• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊室和医生对癫痫持续状态管理的准备情况:来自加沙地带的多机构调查。

ER and doctors' preparedness to manage status epilepticus: a multi-institutional survey from the Gaza Strip.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Islamic University of Gaza, P.O. Box 108, Gaza, State of Palestine.

Health Services, United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), Gaza, State of Palestine.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 23;24(1):1274. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11792-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11792-5
PMID:39444030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11515649/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Status epilepticus (SE) is a top neurological and medical emergency. Adequate staff knowledge and sufficient hospital resources are mandatory for timely management and better outcomes. This study aims to evaluate Palestinian ER doctors' knowledge and beliefs towards SE and assess the state and availability of hospital resources needed to manage SE appropriately.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study surveyed all ER doctors working in the six governmental hospitals in the Gaza Strip during June 2022. A questionnaire assessed the knowledge and beliefs toward SE and the practice of SE knowledge acquisition. Simultaneous field surveys determined the availability of essential medications and resources at each hospital and doctors' actual awareness about the status of these resources. Linear regression determined predictors of higher knowledge scores.

RESULTS

137 doctors participated (response rate 81%). Most were males, had graduated within six years of data collection, and 45.3% worked at Shifa Medical Complex. 63.5% of participants recognized the correct operational definition of status epilepticus. 85.4 and 83.9% recognized that it might cause permanent brain damage or death, respectively. Only 10.9% recognized the average mortality rate of a single convulsive SE episode. 44.5% believed that awaiting spontaneous SE resolution is a valid approach to management. Significant defects were noted in the awareness of subclinical SE, including its recognition and prevalence in ciritcally ill patients. Having a higher qualification and graduating from local medical schools predicted higher scores. In field surveys, EEG was unavailable at all hospitals, while CT scans and a neurologist physician were unavailable at two hospitals. IV phenytoin was the only second-line treatment available at all hospitals. IV valproate and levetiracetam were universally unavailable.

CONCLUSIONS

The survey revealed significant defects in Palestinian ER doctors' knowledge and beliefs towards SE. Several hospitals also demonstrated a critical lack of resources to manage this condition appropriately. This should be addressed by the local health authorities to avoid potentially preventable SE-related mortality and morbidity.

摘要

背景

癫痫持续状态(SE)是一种顶级的神经和医学急症。及时管理和更好的结果需要医生具备充足的专业知识和足够的医院资源。本研究旨在评估巴勒斯坦急诊医生对 SE 的认识和信念,并评估适当管理 SE 所需的医院资源的状态和可用性。

方法

这是一项 2022 年 6 月在加沙地带六家政府医院工作的所有急诊医生参与的横断面研究。问卷调查评估了医生对 SE 的知识和信念,以及获取 SE 知识的实践情况。同时进行实地调查,以确定每家医院基本药物和资源的可用性,以及医生对这些资源状况的实际了解程度。线性回归确定了更高知识得分的预测因素。

结果

共有 137 名医生参与(应答率为 81%)。大多数是男性,毕业于数据收集后六年内,45.3%在 Shifa 医疗中心工作。63.5%的参与者正确识别了癫痫持续状态的操作定义。85.4%和 83.9%的人分别认识到它可能导致永久性脑损伤或死亡。只有 10.9%的人认识到单次惊厥性 SE 发作的平均死亡率。44.5%的人认为等待自发 SE 缓解是一种有效的管理方法。在对亚临床 SE 的认识方面,包括对其在危重病患者中的识别和流行程度的认识方面,存在显著缺陷。更高的资质和毕业于当地医学院校预测得分更高。在实地调查中,所有医院都没有脑电图,两家医院没有 CT 扫描和神经科医生。所有医院都只有静脉注射苯妥英钠作为二线治疗。所有医院都普遍没有静脉注射丙戊酸钠和左乙拉西坦。

结论

调查显示,巴勒斯坦急诊医生对 SE 的认识和信念存在重大缺陷。几家医院也明显缺乏适当管理这种疾病的资源。这应由地方卫生当局解决,以避免潜在的可预防的 SE 相关死亡率和发病率。

