Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 12;12(1):15333. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19662-y.
Patients with Marfan syndrome and related disorders are at risk for aortic dissection and aortic rupture and therefore require appropriate monitoring. Computed tomography (CT) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) are routinely used for initial diagnosis and follow-up. The purpose of this study is to compare whole-heart CT and TTE aortic measurement for initial work-up, 2-year follow-up, and detection of progressive aortic enlargement. This retrospective study included 95 patients diagnosed with Marfan syndrome or a related disorder. All patients underwent initial work-up including aortic diameter measurement using both electrocardiography-triggered whole-heart CT and TTE. Forty-two of these patients did not undergo aortic repair after initial work-up and were monitored by follow-up imaging within 2 years. Differences between the two methods for measuring aortic diameters were compared using Bland-Altman plots. The acceptable clinical limit of agreement (acLOA) for initial work-up, follow-up, and progression within 2 years was predefined as < ± 2 mm. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a small bias of 0.2 mm with wide limits of agreement (LOA) from + 6.3 to - 5.9 mm for the aortic sinus and a relevant bias of - 1.6 mm with wide LOA from + 5.6 to - 8.9 mm for the ascending aorta. Follow-up imaging yielded a small bias of 0.5 mm with a wide LOA from + 6.7 to - 5.8 mm for the aortic sinus and a relevant bias of 1.1 mm with wide LOA from + 8.1 to - 10.2 mm for the ascending aorta. Progressive aortic enlargement at follow-up was detected in 57% of patients using CT and 40% of patients using TTE. Measurement differences outside the acLOA were most frequently observed for the ascending aorta. Whole-heart CT and TTE measurements show good correlation, but the frequency of measurement differences outside the acLOA is high. TTE systematically overestimates aortic diameters. Therefore, whole-heart CT may be preferred for aortic monitoring of patients with Marfan syndrome and related disorders. TTE remains an indispensable imaging tool that provides additional information not available with CT.
马凡综合征及相关疾病患者存在主动脉夹层和主动脉破裂的风险,因此需要进行适当的监测。计算机断层扫描(CT)和经胸超声心动图(TTE)通常用于初始诊断和随访。本研究旨在比较全心 CT 和 TTE 主动脉测量在初始检查、2 年随访和检测主动脉进行性增大中的作用。这项回顾性研究纳入了 95 例诊断为马凡综合征或相关疾病的患者。所有患者均接受初始检查,包括使用心电图触发的全心 CT 和 TTE 测量主动脉直径。其中 42 例患者在初始检查后未进行主动脉修复,并在 2 年内通过随访影像学检查进行监测。使用 Bland-Altman 图比较两种方法测量主动脉直径的差异。将初始检查、随访和 2 年内进展的可接受临床一致性界限(acLOA)定义为 < 2mm。Bland-Altman 分析显示,主动脉窦的平均偏差为 0.2mm,一致性界限(LOA)从+6.3 到-5.9mm,升主动脉的平均偏差为-1.6mm,LOA 从+5.6 到-8.9mm。随访影像学检查显示,主动脉窦的平均偏差为 0.5mm,LOA 从+6.7 到-5.8mm,升主动脉的平均偏差为 1.1mm,LOA 从+8.1 到-10.2mm。使用 CT 检测到 57%的患者在随访时主动脉进行性增大,使用 TTE 检测到 40%的患者主动脉进行性增大。在 acLOA 之外,测量差异最常发生在升主动脉。全心 CT 和 TTE 测量结果具有良好的相关性,但超出 acLOA 的测量差异频率较高。TTE 系统地高估了主动脉直径。因此,对于马凡综合征和相关疾病患者的主动脉监测,可能更倾向于使用全心 CT。TTE 仍然是一种不可或缺的影像学工具,它提供了 CT 无法提供的额外信息。