Suppr超能文献

时机很重要:癫痫持续状态两个时间点之间的短期结局存在显著差异。

Timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.

CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Shanghai, 200032, China.

出版信息

BMC Neurol. 2022 Sep 14;22(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02868-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2015, the International League Against Epilepsy proposed a new conceptual definition of status epilepticus (SE) with two operational dimensions (t1 and t2) to guide emergency treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical characteristics and prognoses of patients at these two different time points.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of consecutive adults diagnosed with SE. In case of convulsive SE, t1 is 5 min and t2 is 30 min, whereas in case of focal SE with impaired consciousness, t1 is 10 min, t2 is 60 min. Data on clinical characteristics, including age, gender, history of prior seizures, neuroimaging, semiology, duration, and etiology of SE, were collected. The primary outcome was mortality, with seizure recurrence as a secondary measure, and functional status as tertiary outcome of enrolled patients at 3 months after SE onset.

RESULTS

We screened one hundred patients with SE, with a median age of 66 years and 61% were male. Fifty-six (56.0%) patients reached t1 of SE, while 44 (44.0%) reached t2 of SE. Convulsive SE (52.0%, n = 52) was more common than focal SE with impaired consciousness (48.0%, n = 48). Status epilepticus secondary to an acute symptomatic process was the most common (50%, n = 50). Patients meeting t2 of SE demonstrated a remarkably increased risk of mortality (unadjusted analysis-RR 3.606, 95%CI 1.552-8.376, p = 0.003; adjusted analysis-RR 2.924, 95%CI 1.221-7.003, p = 0.016) and unfavorable functional status (unadjusted analysis-RR 1.803, 95%CI 1.280-2.539, p = 0.001; adjusted analysis-RR 1.664, 95%CI 1.184-2.340, p = 0.003) at 3 months compared to those who only reached t1 of SE. Patients reaching t2 of SE were more likely to experience seizure recurrence, however, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides strong support for the new definition of SE. Patients meeting t2 of SE tend to have a remarkably increased risk of mortality and unfavorable functional outcomes compared to those who only reached t1 of SE. Furthermore, patients were likely to experience seizure recurrence after undergoing an episode of SE. Physicians must be educated about prompt recognition and appropriate management of SE.

摘要

背景

2015 年,国际抗癫痫联盟提出了新的癫痫持续状态(SE)概念定义,包含两个操作维度(t1 和 t2),以指导紧急治疗。本研究旨在比较处于这两个不同时间点的患者的临床特征和预后。

方法

我们对连续诊断为 SE 的成年患者进行了前瞻性观察队列研究。在惊厥性 SE 中,t1 为 5 分钟,t2 为 30 分钟,而在意识障碍的局灶性 SE 中,t1 为 10 分钟,t2 为 60 分钟。收集了包括年龄、性别、既往发作史、神经影像学、症状学、SE 持续时间和病因在内的临床特征数据。主要结局是死亡率,以癫痫复发为次要指标,以发病 3 个月后的功能状态为三级结局。

结果

我们筛选了 100 例 SE 患者,中位年龄为 66 岁,61%为男性。56(56.0%)例患者达到 SE 的 t1,44(44.0%)例患者达到 SE 的 t2。惊厥性 SE(52.0%,n=52)比意识障碍的局灶性 SE(48.0%,n=48)更为常见。急性症状性疾病继发的 SE 是最常见的(50%,n=50)。达到 SE 的 t2 的患者的死亡率风险显著增加(未调整分析 RR 3.606,95%CI 1.552-8.376,p=0.003;调整分析 RR 2.924,95%CI 1.221-7.003,p=0.016)和功能状态不良(未调整分析 RR 1.803,95%CI 1.280-2.539,p=0.001;调整分析 RR 1.664,95%CI 1.184-2.340,p=0.003),与仅达到 SE 的 t1 的患者相比。达到 SE 的 t2 的患者更有可能经历癫痫复发,但两组之间没有显著差异。

结论

我们的研究为 SE 的新定义提供了有力支持。与仅达到 SE 的 t1 的患者相比,达到 SE 的 t2 的患者的死亡率和不良功能结局风险显著增加。此外,患者在经历 SE 发作后可能会发生癫痫复发。必须对医生进行关于 SE 的快速识别和适当治疗的教育。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e44/9472412/a081b1f8f685/12883_2022_2868_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验