• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行政区划调整是否促进低碳城市发展?来自中国“撤县设区”的实证证据。

Does Administrative Division Adjustment promote low-carbon city development? Empirical evidence from the "Revoke County to Urban District" in China.

作者信息

Li Xiangyang, Wang Lei

机构信息

Institute of Central China Development, Wuhan University, 430072, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.

Institute of Regional and Urban-Rural Development, Wuhan University, 430072, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(5):11542-11561. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22653-1. Epub 2022 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-22653-1
PMID:36094705
Abstract

The carbon emission reduction in city regions as a result of the optimization of urban spatial layout is crucial for combating global warming and has garnered widespread attention in recent years. There is little evidence, however, that a specific spatial optimization technique has a substantial effect on urban spatial layout and carbon dioxide (CO) emissions. As an effective tool of hierarchical network governance in China, Administrative Division Adjustment (ADA) has the potential to achieve this goal, due to its redistributive effects on urban space resources. Therefore, we utilize the "Revoke County to Urban District" (CTD)-one of the common and typical ADA policies-as a case study to examine its environmental implications, based on the mediation mechanism of urban spatial layout. The empirical results from a panel dataset of 285 prefecture-level and above cities in China indicate that the CTD will reduce urban CO emissions, especially in low administrative levels (low-rank), non-resource based (RB), non-key environmental protection (KEP), midwestern and northwestern cities. And the additional mediation mechanisms demonstrate that the environmental benefits of the CTD in China are attributed to the optimization of urban spatial layout, which reduces CO emissions by improving public transportation and limiting urban sprawl.

摘要

城市地区通过优化城市空间布局实现的碳排放减少对于应对全球变暖至关重要,近年来受到了广泛关注。然而,几乎没有证据表明特定的空间优化技术会对城市空间布局和二氧化碳(CO₂)排放产生实质性影响。作为中国分级网络治理的有效工具,行政区划调整(ADA)因其对城市空间资源的再分配作用而有潜力实现这一目标。因此,我们以“撤县设区”(CTD)——一种常见且典型的ADA政策——为例,基于城市空间布局的中介机制来研究其环境影响。来自中国285个地级及以上城市面板数据集的实证结果表明,撤县设区将减少城市CO₂排放,尤其是在低行政级别(低等级)、非资源型(RB)、非重点环境保护(KEP)、中西部和西北部城市。额外的中介机制表明,中国撤县设区的环境效益归因于城市空间布局的优化,这通过改善公共交通和限制城市蔓延来减少CO₂排放。

相似文献

1
Does Administrative Division Adjustment promote low-carbon city development? Empirical evidence from the "Revoke County to Urban District" in China.行政区划调整是否促进低碳城市发展?来自中国“撤县设区”的实证证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(5):11542-11561. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22653-1. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
2
Development zone policy and urban carbon emissions: empirical evidence from the construction of national high-tech industrial development zones in China.开发区政策与城市碳排放:来自中国国家高新技术产业开发区建设的经验证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(18):52241-52265. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26025-1. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
3
How does urbanization affect carbon emission intensity under a hierarchical nesting structure? Empirical research on the China Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration.城镇化如何在层次嵌套结构下影响碳排放强度?基于中国长江三角洲城市群的实证研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Nov;26(31):31770-31785. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06361-x. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
4
Spatial Heterogeneity of Carbon Emissions and Its Influencing Factors in China: Evidence from 286 Prefecture-Level Cities.中国碳排放的空间异质性及其影响因素:来自 286 个地级市的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 22;19(3):1226. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031226.
5
How does transportation infrastructure affect urban carbon emissions? an empirical study based on 286 cities in China.交通基础设施如何影响城市碳排放?基于中国 286 个城市的实证研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(4):10624-10642. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22866-4. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
6
Research on the Heterogeneity of Carbon Emissions under the Government's Promotion of Urban Agglomeration Development: Empirical Evidence from County-to-District Reforms.政府推动城市群发展下的碳排放异质性研究——以县改区改革为例的实证证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 20;19(12):7540. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127540.
7
Spatial Evolutionary Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Urban Industrial Carbon Emission in China.中国城市工业碳排放的空间演进特征及影响因素
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 7;19(18):11227. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811227.
8
The influence of urban form compactness on CO emissions and its threshold effect: Evidence from cities in China.城市形态紧凑性对 CO 排放的影响及其阈值效应:来自中国城市的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Nov 15;322:116032. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116032. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
9
Can e-commerce reduce urban CO emissions? Evidence from National E-commerce Demonstration Cities policy in China.电子商务能减少城市碳排放吗?来自中国国家电子商务示范城市政策的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(20):58553-58568. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26657-3. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
10
Assessing the low-carbon city pilot policy on carbon emission from consumption and production in China: how underlying mechanism and spatial spillover effect?评估中国低碳城市试点政策对消费和生产碳排放的影响:潜在机制和空间溢出效应如何?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(47):71958-71977. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21005-3. Epub 2022 May 24.