相似文献

1
ER and doctors' preparedness to manage status epilepticus: a multi-institutional survey from the Gaza Strip.急诊室和医生对癫痫持续状态管理的准备情况:来自加沙地带的多机构调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 23;24(1):1274. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11792-5.
2
Levetiracetam as an alternative to phenytoin for second-line emergency treatment of children with convulsive status epilepticus: the EcLiPSE RCT.左乙拉西坦作为苯妥英钠的替代药物,用于惊厥性癫痫持续状态儿童的二线急救治疗:EcLiPSE RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(58):1-96. doi: 10.3310/hta24580.
3
Predictors of outcomes and refractoriness in status epilepticus: A prospective study.癫痫持续状态的预后及难治性预测因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Oct;75:158-164. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.07.046. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
4
Pre-hospital and emergency department treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in adults: an evidence synthesis.成人惊厥性癫痫持续状态的院前和急诊处理:证据综合。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Mar;26(20):1-76. doi: 10.3310/RSVK2062.
5
Awareness, attitudes and knowledge about evidencebased medicine among doctors in Gaza: a crosssectional survey.加沙医生对循证医学的认知、态度和知识:一项横断面调查。
East Mediterr Health J. 2017 Nov 19;23(9):626-631.
6
Treating patients in a safe environment: a cross-sectional study of patient safety attitudes among doctors in the Gaza Strip, Palestine.在安全环境中治疗患者:巴勒斯坦加沙地带医生对患者安全态度的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 7;20(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05230-5.
7
A multicentre randomised controlled trial of levetiracetam versus phenytoin for convulsive status epilepticus in children (protocol): Convulsive Status Epilepticus Paediatric Trial (ConSEPT) - a PREDICT study.左乙拉西坦与苯妥英钠治疗儿童惊厥性癫痫持续状态的多中心随机对照试验(方案):惊厥性癫痫持续状态儿科试验(ConSEPT)——一项预测性研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Jun 22;17(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0887-8.
8
The condition of health services in the Gaza Strip.加沙地带的卫生服务状况。
Med War. 1990 Apr-Jun;6(2):140-51. doi: 10.1080/07488009008408920.
9
Palestinian doctors' views on patient-centered care in hospitals.巴勒斯坦医生对医院以患者为中心的护理的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):766. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3573-0.
10
Treatment adherence and outcomes in the management of convulsive status epilepticus in the emergency room.急诊室惊厥性癫痫持续状态管理中的治疗依从性及治疗效果
Epileptic Disord. 2007 Mar;9(1):43-50. doi: 10.1684/epd.2007.0069. Epub 2007 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
War and chronic illness: a health center-based study of Palestinians with non-communicable diseases in Gaza.战争与慢性病:一项基于健康中心对加沙地带患有非传染性疾病的巴勒斯坦人的研究。
Confl Health. 2025 Jun 24;19(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13031-025-00679-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Glycaemic Imbalances in Seizures and Epilepsy of Paediatric Age: A Literature Review.儿童期癫痫发作和癫痫中的血糖失衡:文献综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 29;12(7):2580. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072580.
2
Current Management of Generalized Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Children.儿童全面性惊厥性癫痫持续状态的当前管理
Children (Basel). 2022 Oct 20;9(10):1586. doi: 10.3390/children9101586.
3
Timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus.时机很重要:癫痫持续状态两个时间点之间的短期结局存在显著差异。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Sep 14;22(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02868-y.
4
Programmed mechanisms of status epilepticus-induced neuronal necrosis.癫痫持续状态诱导神经元坏死的程序性机制。
Epilepsia Open. 2023 May;8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S25-S34. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12593. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
5
Epidemiology and Outcomes of Status Epilepticus.癫痫持续状态的流行病学与转归
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Jun 28;14:2965-2973. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S295855. eCollection 2021.
6
Seizures and status epilepticus may be risk factor for cardiac arrhythmia or cardiac arrest across multiple time frames.癫痫发作和癫痫持续状态可能是跨多个时间框架的心律失常或心搏骤停的危险因素。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Jul;120:107998. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107998. Epub 2021 May 12.
7
The Role of Secondary Brain Insults in Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review.继发性脑损伤在癫痫持续状态中的作用:一项系统评价。
J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 5;9(8):2521. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082521.
8
Epidemiology of status epilepticus in adults: Apples, pears, and oranges - A critical review.成人癫痫持续状态的流行病学:苹果、梨和橙子——批判性回顾。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Feb;103(Pt A):106720. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106720. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
9
Randomized Trial of Three Anticonvulsant Medications for Status Epilepticus.随机对照试验三种抗癫痫药物治疗癫痫持续状态。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 28;381(22):2103-2113. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1905795.
10
Cardiac Arrhythmia Following an Epileptic Seizure.癫痫发作后的心律失常。
Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2019 Aug 5;3(4):354-356. doi: 10.5811/cpcem.2019.6.43173. eCollection 2019 Nov.