Digestive Endoscopy Center, Beijing Jingmei Group General Hospital, Mentougou, Beijing 102399, China.
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Aug 26;2022:8603625. doi: 10.1155/2022/8603625. eCollection 2022.
This study aimed to investigate the safety, tolerance, and comfort of the subjects in gastroscopy by observing and comparing the effect of gastroscopy under two different breathing modes: nasal breathing and nasal inspiration and oral expiration. A total of 60 subjects who underwent routine gastroscopy in the hospital from January 2021 to June 2021 were selected as the research subjects. According to the willingness of the subjects, they were divided into a nasal breathing group and a nasal inspiration and oral expiration group. The differences in vital signs, adverse reactions, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were compared between the two groups. There were no significant differences in mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and blood oxygen saturation between the two groups before, during, and after the examination ( > 0.05). The nasal breathing group had fewer adverse reactions such as nausea, cough, belching, and restlessness than the nasal inspiration and oral expiration group, and the difference was statistically significant ( < 0.01). VAS score of the nasal breathing group was lower than that of the nasal inspiration and oral expiration group, and the difference was statistically significant ( < 0.01). Subjects are more tolerant to nasal breathing mode, which causes fewer adverse reactions, less pain, and more comfort and is more worthy to be popularized in primary hospitals.
本研究旨在通过观察和比较两种不同呼吸模式（鼻呼吸和鼻吸气口呼气）下胃镜检查的受试者安全性、耐受性和舒适度，来探讨胃镜检查中两种不同呼吸模式的效果。选取 2021 年 1 月至 6 月在我院行常规胃镜检查的 60 例受试者作为研究对象，根据受试者的意愿将其分为鼻呼吸组和鼻吸气口呼气组，比较两组患者的生命体征、不良反应及视觉模拟评分（VAS）。两组患者检查前、检查中、检查后平均动脉压、心率、血氧饱和度比较差异均无统计学意义（ > 0.05）。鼻呼吸组恶心、咳嗽、呃逆、躁动等不良反应少于鼻吸气口呼气组，差异有统计学意义（ < 0.01）。鼻呼吸组 VAS 评分低于鼻吸气口呼气组，差异有统计学意义（ < 0.01）。受试者对鼻呼吸模式的耐受性更好，不良反应更少，疼痛更少，舒适度更高，更值得在基层医院推广。
