Nagappan Nagappan, Ejaj M Mohamed, D'cruz Thomson Mariadasan, Subbiah Gireesh Kumar, Tajuddin Rameezuddin, Subbiah Krithika
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Chettinad Dental College and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, CSI College of Dental Science and Research Institute, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022 Jul;14(Suppl 1):S995-S999. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_819_21. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
Oral diseases have a strong history of treating by natural remedies. Chemical plaque reduction techniques, including dental mouthwashes, are intriguing because they can help patients who are unable to maintain appropriate mechanical plaque management. They are a less technically difficult alternative to mechanical control.
This study aimed to compare the antibacterial efficacy of an herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinse against .
The antimicrobial effectiveness (zone of inhibition) of an herbal mouthrinse and chlorhexidine mouthrinse was determined by agar well diffusion method.
The zone of inhibition for control mouthrinse was 19 mm, and there was no zone of inhibition observed for the experimental mouthrinse.
The result of this investigation suggests 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate has a better antimicrobial activity than herbal mouthrinse.
口腔疾病采用天然疗法治疗由来已久。包括漱口水在内的化学性减少牙菌斑技术颇具吸引力，因为它们能帮助那些无法维持适当机械性牙菌斑管理的患者。与机械控制相比，它们在技术上难度较小。
本研究旨在比较一种草药漱口水和0.2%葡萄糖酸氯己定漱口水对……的抗菌效果。
采用琼脂孔扩散法测定草药漱口水和氯己定漱口水的抗菌效果（抑菌圈）。
对照漱口水的抑菌圈为19毫米，实验漱口水未观察到抑菌圈。
本研究结果表明，0.2%葡萄糖酸氯己定的抗菌活性优于草药漱口水。
Zotero 插件
