Suppr超能文献

对比训练和渐进式抗阻训练对亚精英澳式足球运动员力量和相关指标的影响比较。

Comparative Effects of Contrast Training and Progressive Resistance Training on Strength and Power-Related Measures in Subelite Australian Rules Football Players.

机构信息

School of Human Movement and Exercise Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Jul 1;37(7):1440-1448. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004423. Epub 2023 Jan 19.

Abstract

Schneiker, KT, Fyfe, JJ, Teo, SYM, and Bishop, DJ. Comparative effects of contrast training and progressive resistance training on strength and power-related measures in subelite Australian Rules Football players. J Strength Cond Res 37(7): 1440-1448, 2023-The aim of this study was to determine whether contrast training (CST) elicits superior strength-related and power-related outcomes compared with progressive resistance training (PRT). Sixteen male amateur Australian Rules Football players (age, 19 ± 2 years; height, 183 ± 8 cm; body mass, 78.5 ± 8.8 kg; mean ± SD ) completed 2 weeks of standardized resistance training followed by 6 weeks of either CST or PRT. Both CST and PRT improved absolute (20 and 19%) and relative (19 and 16%) 1 repetition maximum (1RM) half squat strength, absolute (8.7 and 8.7%, respectively) and relative (8.2 and 6.1%, respectively) squat jump peak power, and 20-m sprint performance (5.4 and 4.7%, respectively), including both 0 to 5 m (15 and 14%, respectively) and 0 to 10 m (8.6 and 7.5%, respectively) splits. Vertical jump height only improved with CST (6.5%), whereas body mass only increased after PRT (1.9%). There were negative associations between the baseline power-to-strength ratio (PSR) and improvements in both absolute ( r2 = 0.51 and 0.72 for CST and PRT, respectively) and relative ( r2 = 0.65 and 0.60 for CST and PRT, respectively) squat jump peak power. There were no statistically significant (i.e., p ≥ 0.05) between-group differences for all training outcomes. Both interventions improved various strength-related and power-related measures, although a lower baseline PSR was associated with greater improvements in power-related outcomes after both interventions. Contrast training is therefore an effective alternative to progressive resistance training during relatively short-term (6-8 weeks) training periods in young, male, team-sport athletes, particularly in those with a lower power-to-strength ratio.

摘要

施奈克、KT、费弗、JJ、西姆、SYM 和毕晓普、DJ。对比训练和渐进式抗阻训练对亚精英澳式足球运动员力量和相关力量指标的比较效果。J 力量与调节研究 37(7):1440-1448,2023-本研究的目的是确定对比训练(CST)是否比渐进式抗阻训练(PRT)产生更优越的力量相关和力量相关结果。16 名男性业余澳式足球运动员(年龄,19 ± 2 岁;身高,183 ± 8 厘米;体重,78.5 ± 8.8 公斤;平均值 ± 标准差)完成了 2 周的标准化阻力训练,随后进行了 6 周的 CST 或 PRT。CST 和 PRT 均提高了绝对(20%和 19%)和相对(19%和 16%)半蹲 1 次最大重复次数(1RM)力量、绝对(8.7%和 8.7%,分别)和相对(8.2%和 6.1%,分别)深蹲跳峰值功率,以及 20 米冲刺表现(分别为 5.4%和 4.7%),包括 0 到 5 米(分别为 15%和 14%)和 0 到 10 米(分别为 8.6%和 7.5%)。只有 CST 提高了垂直跳跃高度(6.5%),而 PRT 仅增加了体重(1.9%)。基线功率与力量比(PSR)与绝对(CST 和 PRT 分别为 r2=0.51 和 0.72)和相对(CST 和 PRT 分别为 r2=0.65 和 0.60)深蹲跳峰值功率的改善呈负相关。所有训练结果在组间均无统计学差异(即,p≥0.05)。两种干预措施均改善了各种力量相关和力量相关指标,尽管较低的基线 PSR 与两种干预措施后力量相关结果的更大改善相关。因此,在年轻男性团队运动运动员的相对短期(6-8 周)训练期间,CST 是渐进式抗阻训练的有效替代方法,特别是在那些功率与力量比较低的运动员中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验