Frontier Nursing University, Versailles, Kentucky.
University of Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada.
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2022 Sep;67(5):608-617. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13400. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
The COVID-19 pandemic presented the midwifery workforce with challenges for maintaining access to high-quality care and safety for patients and perinatal care providers. This study analyzed associations between different types of professional autonomy and changes in midwives' employment and compensation during the early months of the pandemic.
An online survey distributed to midwifery practices in fall 2020 compared midwives' employment and compensation in February 2020 and September 2020. Chi-square analysis determined associations between those data and measures of midwives' autonomy: state practice environment, midwifery practice ownership, intrapartum practice setting, and midwifery participation in practice decision-making.
Participants included lead midwives from 727 practices, representing 50 states and the District of Columbia. Full-time equivalent (FTE) positions and number of full-time midwives were stable for 77% of practices, part-time employment for 83%, and salaries for 72%. Of the remaining practices, more practices lost FTE positions, full-time positions, part-time positions, and salary (18%, 15%, 9%, and 18%, respectively) than gained (11%, 8%, 8%, and 9%, respectively). Early retirements and furloughs were experienced by 9% of practices, and 18% lost benefits. However, midwifery practice ownership was significantly associated with increased salaries (20.3% vs 7.1%; P < .001) and decreased loss of benefits (7.8% vs 19.9%; P = .002) and furloughs (3.8 vs 10.1%; P = .04). Community-based practice was significantly associated with increased FTE positions (19.0% vs 8.8%; P = .005), part-time positions (17.4% vs 5.1%; P < .001), and salary (19.7% vs 7.0%; P < .001), as well as decreased loss of benefits (11.5% vs 21.1%; P = .02) and early retirement (1.4% vs 6.6%; P = .03). State practice environment and participation in practice decision-making were not directly associated with employment and compensation changes.
Policies should facilitate midwifery practice ownership and the expansion and integration of community birth settings for greater perinatal care workforce stability, greater flexibility to respond to disasters, and improved patient access to care and health outcomes.
COVID-19 大流行给助产士劳动力带来了维持高质量护理和患者及围产期护理提供者安全的挑战。本研究分析了不同类型的专业自主性与大流行早期助产士就业和薪酬变化之间的关系。
2020 年秋季向助产实践机构分发了在线调查,比较了 2020 年 2 月和 9 月的助产士就业和薪酬。卡方分析确定了助产士自主性的以下数据之间的关联:州实践环境、助产实践所有权、分娩期实践环境和助产士参与实践决策。
参与者包括来自 727 个实践的助产士领导,代表 50 个州和哥伦比亚特区。77%的实践全职等效(FTE)职位和全职助产士人数保持稳定,83%的兼职工作保持稳定,72%的工资保持稳定。在其余的实践中,更多的实践失去了 FTE 职位、全职职位、兼职职位和工资(分别为 18%、15%、9%和 18%),而获得的职位则更少(分别为 11%、8%、8%和 9%)。9%的实践经历了早期退休和休假,18%的实践失去了福利。然而,助产实践所有权与工资增加(20.3%比 7.1%;P <.001)和福利减少(7.8%比 19.9%;P =.002)以及休假(3.8%比 10.1%;P =.04)显著相关。以社区为基础的实践与 FTE 职位增加(19.0%比 8.8%;P =.005)、兼职职位增加(17.4%比 5.1%;P <.001)和工资增加(19.7%比 7.0%;P <.001)显著相关,以及福利减少(11.5%比 21.1%;P =.02)和提前退休(1.4%比 6.6%;P =.03)减少。州实践环境和参与实践决策与就业和薪酬变化没有直接关系。
政策应促进助产实践所有权的发展,并扩大和整合社区分娩环境,以提高围产期护理人员队伍的稳定性,更灵活地应对灾害,并改善患者获得护理和健康结果的机会。