左心室功能障碍患者。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Dec;96(6):2038-44. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.06.052. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
4
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在冠状动脉血运重建中的比较:一项系统评价。
JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2086-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281718.
5
Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. coronary artery bypass grafting for left main revascularization: an updated meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干血运重建:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2017 Jul 1;3(3):173-182. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx008.
6
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction.左心室收缩功能障碍患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2021 Jun;35(3):575-585. doi: 10.1007/s10557-020-07063-0. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
7
Treatment strategies in ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction: a network meta-analysis.缺血性左心室功能不全的治疗策略:一项网状荟萃分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Oct 21. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa319.
8
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较:外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
9
Clinical outcomes with percutaneous coronary revascularization vs coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of 6 randomized trials and 4,686 patients.无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉血运重建与冠状动脉旁路移植术的临床结局:6项随机试验和4686例患者的荟萃分析
Am Heart J. 2017 Aug;190:54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 18.
10
The Current State of Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的现状。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2018 Jan 17;20(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s11883-018-0705-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Myocardial Revascularization in Patients with Diabetes and Heart Failure-A Narrative Review.糖尿病合并心力衰竭患者的心肌血运重建——一项叙述性综述
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Apr 5;26(7):3398. doi: 10.3390/ijms26073398.
2
Coronary Artery Disease Doubles Excess Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.冠心病使射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的额外死亡率增加一倍。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 6;14(9):e037915. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037915. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
3
Temporal Trend in Revascularization for Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.
缺血性心肌病合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者血运重建的时间趋势
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Feb 6;13(3):e032212. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032212. Epub 2024 Jan 19.