RAND Health Care, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Muscle Nerve. 2023 Jan;67(1):52-62. doi: 10.1002/mus.27718. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: In prior work, higher quality care for work-associated carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) was associated with improved symptoms, functional status, and overall health. We sought to examine whether quality of care is associated with healthcare expenditures or disability.
Among 343 adults with workers' compensation claims for CTS, we created patient-level aggregate quality scores for underuse (not receiving highly beneficial care) and overuse (receiving care for which risks exceed benefits). We assessed whether each aggregate quality score (0%-100%, 100% = better care) was associated with healthcare expenditures (18-mo expenditures, any anticipated need for future expenditures) or disability (days on temporary disability, permanent impairment rating at 18 mo).
Mean aggregate quality scores were 77.8% (standard deviation [SD] 16.5%) for underuse and 89.2% (SD 11.0%) for overuse. An underuse score of 100% was associated with higher risk-adjusted 18-mo expenditures ($3672; 95% confidence interval [CI] $324 to $7021) but not with future expenditures (-0.07 percentage points; 95% CI -0.48 to 0.34), relative to a score of 0%. An overuse score of 100% was associated with lower 18-mo expenditures (-$4549, 95% CI -$8792 to -$306) and a modestly lower likelihood of future expenditures (-0.62 percentage points, 95% CI -1.23 to -0.02). Quality of care was not associated with disability.
Improving quality of care could increase or lower short-term healthcare expenditures, depending on how often care is currently underused or overused. Future research is needed on quality of care in varied workers' compensation contexts, as well as effective and economical strategies for improving quality.
简介/目的:在之前的研究中,为工作相关腕管综合征(CTS)提供更高质量的护理与改善症状、功能状态和整体健康相关。我们试图研究护理质量是否与医疗保健支出或残疾有关。
在 343 名因 CTS 提出工人赔偿申请的成年人中,我们为低估(未接受高收益护理)和高估(接受风险大于收益的护理)制定了患者层面的综合质量评分。我们评估了每个综合质量评分(0%-100%,100%=更好的护理)是否与医疗保健支出(18 个月的支出、未来任何预期支出需求)或残疾(临时残疾天数、18 个月时的永久性损伤评级)相关。
低估的平均综合质量评分为 77.8%(标准差[SD] 16.5%),高估的为 89.2%(SD 11.0%)。100%的低估评分与调整后的 18 个月医疗支出较高相关(3672 美元;95%置信区间[CI]为 324 美元至 7021 美元),但与未来支出无关(0.07 个百分点;95%CI 为-0.48 至 0.34),与评分为 0%相比。100%的高估评分与 18 个月的医疗支出较低相关(-4549 美元,95%CI 为-8792 美元至-306 美元),且未来支出的可能性略低(-0.62 个百分点,95%CI 为-1.23 至-0.02)。护理质量与残疾无关。
根据护理目前低估或高估的频率,提高护理质量可能会增加或降低短期医疗保健支出。未来需要在不同工人赔偿背景下研究护理质量,以及制定提高质量的有效和经济策略。