Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Nov 1;176(11):1084-1097. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.3172.
Adequate sleep duration is necessary for many aspects of child health, development, and well-being, yet sleep durations for children are declining, and effective strategies to increase sleep in healthy children remain to be elucidated.
To determine whether nonpharmaceutical interventions to improve sleep duration in healthy children are effective and to identify the key components of these interventions.
CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core collection, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO trials databases were searched from inception to November 15, 2021.
Randomized clinical trials of interventions to improve sleep duration in healthy children were independently screened by 2 researchers. A total of 28 478 studies were identified.
Data were processed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Random-effects meta-analytic models were used to estimate pooled effect sizes.
Difference in sleep duration, measured in minutes.
A total of 13 539 child participants from 45 randomized clinical trials were included. Of these, 6897 (50.9%) were in the intervention group and 6642 (49.1%) in the control group, and the mean age ranged from 18 months to 19 years. Pooled results indicate that sleep interventions were associated with 10.5 minutes (95% CI, 5.6-15.4) longer nocturnal sleep duration. There was substantial variation between trials. Sources of variation that were not associated with the study effect size included age group, whether the population was identified as having a sleep problem or being at a socioeconomic disadvantage (eg, coming from a low-income family or area), method of assessment of sleep duration (objective vs subjective), location of intervention delivery (home vs school), whether interventions were delivered in person or used parental involvement, whether behavioral theory was used, environmental change, or had greater or lower intensity. Interventions that included earlier bedtimes were associated with a 47-minute sleep extension (95% CI, 18.9-75.0; 3 trials) compared with remaining studies (7.4 minutes; 95% CI, 2.9-11.8; 42 trials) (P = .006 for group difference). Trials of shorter duration (6 months or less) had larger effects.
Interventions focused on earlier bedtimes may offer a simple, pragmatic, effective way to meaningfully increase sleep duration that could have important benefits for child health.
充足的睡眠时间对儿童的健康、发育和幸福感至关重要,但儿童的睡眠时间正在减少,而有效增加健康儿童睡眠时间的策略仍有待阐明。
确定改善健康儿童睡眠时间的非药物干预措施是否有效,并确定这些干预措施的关键组成部分。
CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、Web of Science 核心合集、ClinicalTrials.gov 和世卫组织试验数据库从成立到 2021 年 11 月 15 日进行了搜索。
两名研究人员独立筛选了改善健康儿童睡眠时间的干预措施的随机临床试验。共确定了 28478 项研究。
根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目 (PRISMA) 报告准则处理数据。使用随机效应荟萃分析模型估计汇总效果大小。
睡眠时间差异,以分钟为单位测量。
共有来自 45 项随机临床试验的 13539 名儿童参与者被纳入研究。其中,6897 名(50.9%)参与者在干预组,6642 名(49.1%)参与者在对照组,平均年龄从 18 个月到 19 岁不等。汇总结果表明,睡眠干预措施与夜间睡眠时间延长 10.5 分钟(95%置信区间,5.6-15.4)相关。试验之间存在很大差异。与研究效果大小无关的变异源包括年龄组、人群是否被确定为存在睡眠问题或处于社会经济劣势(例如,来自低收入家庭或地区)、睡眠持续时间评估方法(客观与主观)、干预措施实施地点(家庭与学校)、干预措施是否亲自实施或利用家长参与、是否使用行为理论、环境变化或强度更高或更低。包括提前就寝时间的干预措施与延长 47 分钟睡眠时间相关(95%置信区间,18.9-75.0;3 项试验),而其余研究则延长 7.4 分钟睡眠时间(95%置信区间,2.9-11.8;42 项试验)(差异有统计学意义,P = .006)。持续时间较短(6 个月或更短)的试验效果更大。
专注于提前就寝时间的干预措施可能提供一种简单、务实、有效的方法,可显著增加睡眠时间,这对儿童健康可能具有重要意义。