Suppr超能文献

医院对特定减重手术的偏好差异与减重效果的关系:一项全国性分析。

Hospital Variation in Preference for a Specific Bariatric Procedure and the Association with Weight Loss Performance: a Nationwide Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, NUTRIM School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2022 Nov;32(11):3589-3599. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06212-8. Epub 2022 Sep 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Hospitals performing a certain bariatric procedure in high volumes may have better outcomes. However, they could also have worse outcomes for some patients who are better off receiving another procedure. This study evaluates the effect of hospital preference for a specific type of bariatric procedure on their overall weight loss results.

METHODS

All hospitals performing bariatric surgery were included from the nationwide Dutch Audit for Treatment of Obesity. For each hospital, the expected (E) numbers of sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) were calculated given their patient-mix. These were compared with the observed (O) numbers as the O/E ratio in a funnel plot. The 95% control intervals were used to identify outlier hospitals performing a certain procedure significantly more often than expected given their patient-mix (defined as hospital preference for that procedure). Similarly, funnel plots were created for the outcome of patients achieving ≥ 25% total weight loss (TWL) after 2 years, which was linked to each hospital's preference.

RESULTS

A total of 34,558 patients were included, with 23,154 patients completing a 2-year follow-up, of whom 79.6% achieved ≥ 25%TWL. Nine hospitals had a preference for RYGB (range O/E ratio [1.09-1.53]), with 1 having significantly more patients achieving ≥ 25%TWL (O/E ratio [1.06]). Of 6 hospitals with a preference for SG (range O/E ratio [1.10-2.71]), one hospital had significantly fewer patients achieving ≥ 25%TWL (O/E ratio [0.90]), and from two hospitals with a preference for OAGB (range O/E ratio [4.0-6.0]), one had significantly more patients achieving ≥ 25%TWL (O/E ratio [1.07]). One hospital had no preference for any procedure but did have significantly more patients achieving ≥ 25%TWL (O/E ratio [1.10]).

CONCLUSION

Hospital preference is not consistently associated with better overall weight loss results. This suggests that even though experience with a procedure may be slightly less in hospitals not having a preference, it is still sufficient to achieve similar weight loss outcomes when surgery is provided in centralized high-volume bariatric institutions.

摘要

目的

大量开展某种减重手术的医院可能会取得更好的效果。然而,对于某些患者而言,他们可能从另一种手术中获益更多。本研究评估了医院对特定减重手术类型的偏好对整体减重效果的影响。

方法

纳入了全国性荷兰肥胖治疗审计(NLA)中开展减重手术的所有医院。根据患者构成,为每个医院计算预期(E)的袖状胃切除术(SG)、胃旁路术(RYGB)和单吻合胃旁路术(OAGB)数量。将这些数字与观察到的(O)数量进行比较,绘制漏斗图中的 O/E 比值。使用 95%的控制区间来识别某个特定手术的异常值医院,这些医院的手术数量明显多于根据患者构成计算的预期数量(定义为对该手术的偏好)。同样,也为术后 2 年达到总减重(TWL)≥25%的患者的结果绘制了漏斗图,该结果与每个医院的偏好相关联。

结果

共纳入 34558 例患者,其中 23154 例完成了 2 年随访,其中 79.6%达到了 TWL≥25%。9 家医院对 RYGB 有偏好(O/E 比值范围为 1.09-1.53),其中 1 家医院的患者达到 TWL≥25%的比例显著更高(O/E 比值为 1.06)。6 家对 SG 有偏好的医院中(O/E 比值范围为 1.10-2.71),有 1 家医院的患者达到 TWL≥25%的比例显著更低(O/E 比值为 0.90),而对 OAGB 有偏好的 2 家医院中(O/E 比值范围为 4.0-6.0),有 1 家医院的患者达到 TWL≥25%的比例显著更高(O/E 比值为 1.07)。有 1 家医院对任何手术都没有偏好,但达到 TWL≥25%的患者比例显著更高(O/E 比值为 1.10)。

结论

医院的偏好与整体减重效果并不始终相关。这表明,即使在没有偏好的医院中,手术经验可能稍少,但在集中开展高容量减重手术的机构中,手术仍然可以取得相似的减重效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/395e/9613549/04ba87950d41/11695_2022_6212_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验