• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PMID:36103589
Abstract

Based on CADTH’s reanalysis, tildrakizumab is not cost-effective at a WTP threshold of $50,000 per QALY; CADTH’s findings on the cost-effectiveness of tildrakizumab are aligned with the sponsor’s results. Some biologic drugs provide better efficacy in terms of response at a lower total cost (e.g., adalimumab, brodalumab, and infliximab have better efficacy than tildrakizumab at a lower total cost). At least a 20% reduction in the submitted price would be required for tildrakizumab to be cost-effective at a WTP threshold of $50,000 per QALY. It should be noted there is significant uncertainty around the clinical effectiveness of tildrakizumab; additionally, the economic model did not allow CADTH to assess the impact of assumptions relating to the waning of treatment effect and the use of alternative treatment sequences in clinical practice. This adds to the uncertainty of the cost-effectiveness of tildrakizumab.

摘要

相似文献

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults and an economic evaluation of their cost-effectiveness.阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗治疗成人类风湿关节炎有效性的系统评价及其成本效益的经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(42):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-229. doi: 10.3310/hta10420.
8
Health Technology Assessment Reports for Non-Oncology Medications in Canada from 2018 to 2022: Methodological Critiques on Manufacturers' Submissions and a Comparison between Manufacturer and Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) Analyses.2018年至2022年加拿大非肿瘤药物的卫生技术评估报告:对制造商提交材料的方法学批判以及制造商与加拿大卫生药物和技术局(CADTH)分析之间的比较。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Nov;8(6):823-836. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00511-9. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
9
Cost-effectiveness of tildrakizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the United States.特诺雅治疗中重度银屑病的成本效益:来自美国的研究
J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 Mar;33(2):740-748. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1773382. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
10
Etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.依那西普、英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗治疗银屑病关节炎:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Feb;15(10):i-xxi, 1-329. doi: 10.3310/hta15100.