• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同镇静深度下结肠镜检查对不同结肠部位腺瘤检出率的比较。

Comparison of adenoma detection in different colorectal segments between deep-sedated and unsedated colonoscopy.

机构信息

Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.

First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, No.85 of South Xinjian Road, Yingze District, Taiyuan, 030000, Shanxi, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 12;12(1):15356. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19468-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-19468-y
PMID:36097050
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9468171/
Abstract

To investigate if deep-sedated colonoscopy affects adenoma detection in certain colorectal segment. Review of colonoscopy reports, electronic images and medical records of individuals underwent screening colonoscopy with or without propofol sedation between October 2020 and March 2021 from seven hospitals in China. A total of 4500 individuals were analyzed. There was no significant difference in ADR between deep-sedated colonoscopy and unsedated colonoscopy [45.4% vs. 46.3%, P > 0.05]. The APP of deep-sedated colonoscopy was lower than unsedated colonoscopy (1.76 ± 0.81 vs. 2.00 ± 1.30, P < 0.05). Both average number of adenomas and luminal distention score of splenic flexure and descending colon were lower in deep-sedated colonoscopy (P < 0.05), and average number of adenomas was positively correlated with an improved distension score in splenic flexure and descending colon (splenic flexure r = 0.031, P < 0.05; descending colon r = 0.312, P < 0.05). Linear regression model showed deep-sedated colonoscopy significantly affected luminal distention of splenic flexure and descending colon as well as average number of adenomas detected in splenic flexure (P < 0.05). Deep-sedated colonoscopy decreased adenoma detection in splenic flexure and the luminal distention of splenic flexure and descending colon compared with unsedated colonoscopy.

摘要

目的

研究深度镇静结肠镜检查是否会影响特定结直肠段的腺瘤检出率。

方法

回顾性分析 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 3 月期间,中国 7 家医院行筛查性结肠镜检查且使用或未使用异丙酚镇静的 4500 例患者的结肠镜检查报告、电子图像和病历资料。比较深度镇静与非镇静结肠镜检查的腺瘤检出率(ADR)、深度镇静与非镇静结肠镜检查的腺瘤检测能力(APP),并分析深度镇静结肠镜检查时结肠脾曲和降结肠的扩张程度评分与腺瘤检出数的相关性。

结果

深度镇静与非镇静结肠镜检查的 ADR 差异无统计学意义[45.4%(2062/4500)比 46.3%(2118/4500),P>0.05]。深度镇静组的 APP 低于非镇静组(1.76±0.81 比 2.00±1.30,P<0.05)。深度镇静组结肠脾曲和降结肠的平均腺瘤数和扩张评分均低于非镇静组(P<0.05),且结肠脾曲和降结肠的扩张评分与平均腺瘤数呈正相关(结肠脾曲 r=0.031,P<0.05;降结肠 r=0.312,P<0.05)。线性回归模型显示,深度镇静结肠镜检查显著影响结肠脾曲和降结肠的扩张程度以及结肠脾曲的腺瘤检出数(P<0.05)。

