Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands; Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, Netherlands; Dutch Obesity Clinic, The Hague, Netherlands.
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021 Jul;17(7):1349-1358. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
Bariatric surgery among patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) can induce complete remission. However, it remains unclear whether sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has better T2D remission within a population-based daily practice.
To compare patients undergoing RYGB and SG on the extent of T2D remission at the 1-year follow-up.
Nationwide, population-based study including all 18 hospitals in the Netherlands providing metabolic and bariatric surgery.
Patients undergoing RYGB and SG between October 2015 and October 2018 with 1 year of complete follow-up data were selected from the mandatory nationwide Dutch Audit for Treatment of Obesity (DATO). The primary outcome is T2D remission within 1 year. Secondary outcomes include ≥20% total weight loss (TWL), obesity-related co-morbidity reduction, and postoperative complications with a Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥III within 30 days. We compared T2D remission between RYGB and SG groups using propensity score matching to adjust for confounding by indication.
A total of 5015 patients were identified from the DATO, and 4132 (82.4%) had completed a 1-year follow-up visit. There were 3350 (66.8%) patients with a valid T2D status who were included in the analysis (RYGB = 2623; SG = 727). RYGB patients had a lower body mass index than SG patients, but were more often female, with higher gastroesophageal reflux disease and dyslipidemia rates. After adjusting for these confounders, RYGB patients had increased odds of achieving T2D remission (odds ratio [OR], 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-2.1; P < .01). Groups were balanced after matching 695 patients in each group. After matching, RYGB patients still had better odds of T2D remission (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.27-2.88; P < .01). Also, significantly more RYGB patients had ≥20%TWL (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.96-3.75; P < .01) and RYGB patients had higher dyslipidemia remission rates (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.39-2.76; P < .01). There were no significant differences in CD ≥III complications.
Using population-based data from the Netherlands, this study shows that RYGB leads to better T2D remission rates at the 1-year follow-up and better metabolic outcomes for patients with obesity and T2D undergoing bariatric surgery in daily practice.
肥胖症和 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者的减重手术可诱导完全缓解。然而,在基于人群的日常实践中,胃旁路术(RYGB)或袖状胃切除术(SG)在 T2D 缓解方面哪种效果更好,目前仍不清楚。
比较 RYGB 和 SG 在 1 年随访时 T2D 缓解程度。
包括荷兰全国 18 家提供代谢和减重手术的医院在内的全国性、基于人群的研究。
从强制性的荷兰减重治疗审计(DATO)中选择 2015 年 10 月至 2018 年 10 月期间接受 RYGB 和 SG 治疗且随访时间完整达 1 年的患者。主要结局是 1 年内 T2D 缓解情况。次要结局包括≥20%的总体体重减轻(TWL)、肥胖相关合并症减少和术后 30 天内出现 Clavien-Dindo(CD)分级≥III 级的并发症。我们通过倾向评分匹配来比较 RYGB 和 SG 组之间的 T2D 缓解情况,以调整指示性偏倚。
从 DATO 中确定了 5015 名患者,其中 4132 名(82.4%)完成了 1 年随访。在可获得有效 T2D 状态的 3350 名(66.8%)患者中,有 3350 名(66.8%)被纳入分析(RYGB=2623 例;SG=727 例)。RYGB 患者的体重指数低于 SG 患者,但女性更多,胃食管反流病和血脂异常的发生率更高。在调整这些混杂因素后,RYGB 患者 T2D 缓解的几率更高(比值比[OR],1.54;95%置信区间[CI],1.14-2.1;P<.01)。在每组匹配 695 例患者后,两组之间达到平衡。匹配后,RYGB 患者 T2D 缓解的几率仍然更高(OR,1.91;95%CI,1.27-2.88;P<.01)。此外,RYGB 患者的 TWL≥20%的比例显著更高(OR,2.71;95%CI,1.96-3.75;P<.01),RYGB 患者的血脂异常缓解率更高(OR,1.96;95%CI,1.39-2.76;P<.01)。两组的 CD≥III 级并发症无显著差异。
使用来自荷兰的基于人群的数据,本研究表明,在肥胖症和 T2D 患者接受减重手术的日常实践中,RYGB 在 1 年随访时可导致更高的 T2D 缓解率和更好的代谢结果。