• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本超高龄老人身体机能参考值:SONIC 研究。

Physical performance reference values for Japanese oldest old: a SONIC study.

机构信息

Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.

Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2022 Sep 13;22(1):748. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03299-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-022-03299-7
PMID:36100911
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9470232/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The oldest old, defined as those aged 90 or over, is now the fastest-growing population sector. This study aimed to determine reference values for several physical performance measures (PPMs) among 90-year-olds using internationally standardized measurements and to clarify the characteristics of these indices by comparing their results for 90-year-olds with those for older people 70 and 80.

METHODS

We used the Septuagenarians, Octogenarians, and Nonagenarians Investigation with Centenarians (SONIC) study data from 2010 to 2018. The study subjects were 70, 80, and 90-year-olds in the target area eligible to participate in the venue. Excluding those certified for long-term care, the final number of eligible persons is 70s cohort 1000 (2010), 80s cohort 973 (2011), and 90s cohort 690. 90s cohort only consisted of three survey waves: 2012, 2015, and 2018. We used hand grip strength and score on the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) for our physical performance measurements. In addition, we statistically analyzed sex and age differences.

RESULT

The simple mean ± standard deviation (SD) for the 90-year-old respondents were in men, 24.1 ± 5.4 kg in hand grip strength, 0.80 ± 0.22 m/s in usual gait speed, 17.2 ± 6.73 s in 5times chair stand, 5.89 ± 4.42 s in tandem balance, and 8.3 ± 2.2 in SPPB respectively and in women, 14.4 ± 4.0 kg in hand grip strength, 0.72 ± 0.20 m/s in usual gait speed, 17.8 ± 7.89 s in 5times chair stand, 4.72 ± 4.35 s in tandem balance, and 7.5 ± 2.4 in SPPB, respectively. For all PPMs, the age 90 cohort was statistically significantly different from the age 70 and 80 cohorts (all trends P <  0.001). Hand grip strength decreased with a similar gradient with age cohort increase of 10 years for both sexes. In contrast, SPPB lower limb score showed a larger drop between the age 80 and 90 cohorts than between the age 70 and 80 cohorts. We also constructed sex-specific appraisal standards according to quintiles.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study yielded inclusive sex-specific reference values and appraisal standards for major physical performance measures not certified as requiring long-term care, community-dwelling, oldest old Japanese. The characteristics of age-related decline in physical performance differed between the upper and lower extremity assessments.

摘要

背景

90 岁及以上的老年人是目前增长最快的人口群体,被定义为最年长的老年人。本研究旨在使用国际标准化的测量方法确定 90 岁老年人的多项身体表现测量(PPM)的参考值,并通过比较 90 岁老年人与 70 岁和 80 岁老年人的结果来阐明这些指标的特征。

方法

我们使用了 2010 年至 2018 年的“七十、八十和九十岁老年人与百岁老人研究(SONIC)”的数据。研究对象是目标地区符合参加场地条件的 70、80 和 90 岁老年人。不包括经认证需要长期护理的老年人,符合条件的 70 岁队列人数为 1000 人(2010 年),80 岁队列为 973 人(2011 年),90 岁队列为 690 人。90 岁队列仅包括三个调查波:2012 年、2015 年和 2018 年。我们使用握力和简短体能表现电池(SPPB)评分作为我们的身体表现测量。此外,我们还进行了统计学分析,以比较性别和年龄差异。

结果

90 岁男性受访者的简单平均值±标准差(SD)分别为握力 24.1±5.4kg,常规步速 0.80±0.22m/s,5 次椅子站立 17.2±6.73s,平衡式站立 5.89±4.42s,SPPB 为 8.3±2.2。女性受访者的相应数据分别为握力 14.4±4.0kg,常规步速 0.72±0.20m/s,5 次椅子站立 17.8±7.89s,平衡式站立 4.72±4.35s,SPPB 为 7.5±2.4。对于所有 PPM,90 岁年龄组与 70 岁和 80 岁年龄组在统计学上有显著差异(所有趋势 P<0.001)。两性的握力都随着年龄组增加 10 岁而以相似的梯度下降。相比之下,SPPB 下肢评分在 80 岁和 90 岁年龄组之间的下降幅度大于 70 岁和 80 岁年龄组之间的下降幅度。我们还根据五分位数为每个性别构建了专门的评估标准。

