Suppr超能文献

典型偏头痛和普通偏头痛提示了两种不同疾病的临床证据。

Classic and common migraine suggestive clinical evidence of two separate entities.

作者信息

Manzoni G C, Farina S, Granella F, Alfieri M, Bisi M

出版信息

Funct Neurol. 1986 Apr-Jun;1(2):112-22.

PMID:3609848
Abstract

To help clarify whether or not classic migraine (C1M) and common migraine (CoM) should be considered as a single entity, we compared the clinical features of a group of C1M patients with those of a group of CoM patients. Significant differences between the two forms of migraine were found in the following areas: age distribution of sufferers; family history of migraine, ischemic cerebrovascular disease, and coronary heart disease; age at onset; frequency of attacks; duration, location, and severity of pain; accompanying symptoms; and, evolution during weekends, menstruation, pregnancy, and puerperium. Our comparative investigation suggests that CIM and CoM are more distinct than previously considered.

摘要

为了明确典型偏头痛(C1M)和普通偏头痛(CoM)是否应被视为同一疾病实体,我们比较了一组C1M患者和一组CoM患者的临床特征。在以下方面发现了这两种偏头痛形式之间的显著差异:患者的年龄分布;偏头痛、缺血性脑血管疾病和冠心病的家族史;发病年龄;发作频率;疼痛的持续时间、部位和严重程度;伴随症状;以及在周末、月经、怀孕和产褥期的病情演变。我们的比较研究表明,CIM和CoM比之前认为的更为不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验