• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基准绩效指标的事实与谬误。

Facts and Fallacy of Benchmark Performance Indicators.

机构信息

Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Sheikh Zayed 6107 1800 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Sheikh Zayed 6107 1800 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/elliotthaut.

出版信息

Adv Surg. 2022 Sep;56(1):89-109. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2022.03.002.

DOI:10.1016/j.yasu.2022.03.002
PMID:36096580
Abstract

Efforts to improve quality in healthcare have arisen from the recognition that the quality of care delivered and resulting outcomes are highly variable. Performance benchmarking using high-quality data to compare risk-adjusted outcomes between hospitals and surgeons has been widely adopted as one means for addressing this problem. In this article we discuss the history, current state, methodologies, and potential pitfalls of benchmarking efforts to improve quality of healthcare in the United States.

摘要

提高医疗保健质量的努力源于人们认识到所提供的护理质量和结果高度可变。使用高质量数据进行绩效基准测试,以比较医院和外科医生之间的风险调整结果,已被广泛采用作为解决这一问题的一种手段。本文讨论了在美国提高医疗保健质量的基准测试工作的历史、现状、方法学和潜在陷阱。

相似文献

1
Facts and Fallacy of Benchmark Performance Indicators.基准绩效指标的事实与谬误。
Adv Surg. 2022 Sep;56(1):89-109. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2022.03.002.
2
Improving surgical outcomes through benchmarking.通过基准测试提高手术效果。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jan;106(1):59-64. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10976. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
3
The Impact of Quality Variations on Patients Undergoing Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database Study.质量变化对接受肾细胞癌手术患者的影响:国家癌症数据库研究。
Eur Urol. 2017 Sep;72(3):379-386. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.033. Epub 2017 May 13.
4
Benchmarking patient outcomes.对患者治疗结果进行基准比对。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2001;33(2):185-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00185.x.
5
Is there hospital variation in long-term incisional hernia repair after abdominal surgery?腹部手术后长期切口疝修补术在不同医院之间存在差异吗?
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Mar;220(3):313-322.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.11.011. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
6
Health services research related to performance indicators and benchmarking in Europe.欧洲与绩效指标和基准相关的卫生服务研究。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Jul;16 Suppl 2:38-47. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011042.
7
Using benchmarking to support performance improvement efforts.利用标杆管理来支持绩效改进工作。
J AHIMA. 1998 Nov-Dec;69(10):26-8.
8
Association of Hospital Participation in a Regional Trauma Quality Improvement Collaborative With Patient Outcomes.医院参与区域创伤质量改进协作与患者结局的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Aug 1;153(8):747-756. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0985.
9
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database: 2017 Update on Outcomes and Quality.胸外科医师协会成人心脏手术数据库:2017年结局与质量更新
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Jan;103(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
10
Achievable benchmarks of care: the ABCs of benchmarking.可实现的护理基准:基准测试的基础知识。
J Eval Clin Pract. 1999 Aug;5(3):269-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1999.00203.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Inpatient falls and pressure ulcers as nursing quality indicators in national benchmarking-a retrospective observational registry study.住院患者跌倒和压疮作为国家基准化中的护理质量指标——一项回顾性观察性登记研究
Int J Qual Health Care. 2025 Jul 4;37(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf055.
2
Advanced and alternative research methods for the acute care surgeon scientist.急症外科医生科学家的先进和替代研究方法。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Feb 21;9(1):e001320. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001320. eCollection 2024.
3
Unlocking the Power of Benchmarking: Real-World-Time Data Analysis for Enhanced Sarcoma Patient Outcomes.
解锁基准测试的力量:用于改善肉瘤患者预后的真实世界数据分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 2;15(17):4395. doi: 10.3390/cancers15174395.