Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Department of Family and Child Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Sep 15;10(Suppl 1). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00714.
The Integrated District Evidence-to-Action program is an audit and feedback intervention introduced in 2017 in Manica and Sofala provinces, Mozambique, to reduce mortality in children younger than 5 years. We describe barriers and facilitators to early-stage effectiveness of that intervention.
We embedded the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) into an extended case study design to inform sampling, data collection, analysis, and interpretation. We collected data in 4 districts in Manica and Sofala Provinces in November 2018. Data collection included document review, 22 in-depth individual interviews, and 2 focus group discussions (FGDs) with 19 provincial, district, and facility managers and nurses. Most participants (70.2%) were nurses and facility managers and the majority were women (87.8%). We audio-recorded all but 2 interviews and FGDs and conducted a consensus-based iterative analysis.
Facilitators of effective intervention implementation included: implementation of the core intervention components of audit and feedback meetings, supportive supervision and mentorship, and small grants as originally planned; positive pressure from district managers and study nurses on health facility staff to strive for excellence; and easy access to knowledge and information about the intervention. Implementation barriers were the intervention's lack of compatibility in not addressing the scarcity of human and financial resources and inadequate infrastructures for maternal and child health services at district and facility levels and; the intervention's lack of adaptability in having little flexibility in the design and decision making about the use of intervention funds and data collection tools.
Our comprehensive and systematic use of the CFIR within an extended case study design generated granular evidence on CFIR's contribution to implementation science efforts to describe determinants of early-stage intervention implementation. It also provided baseline findings to assess subsequent implementation phases, considering similarities and differences in barriers and facilitators across study districts and facilities. Sharing preliminary findings with stakeholders promoted timely decision making about intervention implementation.
综合区域循证行动(IDEA)项目是 2017 年在莫桑比克马尼卡省和索法拉省推出的一项审计和反馈干预措施,旨在降低 5 岁以下儿童死亡率。我们描述了该干预措施早期有效性的障碍和促进因素。
我们将实施综合框架(CFIR)嵌入到扩展的案例研究设计中,以提供采样、数据收集、分析和解释的信息。我们于 2018 年 11 月在马尼卡省和索法拉省的 4 个地区收集数据。数据收集包括文件审查、22 次深度个人访谈和 2 次焦点小组讨论(FGD),参与者包括省级、地区和设施管理人员以及护士。大多数参与者(70.2%)是护士和设施管理人员,大多数是女性(87.8%)。除了 2 次访谈和 FGD 外,我们都进行了录音,并进行了基于共识的迭代分析。
有效干预实施的促进因素包括:按照最初的计划实施审计和反馈会议、支持性监督和指导以及小额赠款等核心干预措施;区经理和研究护士对卫生机构工作人员施加积极的压力,要求他们追求卓越;以及方便获取关于干预措施的知识和信息。实施障碍包括干预措施缺乏兼容性,无法解决人力资源和财政资源短缺以及地区和设施级别的母婴保健服务基础设施不足的问题;干预措施缺乏适应性,在干预资金和数据收集工具的使用方面几乎没有设计和决策的灵活性。
我们在扩展的案例研究设计中综合和系统地使用 CFIR,对 CFIR 对描述早期干预实施决定因素的实施科学努力的贡献提供了详细的证据。它还提供了基线发现,以评估随后的实施阶段,考虑到研究地区和设施之间障碍和促进因素的相似性和差异性。与利益相关者分享初步发现有助于及时做出干预实施决策。