Jiang Dongting, Xu Gang
Sports Coaching College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Front Physiol. 2022 Aug 29;13:979367. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.979367. eCollection 2022.
The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of the chain squat training (CST) with different chain load ratio (0, 10%, 20% and 30%) on the explosive power of the lower limbs of adolescent male basketball players. Forty-four youth basketball players (age 15.48 ± 0.81 years, body mass 78.86 ± 12.04 kg, height 184.95 ± 6.71 cm) were randomly allocated to one of the four groups: traditional squat training (TST), 10% chains squat training (10% CST), 20% chains squat training (20% CST), and 30% chains squat training (30% CST). Training interventions were performed 2 times per week for 6 weeks, and at the week before (Pre) and after (Post) the 6-week CST program with different chain load ratio, the no-step vertical jump, standing long jump, 15 m shuttle run, 1 R M squat and 30 m sprint test were performed. A 4 (group) × 2 (time) repeated measures analysis of variances (ANOVA) was calculated to show the scatter of each variable, and the Bonferroni's post-hoc test was used for multiple comparisons, in addition the partial eta-squared (η) was calculated as an estimate of the ES. Significant time × group interaction was noticed for the no-step vertical jump ( < 0.001; η = 0.611), standing long jump ( < 0.001; η = 0.490) and 1 R M squat ( < 0.01; η = 0.333) indicating that better improvements appear in CST compared to TST. However, significant time × group interaction was noted for 15 m shuttle run ( < 0.001; η = 0.428), in favor of TST compared to CST. In addition, the improvements in 30 m sprint were similar between all groups. In conclusion, CST with more chain load has better training effects on lower limb explosive strength and maximum strength, based on the improvement in 1 R M squat and jumping performance. Besides, compared with TST, CST with more chain load might not help to develop better velocity adaptation at higher range of movement.
本研究旨在探讨不同链条负荷比例(0、10%、20%和30%)的链式深蹲训练(CST)对青少年男子篮球运动员下肢爆发力的影响。44名青年篮球运动员(年龄15.48±0.81岁,体重78.86±12.04千克,身高184.95±6.71厘米)被随机分配到四组之一:传统深蹲训练(TST)、10%链条深蹲训练(10% CST)、20%链条深蹲训练(20% CST)和30%链条深蹲训练(30% CST)。每周进行2次训练干预,共6周,在6周不同链条负荷比例的CST计划之前(Pre)和之后(Post),进行无步垂直跳、立定跳远、15米穿梭跑、1次重复最大重量深蹲和30米冲刺测试。计算4(组)×2(时间)重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)以显示每个变量的离散情况,并使用Bonferroni事后检验进行多重比较,此外,计算偏 eta 平方(η)作为效应量(ES)的估计值。在无步垂直跳(<0.001;η = 0.611)、立定跳远(<0.001;η = 0.490)和1次重复最大重量深蹲(<0.01;η = 0.333)方面注意到显著的时间×组交互作用,表明与TST相比,CST有更好的改善效果。然而,在15米穿梭跑方面注意到显著的时间×组交互作用(<0.001;η = 0.428),与CST相比,更有利于TST。此外,所有组在30米冲刺方面的改善相似。总之,基于1次重复最大重量深蹲和跳跃成绩的提高,更大链条负荷的CST对下肢爆发力和最大力量有更好的训练效果。此外,与TST相比,更大链条负荷的CST在更高运动范围内可能无助于发展更好的速度适应性。