Winter Meredith C, Ledbetter David R
Department of Anesthesiology Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Sep 8;4(9):e0764. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000764. eCollection 2022 Sep.
Accurately predicting time to death after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment is valuable for family counseling and for identifying candidates for organ donation after cardiac death. This topic has been well studied in adults, but literature is scant in pediatrics. The purpose of this report is to assess the performance and clinical utility of the available tools for predicting time to death after treatment withdrawal in children.
Terms related to predicting time to death after treatment withdrawal were searched in PubMed and Embase from 1993 to November 2021.
Studies endeavoring to predict time to death or describe factors related to time to death were included. Articles focusing on perceptions or practices of treatment withdrawal were excluded.
Titles, abstracts, and full text of articles were screened to determine eligibility. Data extraction was performed manually. Two-by-two tables were reconstructed with available data from each article to compare performance metrics head to head.
Three hundred eighteen citations were identified from the initial search, resulting in 22 studies that were retained for full-text review. Among the pediatric studies, predictive models were developed using multiple logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards, and an advanced machine learning algorithm. In each of the original model derivation studies, the models demonstrated a classification accuracy ranging from 75% to 91% and positive predictive value ranging from 0.76 to 0.93.
There are few tools to predict time to death after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in children. They are limited by small numbers and incomplete validation. Future work includes utilization of advanced machine learning models.
准确预测撤除生命维持治疗后的死亡时间,对于家庭咨询以及确定心脏死亡后器官捐献的候选者具有重要价值。该主题在成人中已有充分研究,但儿科方面的文献却很少。本报告的目的是评估现有工具在预测儿童撤除治疗后的死亡时间方面的性能和临床实用性。
在1993年至2021年11月期间,在PubMed和Embase中搜索了与预测撤除治疗后的死亡时间相关的术语。
纳入了旨在预测死亡时间或描述与死亡时间相关因素的研究。排除了关注撤除治疗的认知或实践的文章。
对文章的标题、摘要和全文进行筛选以确定是否符合条件。数据提取采用手动方式。利用每篇文章中的可用数据重建二乘二表,以直接比较性能指标。
通过初步搜索确定了318篇引文,最终保留22篇研究进行全文审查。在儿科研究中,使用多元逻辑回归、Cox比例风险模型和先进的机器学习算法开发了预测模型。在每项原始模型推导研究中,模型的分类准确率在75%至91%之间,阳性预测值在0.76至0.93之间。
预测儿童撤除生命维持治疗后的死亡时间的工具很少。它们受到样本量小和验证不完整的限制。未来的工作包括利用先进的机器学习模型。