结论

本研究为不需要长期护理、居住在社区的日本最年长老年人的主要身体表现测量提供了包括性别特异性的参考值和评估标准。上下肢评估中,身体表现随年龄下降的特征不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/703e/9472342/9fcb4e2df37a/12877_2022_3299_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/703e/9472342/9fcb4e2df37a/12877_2022_3299_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/703e/9472342/9fcb4e2df37a/12877_2022_3299_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Physical performance reference values for Japanese oldest old: a SONIC study.日本超高龄老人身体机能参考值:SONIC 研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Sep 13;22(1):748. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03299-7.
2
Reference values and age and sex differences in physical performance measures for community-dwelling older Japanese: a pooled analysis of six cohort studies.日本社区居住老年人身体机能指标的参考值及年龄和性别差异:六项队列研究的汇总分析
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 12;9(6):e99487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099487. eCollection 2014.
3
Norwegian reference values for the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB): the Tromsø Study.挪威短体适能测试电池(SPPB)参考值:特罗姆瑟研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Aug 8;19(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1234-8.
4
SPPB reference values and performance in assessing sarcopenia in community-dwelling Singaporeans - Yishun study.握力、步速和身体活动能力简表(SPPB)参考值及其在评估新加坡义顺社区居民肌肉减少症中的表现——义顺研究
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Mar 30;21(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02147-4.
5
Trunk fat mass correlates with balance and physical performance in a community-dwelling elderly population: Results from the Korean Frailty and aging cohort study.躯干脂肪量与社区居住老年人群的平衡能力和身体机能相关:韩国衰弱与老龄化队列研究结果
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(9):e19245. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019245.
6
Physical functioning associated with life-space mobility in later life among men and women.中老年男性和女性的身体功能与生活空间移动性相关。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 26;22(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03065-9.
7
Usefulness of the serum creatinine/cystatin C ratio as a blood biomarker for sarcopenia components among age groups in community-dwelling older people: The SONIC study.血清肌酐/胱抑素 C 比值作为社区居住老年人年龄组中肌少症成分的血液生物标志物的有用性:SONIC 研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2024 Jun;24(6):529-536. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14876. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
8
Associations between novel jump test measures, grip strength, and physical performance: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study.新型跳跃测试指标与握力和身体表现的相关性:男性骨质疏松性骨折研究(MrOS)。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Apr;32(4):587-595. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01421-1. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
9
Applications of physical performance measures to routine diabetes care for frailty prevention concept: fundamental data with grip strength, gait speed, timed chair stand speed, standing balance, and knee extension strength.应用身体机能指标进行衰弱预防概念的常规糖尿病护理:握力、步速、定时椅立速度、站立平衡和膝关节伸展力量的基本数据。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Sep;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001562.
10
Effects of multimorbidity and polypharmacy on physical function in community-dwelling older adults: A 3-year prospective cohort study from the SONIC.多病症和多种药物治疗对社区居住的老年人体能的影响:来自 SONIC 的一项为期 3 年的前瞻性队列研究。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2024 Nov;126:105521. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2024.105521. Epub 2024 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Polydoctoring and health outcomes among the very old population with multimorbidity: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.患有多种疾病的高龄人群中的多医生诊疗情况与健康结局:日本的一项回顾性队列研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 1;15(1):32046. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-18178-5.
2
Multidimensional insights about healthy aging from the cohort study for community-dwelling older adults: The SONIC study.针对社区居住老年人的队列研究对健康衰老的多维度见解:SONIC研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2025 Mar;25(3):346-355. doi: 10.1111/ggi.70003. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
3
Correlation between Power Elbow Flexion and Physical Performance Test: A Potential Predictor for Assessing Physical Performance in Older Adults.

本文引用的文献

1
Short Physical Performance Battery as a Measure of Physical Performance and Mortality Predictor in Older Adults: A Comprehensive Literature Review.简短体能表现电池作为老年人体能表现和死亡率预测指标的综合文献回顾。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 10;18(20):10612. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010612.
2
Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment.亚洲肌少症工作组:2019年肌少症诊断与治疗共识更新
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Mar;21(3):300-307.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
3
Lifestyle-related signs of locomotive syndrome in the general Japanese population: A cross-sectional study.
动力性肘关节屈曲与身体机能测试之间的相关性:评估老年人身体机能的一个潜在预测指标。
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 26;12(17):5560. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175560.
4
Functional Capacity of Noninstitutionalized Older Adults from Northwest Mexico: Reference Values.墨西哥西北部非机构养老老年人的功能能力:参考值
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 13;11(12):1733. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121733.
日本普通人群中与生活方式相关的运动机能不全综合征体征:一项横断面研究。
J Orthop Sci. 2019 Nov;24(6):1105-1109. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
4
Cohort Profile: The Danish Longitudinal Study of Ageing (DLSA).队列简介:丹麦老龄化纵向研究(DLSA)。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Aug 1;48(4):1050-1050g. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz026.
5
Frailty and Cognitive Impairment in Predicting Mortality Among Oldest-Old People.衰弱和认知障碍对高龄老人死亡率的预测作用
Front Aging Neurosci. 2018 Oct 18;10:295. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00295. eCollection 2018.
6
Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis.肌少症:定义和诊断的欧洲共识修订版。
Age Ageing. 2019 Jan 1;48(1):16-31. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy169.
7
Physical, sensory, and cognitive functioning among centenarians: a comparison between the Tokyo and Georgia centenarian studies.百岁老人的身体、感官和认知功能:东京和佐治亚州百岁老人研究的比较。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Nov;27(11):3037-3046. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1943-z. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
8
Low protein intake, muscle strength and physical performance in the very old: The Newcastle 85+ Study.低蛋白摄入、肌肉力量与高龄老年人的身体机能:纽卡斯尔 85+ 研究。
Clin Nutr. 2018 Dec;37(6 Pt A):2260-2270. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
9
Redefining the elderly as aged 75 years and older: Proposal from the Joint Committee of Japan Gerontological Society and the Japan Geriatrics Society.将老年人重新定义为75岁及以上:日本老年学会和日本老年医学学会联合委员会的提议。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Jul;17(7):1045-1047. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13118. Epub 2017 Jul 2.
10
Association of Grip Strength With Risk of All-Cause Mortality, Cardiovascular Diseases, and Cancer in Community-Dwelling Populations: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.握力与社区居民全因死亡率、心血管疾病和癌症风险的关系:一项前瞻性队列研究的荟萃分析。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jun 1;18(6):551.e17-551.e35. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.03.011.