• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于计算语言学的自动健康素养测量方法在不同种族/民族间的有效性:来自 ECLIPPSE 项目的研究结果。

Validity of a Computational Linguistics-Derived Automated Health Literacy Measure Across Race/Ethnicity: Findings from The ECLIPPSE Project.

机构信息

University of California San Francisco and the Division of Research, Northern California Kaiser Permanente.

State University of New York Old Westbury and Arizona State University.

出版信息

J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2021 May;32(2 Suppl):347-365. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2021.0067.

DOI:10.1353/hpu.2021.0067
PMID:36101652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9467454/
Abstract

Limited health literacy (HL) partially mediates health disparities. Measurement constraints, including lack of validity assessment across racial/ethnic groups and administration challenges, have undermined the field and impeded scaling of HL interventions. We employed computational linguistics to develop an automated and novel HL measure, analyzing >300,000 messages sent by >9,000 diabetes patients via a patient portal to create a Literacy Profiles. We carried out stratified analyses among White/non-Hispanics, Black/non-Hispanics, Hispanics, and Asian/Pacific Islanders to determine if the Literacy Profile has comparable criterion and predictive validities. We discovered that criterion validity was consistently high across all groups (c-statistics 0.82-0.89). We observed consistent relationships across racial/ethnic groups between HL and outcomes, including communication, adherence, hypoglycemia, diabetes control, and ED utilization. While concerns have arisen regarding bias in AI, the automated Literacy Profile appears sufficiently valid across race/ethnicity, enabling HL measurement at a scale that could improve clinical care and population health among diverse populations.

摘要

健康素养(HL)有限部分导致了健康差距。测量限制,包括缺乏跨种族/民族群体的有效性评估以及管理挑战,已经削弱了该领域,并阻碍了 HL 干预措施的扩展。我们运用计算语言学开发了一种自动化的新型 HL 衡量标准,通过分析 9000 多名糖尿病患者通过患者门户发送的超过 300,000 条消息,创建了一个 Literacy Profiles。我们在白人和非西班牙裔、黑人和非西班牙裔、西班牙裔以及亚裔/太平洋岛民中进行了分层分析,以确定 Literacy Profile 是否具有可比的标准和预测有效性。我们发现,所有组的标准有效性都非常高(c 统计量为 0.82-0.89)。我们观察到 HL 与包括沟通、依从性、低血糖、糖尿病控制和 ED 使用在内的结果之间存在一致的关系,跨越了种族/民族群体。虽然人们对人工智能中的偏见提出了担忧,但自动化的 Literacy Profile 在跨种族/民族方面似乎具有足够的有效性,使 HL 测量能够达到改善不同人群临床护理和人口健康的规模。

