Suppr超能文献

有或无底漆的金属与陶瓷托槽粘结强度的比较

Comparison of Bond Strength of Metal and Ceramic Brackets with or without Primer.

作者信息

Sharma Shreya, Pandit Susmita K, Das Rohan, Sinha Moumita, Sahu Rajalaxmi, Trivedi Pragya

机构信息

Senior Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics Awadh Dental College and Hospital Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India.

PG Student, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics Awadh Dental College and Hospital Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022 Jul;14(Suppl 1):S225-S228. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_143_22. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bonding is an integral part of orthodontic treatment. Orthodontic bonding could be accomplished without the use of primer, it might be possible to reduce the risk of occupational exposure to primer and will save time. So it is very important to know whether primer is required or not.

AIM

The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of metallic and ceramic brackets bonded with and without primer application and to check for residual adhesive post debonding.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A total of 100 extracted human premolar teeth were divided into 2 main groups A and B which were further subdivided into: Group A1 - metallic brackets bonded with primer; Group A2 - ceramic brackets bonded with primer; Group B1 - metallic brackets bonded without primer; group B2 - ceramic brackets bonded without primer. The SBS of these brackets was measured.

RESULT

The SBS of group A2 was significantly higher than the other groups, group A1 was the second highest, group B3 was the third highest and group B4 was the least significant. The adhesive remnant index was lowest on failure of ceramic brackets bonded with primer.

CONCLUSION

SBS of ceramic brackets bonded without primer is superior to SBS of metallic bracket bonded without primer and metallic brackets bonded with primer was superior than metallic bonded without primer.

摘要

背景

粘结是正畸治疗不可或缺的一部分。正畸粘结可以不使用底漆来完成,这样有可能降低职业接触底漆的风险并节省时间。因此,了解是否需要底漆非常重要。

目的

本研究的目的是评估和比较使用和不使用底漆粘结的金属和陶瓷托槽的剪切粘结强度(SBS),并检查脱粘后的残余粘结剂。

材料与方法

总共100颗拔除的人类前磨牙被分为2个主要组A和B,每组再进一步细分:A1组 - 使用底漆粘结的金属托槽;A2组 - 使用底漆粘结的陶瓷托槽;B1组 - 不使用底漆粘结的金属托槽;B2组 - 不使用底漆粘结的陶瓷托槽。测量这些托槽的SBS。

结果

A2组的SBS显著高于其他组,A1组第二高,B3组第三高,B4组最低。使用底漆粘结的陶瓷托槽脱粘时的粘结残留指数最低。

结论

不使用底漆粘结的陶瓷托槽的SBS优于不使用底漆粘结的金属托槽,使用底漆粘结的金属托槽优于不使用底漆粘结的金属托槽。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Bond Strength of Metal and Ceramic Brackets with or without Primer.有或无底漆的金属与陶瓷托槽粘结强度的比较
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022 Jul;14(Suppl 1):S225-S228. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_143_22. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

本文引用的文献

8
Retrospective study of orthodontic bonding without liquid resin.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Sep;118(3):300-6. doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.103772.
9
Enamel sealants: a clinical evaluation of their value during fixed appliance therapy.
Eur J Orthod. 1994 Feb;16(1):19-25. doi: 10.1093/ejo/16.1.19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验