• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国产前护理的时机:我们的测量有多准确?

Timing of prenatal care in the United States: how accurate are our measurements?

作者信息

Forrest J D, Singh S

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 1987 Jun;22(2):235-53.

PMID:3610653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1065433/
Abstract

Timing of prenatal care has become the most widely used indicator of adequacy of care, largely because it is easy to measure and is obtained by national data collection sources. Because it is a crucial input into setting policy goals, it is important that we have an accurate measure of timing of care. This article reviews the existing level of access to prenatal care, as measured by three different national data sources (Vital Statistics, the National Natality Survey, and the National Survey of Family Growth). Differences among the three sources are discussed; and drawing upon what we know of the problems of data collection, we speculate on the most accurate measure of access to care. Finally, suggestions for improving future data collection are made.

摘要

产前护理的时机已成为衡量护理充分性最广泛使用的指标,主要是因为它易于衡量且可从国家数据收集来源获取。由于它是制定政策目标的关键要素,因此准确衡量护理时机非常重要。本文回顾了通过三种不同国家数据来源(生命统计、全国出生调查和全国家庭成长调查)衡量的现有产前护理可及水平。讨论了这三种来源之间的差异;并根据我们对数据收集问题的了解,推测了衡量护理可及性的最准确方法。最后,提出了改进未来数据收集的建议。

相似文献

1
Timing of prenatal care in the United States: how accurate are our measurements?美国产前护理的时机:我们的测量有多准确?
Health Serv Res. 1987 Jun;22(2):235-53.
2
Prenatal care in the United States, 1980-94.1980 - 1994年美国的产前护理
Vital Health Stat 21 Data Natal Marriage Divorce. 1996 Jul(54):1-17.
3
Comparability of the birth certificate and 1988 Maternal and Infant Health Survey.出生证明与1988年母婴健康调查的可比性。
Vital Health Stat 2. 1993 Mar(116):1-19.
4
Comparability of reporting between the birth certificate and the 1980 National Natality Survey.出生证明与1980年全国出生情况调查之间报告的可比性。
Vital Health Stat 2. 1985 Nov(99):1-34.
5
The need for prenatal care in the United States: evidence from the 1980 National Natality Survey.美国产前护理的必要性:来自1980年全国出生情况调查的证据。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1985 May-Jun;17(3):118-24.
6
Why we know so little about prenatal care nationwide: an assessment of required methodology.为何我们对全国范围内的产前护理知之甚少:所需方法的评估。
Health Serv Res. 1988 Aug;23(3):359-80.
7
Uses of the 1980 National Natality and Fetal Mortality Surveys for the assessment of obstetric technologies.利用1980年全国出生与胎儿死亡情况调查评估产科技术。
Isr J Med Sci. 1986 Jul-Aug;22(7-8):529-40.
8
Obstetricians' receptiveness to teen prenatal patients who are Medicaid recipients.产科医生对接受医疗补助的青少年产前患者的接纳程度。
Health Serv Res. 1997 Aug;32(3):265-82.
9
The 1980 National Natality Survey and National Fetal Mortality Survey--methods used and PHS agency participation.1980年全国出生情况调查和全国胎儿死亡情况调查——所采用的方法及公共卫生服务机构的参与情况。
Public Health Rep. 1984 Mar-Apr;99(2):111-6.
10
Prenatal care initiation among pregnant teens in the United States: an analysis over 25 years.美国青少年孕妇的产前护理起始情况:25年分析
J Adolesc Health. 2008 Mar;42(3):243-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.027. Epub 2008 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for late or no prenatal care following Medicaid expansions in California.加利福尼亚州医疗补助扩大后晚期或未接受产前护理的风险因素。
Matern Child Health J. 2000 Dec;4(4):251-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1026647722295.
2
The prevalence of low income among childbearing women in California: implications for the private and public sectors.加利福尼亚州育龄妇女低收入的普遍程度:对私营和公共部门的影响。
Am J Public Health. 1999 Jun;89(6):868-74. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.6.868.
3
A comparison of prenatal care use in the United States and Europe.美国与欧洲产前护理使用情况的比较。
Am J Public Health. 1993 Jan;83(1):31-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.1.31.
4
The quality of the new birth certificate data: a validation study in North Carolina.新出生证明数据的质量:北卡罗来纳州的一项验证研究。
Am J Public Health. 1993 Aug;83(8):1163-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.8.1163.
5
An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index.对凯斯纳产前护理充分性指数及一项提议的产前护理利用充分性指数的评估。
Am J Public Health. 1994 Sep;84(9):1414-20. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.9.1414.
6
Problems in estimating the number of women in need of subsidized prenatal care.估算需要获得补贴产前护理的女性人数方面存在的问题。
Public Health Rep. 1991 May-Jun;106(3):333-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Levels of gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase in cultured skin fibroblasts from cystinotics and normals.胱氨酸病患者和正常人培养的皮肤成纤维细胞中γ-谷氨酰转肽酶的水平。
Life Sci. 1980 Nov 24;27(21):1985-90. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(80)90419-1.
2
The need for prenatal care in the United States: evidence from the 1980 National Natality Survey.美国产前护理的必要性:来自1980年全国出生情况调查的证据。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1985 May-Jun;17(3):118-24.