相似文献

1
Validity of a Computational Linguistics-Derived Automated Health Literacy Measure Across Race/Ethnicity: Findings from The ECLIPPSE Project.基于计算语言学的自动健康素养测量方法在不同种族/民族间的有效性:来自 ECLIPPSE 项目的研究结果。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2021 May;32(2 Suppl):347-365. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2021.0067.
2
Employing computational linguistics techniques to identify limited patient health literacy: Findings from the ECLIPPSE study.运用计算语言学技术识别有限的患者健康素养:来自 ECLIPPSE 研究的发现。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb;56(1):132-144. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13560. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
3
Challenges and solutions to employing natural language processing and machine learning to measure patients' health literacy and physician writing complexity: The ECLIPPSE study.运用自然语言处理和机器学习来衡量患者健康素养及医生书写复杂度所面临的挑战与解决方案:ECLIPPSE研究
J Biomed Inform. 2021 Jan;113:103658. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103658. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
4
Using natural language processing and machine learning to classify health literacy from secure messages: The ECLIPPSE study.利用自然语言处理和机器学习从安全消息中分类健康素养:ECLIPPSE 研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 22;14(2):e0212488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212488. eCollection 2019.
5
The Next Frontier in Communication and the ECLIPPSE Study: Bridging the Linguistic Divide in Secure Messaging.通信的下一个前沿领域与ECLIPPSE研究:弥合安全消息传递中的语言鸿沟。
J Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:1348242. doi: 10.1155/2017/1348242. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
6
Developing and Testing Automatic Models of Patient Communicative Health Literacy Using Linguistic Features: Findings from the ECLIPPSE study.利用语言特征开发和测试患者沟通健康素养的自动模型:来自 ECLIPPSE 研究的发现。
Health Commun. 2021 Jul;36(8):1018-1028. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1731781. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
7
Validation of self-reported health literacy questions among diverse English and Spanish-speaking populations.不同英语和西班牙语人群中自我报告健康素养问题的验证。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Mar;26(3):265-71. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1552-1. Epub 2010 Nov 6.
8
The Intersections Between Social Determinants of Health, Health Literacy, and Health Disparities.健康的社会决定因素、健康素养与健康差距之间的交叉点
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 25;269:22-41. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200020.
9
Health literacy and quality of physician-trauma patient communication: Opportunity for improvement.健康素养与医患沟通质量:改进的机会。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jul;85(1):193-197. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001934.
10
The literacy divide: health literacy and the use of an internet-based patient portal in an integrated health system-results from the diabetes study of northern California (DISTANCE).读写能力差距:在综合卫生系统中,健康素养和互联网患者门户的使用——来自加利福尼亚北部的糖尿病研究(DISTANCE)的结果。
J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):183-96. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.499988.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining inclusivity: the use of AI and diverse populations in health and social care: a systematic review.审视包容性:人工智能在健康与社会护理中的应用及不同人群:一项系统综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 5;25(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02884-1.
2
Precision communication: Physicians' linguistic adaptation to patients' health literacy.精准沟通:医生对患者健康素养的语言调适
Sci Adv. 2021 Dec 17;7(51):eabj2836. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abj2836.

本文引用的文献

1
Descriptive examination of secure messaging in a longitudinal cohort of diabetes patients in the ECLIPPSE study.描述性分析 ECLIPPSE 研究中纵向队列糖尿病患者的安全信息传递。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jun 12;28(6):1252-1258. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa281.
2
Employing computational linguistics techniques to identify limited patient health literacy: Findings from the ECLIPPSE study.运用计算语言学技术识别有限的患者健康素养:来自 ECLIPPSE 研究的发现。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb;56(1):132-144. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13560. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
3
The Intersections Between Social Determinants of Health, Health Literacy, and Health Disparities.健康的社会决定因素、健康素养与健康差距之间的交叉点
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 25;269:22-41. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200020.
4
Developing and Testing Automatic Models of Patient Communicative Health Literacy Using Linguistic Features: Findings from the ECLIPPSE study.利用语言特征开发和测试患者沟通健康素养的自动模型:来自 ECLIPPSE 研究的发现。
Health Commun. 2021 Jul;36(8):1018-1028. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1731781. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
5
Addressing Bias in Artificial Intelligence in Health Care.应对医疗保健领域人工智能中的偏见问题。
JAMA. 2019 Dec 24;322(24):2377-2378. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.18058.
6
How to Read Articles That Use Machine Learning: Users' Guides to the Medical Literature.如何阅读使用机器学习的文章:医学文献的用户指南。
JAMA. 2019 Nov 12;322(18):1806-1816. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.16489.
7
Secure Messaging with Physicians by Proxies for Patients with Diabetes: Findings from the ECLIPPSE Study.糖尿病患者代理与医生的安全信息传递:来自 ECLIPPSE 研究的结果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov;34(11):2490-2496. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05259-1. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
8
Using natural language processing and machine learning to classify health literacy from secure messages: The ECLIPPSE study.利用自然语言处理和机器学习从安全消息中分类健康素养:ECLIPPSE 研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 22;14(2):e0212488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212488. eCollection 2019.
9
Engaging Diverse English- and Spanish-Speaking Older Adults in Advance Care Planning: The PREPARE Randomized Clinical Trial.参与式准备计划研究:一项针对不同英语和西班牙语老年人群体的随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1616-1625. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4657.
10
The Tool for the Automatic Analysis of Cohesion 2.0: Integrating semantic similarity and text overlap.自动分析粘着度工具 2.0:整合语义相似度和文本重叠。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):14-27. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1142-4.