Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Shanghai TCM College Affiliated Shu Guang Hospital, Shanghai, China.
BMC Urol. 2022 Sep 14;22(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01100-w.
To investigate the outcomes of internal ureteral stents in comparison with ureteroscopy (URS) for pregnant women with urolithiasis.
Relevant studies published from January 1980 to June 2022 were identified through systematic literature searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library.
A total of 499 studies were initially identified. We included pregnant women in any stages of gestation who underwent double-J (D-J) stent insertion only or ureteroscopy for the treatment of urolithiasis; for a study to be included, the number of participants needed to exceed 10. This systematic review was registered on the PROSPERO website (Reference: CRD42020195607).
A total of 25 studies were identified with 131 cases undergoing serial stenting and 789 cases undergoing URS. The pooled operative success rate was 97% for D-J stent insertion and 99% for URS. Only a few patients passed stones spontaneously after serial D-J stenting. The pooled stone free rate (SFR) in URS operations was about 91%. For internal ureteral stent therapy, the rate of normal fertility outcomes was 99%, although the pooled incidence of complications was approximately 45%. For group receiving URS treatment, the rate of normal fertility outcome was 99% and the pooled incidence of complications was approximately 1%. However, the pooled rate of premature birth and abortion were the similar between the two groups (< 1%); the rate of serious complications was also similar between the two groups.
Although internal ureteral stents may cause more minor complications, both ureteroscopy and internal ureteral stents showed had low rates of adverse effects on fertility outcomes when used to treat pregnant women with symptomatic urolithiasis. Evidence suggests that URS may have a greater advantage for pregnant patients with urinary stones when conditions permit. Since, it has been proven to be safe and effective, internal ureteral stents could be considered in emergency or other special situations.
探讨与输尿管镜检查(URS)相比,留置输尿管支架治疗妊娠合并尿路结石的结局。
通过对 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行系统文献检索,确定了 1980 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月期间发表的相关研究。
最初共确定了 499 项研究。我们纳入了任何妊娠阶段接受双 J(D-J)支架置入或输尿管镜检查治疗尿路结石的孕妇;如果研究纳入的患者人数超过 10 例。本系统评价在 PROSPERO 网站上注册(参考:CRD42020195607)。
共确定了 25 项研究,其中 131 例患者接受连续支架置入,789 例患者接受 URS。D-J 支架置入的总体手术成功率为 97%,URS 为 99%。仅有少数患者在连续 D-J 支架置入后自行排石。URS 手术的总体结石清除率(SFR)约为 91%。对于留置输尿管支架治疗,正常生育结局的发生率为 99%,尽管总体并发症发生率约为 45%。对于接受 URS 治疗的组,正常生育结局的发生率为 99%,总体并发症发生率约为 1%。然而,两组早产和流产的发生率相似(<1%);两组严重并发症的发生率也相似。
尽管留置输尿管支架可能会引起更多的轻微并发症,但在治疗有症状的妊娠合并尿路结石的孕妇时,URS 和留置输尿管支架都对生育结局的不良影响发生率较低。有证据表明,在条件允许的情况下,URS 可能对妊娠合并尿路结石的患者更具优势。由于已经证明其安全有效,因此在紧急情况下或其他特殊情况下可以考虑留置输尿管支架。