结论

与非镇静结肠镜检查相比,深度镇静结肠镜检查可降低结肠脾曲和降结肠的腺瘤检出率,以及结肠脾曲和降结肠的扩张程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c845/9468171/ba9ae1b59c5f/41598_2022_19468_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c845/9468171/ba9ae1b59c5f/41598_2022_19468_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c845/9468171/ba9ae1b59c5f/41598_2022_19468_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of adenoma detection in different colorectal segments between deep-sedated and unsedated colonoscopy.不同镇静深度下结肠镜检查对不同结肠部位腺瘤检出率的比较。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 12;12(1):15356. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19468-y.
2
Comparison of missed adenomas in deep-sedated and unsedated colonoscopy: A multicenter retrospective study.深度镇静与非镇静结肠镜检查中漏诊腺瘤的比较:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Eur J Intern Med. 2023 Apr;110:48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.01.019. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
3
Factors Associated With Adenoma Detection in Propofol-sedated Patients.丙泊酚镇静患者腺瘤检出率的相关因素。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug;53(7):523-529. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001080.
4
Sedated Colonoscopy may not be Beneficial for Polyp/Adenoma Detection.镇静结肠镜检查可能对息肉/腺瘤的检出无益。
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241272482. doi: 10.1177/10732748241272482.
5
Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy using water exchange, water immersion, and air insufflation.前瞻性多中心随机对照试验比较了水交换、水浸和注气在结肠镜检查中腺瘤检出率。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jul;86(1):192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
6
Dynamic patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal increase adenoma detection: a randomized, crossover trial.结肠镜退镜时动态改变患者体位可增加腺瘤检出率:一项随机交叉试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Mar;73(3):456-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.07.046. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
7
Effect of Dynamic Position Changes on Adenoma Detection During Colonoscope Withdrawal: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial.结肠镜退镜时动态体位改变对腺瘤检出的影响:一项随机对照多中心试验
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;111(1):63-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.354. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
8
Propofol sedation in a colorectal cancer screening outpatient cohort.在结直肠癌筛查门诊队列中使用异丙酚镇静。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2009 Dec;75(12):677-83.
9
Is Unsedated Colonoscopy Gaining Ground Over Sedated Colonoscopy?无镇静结肠镜检查相对于镇静结肠镜检查是否更具优势?
J Natl Med Assoc. 2018 Apr;110(2):143-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Apr 15.
10
A simple method to improve adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: altering patient position.一种提高结肠镜检查时腺瘤检出率的简单方法:改变患者体位。
Can J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep;27(9):509-12. doi: 10.1155/2013/276043.

引用本文的文献

1
Lower adenoma detection rate in anesthesia assisted colonoscopy: a retrospective study.麻醉辅助结肠镜检查中腺瘤检出率较低:一项回顾性研究。
Front Oncol. 2025 Apr 10;15:1571387. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1571387. eCollection 2025.
2
Operation sequence of bidirectional endoscopy with topical anesthesia affected colonoscopy performance: a randomized controlled trial.局部麻醉下双向内镜检查的操作顺序对结肠镜检查性能的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 27;25(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03721-5.
3
Sedated Colonoscopy may not be Beneficial for Polyp/Adenoma Detection.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
2
Guidelines for sedation in gastroenterological endoscopy (second edition).消化内镜镇静指南(第二版)。
Dig Endosc. 2021 Jan;33(1):21-53. doi: 10.1111/den.13882. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
3
Unsedated Colonoscopy: Impact on Quality Indicators.非镇静结肠镜检查:对质量指标的影响。
镇静结肠镜检查可能对息肉/腺瘤的检出无益。
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241272482. doi: 10.1177/10732748241272482.
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Nov;65(11):3116-3122. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06491-0. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
4
Association of second surveillance colonoscopy findings with index and first surveillance colonoscopy results.第二次监测结肠镜检查结果与基线和首次监测结肠镜检查结果的关联。
J Dig Dis. 2020 May;21(5):272-278. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12869.
5
The impact of sedation on quality metrics of colonoscopy: a single-center experience of 48,838 procedures.镇静对结肠镜检查质量指标的影响:单中心 48838 例操作的经验
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jun;35(6):1155-1161. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03586-y. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
6
Effect of dynamic position changes during colonoscope withdrawal: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.结肠镜退镜过程中体位变化的效果:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1171-1181. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07483-x. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
7
Practice recommendations for the use of sedation in routine hospital-based colonoscopy.常规医院结肠镜检查镇静使用的实践建议。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020 Feb 16;7(1):e000348. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000348. eCollection 2020.
8
Optimizing Screening Colonoscopy: Strategies and Alternatives.优化结肠镜筛查:策略与替代方案
Visc Med. 2019 Aug;35(4):215-225. doi: 10.1159/000501835. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
9
Deep sedation and anaesthesia in complex gastrointestinal endoscopy: a joint position statement endorsed by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), Joint Advisory Group (JAG) and Royal College of Anaesthetists (RCoA).复杂胃肠内镜检查中的深度镇静与麻醉:英国胃肠病学会(BSG)、联合咨询小组(JAG)和皇家麻醉师学院(RCoA)认可的联合立场声明
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr;10(2):141-147. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2018-101145. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
10
Factors associated with polyp detection during colonoscopy: A retrospective observational study.结肠镜检查中息肉检出的相关因素:一项回顾性观察研究。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2019 Sep;35(9):572-577. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12090. Epub 2019 Jun 4.