McLaughlin C G
Health Serv Res. 1987 Jun;22(2):183-205.
A principal problem with previous studies that have estimated the effects of prepaid group practices (PGPs) on hospital costs and use is the treatment of PGP growth rates as an exogenous variable. To the extent that the entry and subsequent growth of PGPs may be affected by high hospital costs and low use, the observed association between hospital costs and use and PGP market shares is confounded. To separate the effects of PGP growth on hospital expenses and use from the effects of hospital expenses and use on PGP growth, a simultaneous-equation model is estimated using data for 25 standard metropolitan statistical areas (SMSAs) from 1972 to 1982. The results indicate that PGP growth has a significant positive effect on average hospital expenses per day and per admission in an SMSA, but no statistically significant effect on average hospital expenses per capita. PGP growth also has a significant negative effect on both admission rates and average length of stay. In contrast to results from single-equation specifications, neither higher hospital expenses per day nor per admission are found to result in higher levels of PGP market shares in an SMSA and, in fact, both lower hospital expenses per capita and lower admission rates lead to significantly higher PGP market share levels.
以往研究在估算预付团体医疗模式(PGP)对医院成本及医疗服务利用的影响时,一个主要问题是将PGP的增长率当作外生变量来处理。在一定程度上,PGP的进入及其后续增长可能受到高医院成本和低医疗服务利用率的影响,那么所观察到的医院成本、医疗服务利用与PGP市场份额之间的关联就会受到混淆。为了将PGP增长对医院费用及医疗服务利用的影响与医院费用及医疗服务利用对PGP增长的影响区分开来,我们使用1972年至1982年期间25个标准大都市统计区(SMSA)的数据,估计了一个联立方程模型。结果表明,PGP增长对SMSA中每天及每次住院的平均医院费用有显著的正向影响,但对人均平均医院费用没有统计学上的显著影响。PGP增长对住院率和平均住院时长也有显著的负向影响。与单方程规范的结果相反,在SMSA中,无论是每天还是每次住院的较高医院费用,都不会导致PGP市场份额水平升高,事实上,人均较低的医院费用和较低的住院率都会导致PGP市场份额水平显著提高。