Suppr超能文献

参与类风湿性关节炎临床预防试验的偏好与见解:一项混合方法研究

Preferences and Insights for Participation in a Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Prevention Trial: A Mixed-Methods Study.

作者信息

Fleischer Chelsie L, Bemis Elizabeth A, Feser Marie L, Kormendi Vasilisa A, Zhang Alvina, Ketcham Katherine, White Sharon D, Striebich Christopher C, Deane Kevin D, Harrison Mark

机构信息

University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.

University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, and Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

ACR Open Rheumatol. 2022 Nov;4(11):974-982. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11500. Epub 2022 Sep 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) can be elevated prior to inflammatory arthritis (IA). The potential to intervene in people with ACPA positivity underpins the development of prevention trials in RA. The Research Participation Influences Study examined factors influencing the decisions of individuals who are ACPA(+) to participate in a prevention trial using qualitative and quantitative methods.

METHODS

Individuals with ACPA positivity without IA were provided information regarding their risk for future RA, were provided a description of a clinical prevention trial using hydroxychloroquine, and were asked if they would participate in the trial. After agreeing to or declining participation, they were surveyed on what influenced their decision using Likert scales and open-response questions.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine individuals who agreed to trial participation (enrollees) and 31 individuals who declined (nonenrollees) completed surveys. Enrollees expressed greater perceived risk for RA and greater perception of benefit to themselves or others than nonenrollees. Nonenrollees expressed greater concern about medication effects and less personal or family experience with RA than enrollees. There was a higher proportion of first-degree relatives (FDRs) of people with RA in enrollees versus nonenrollees (54% vs. 23%, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Enrollees were more likely than nonenrollees to be FDRs, exhibit stronger concern for personal risk for RA, and have less concern about adverse effects. Further exploration is needed to determine why these differences were present, including exploration of symptoms and the role of family history. Understanding these issues will better inform researchers and individuals who are candidates for prevention.

摘要

目的

在类风湿关节炎(RA)中,抗瓜氨酸化蛋白抗体(ACPA)在炎性关节炎(IA)出现之前就可能升高。对ACPA阳性人群进行干预的可能性为RA预防试验的开展提供了依据。研究参与影响研究使用定性和定量方法,考察了影响ACPA阳性个体参与预防试验决策的因素。

方法

向无IA的ACPA阳性个体提供有关其未来患RA风险的信息,描述一项使用羟氯喹的临床预防试验,并询问他们是否愿意参加该试验。在同意或拒绝参与后,使用李克特量表和开放式问题对他们进行调查,了解影响其决策的因素。

结果

39名同意参与试验的个体(参与者)和31名拒绝参与的个体(非参与者)完成了调查。与非参与者相比,参与者对RA的感知风险更高,对自身或他人的益处感知更强。非参与者比参与者更担心药物副作用,且个人或家族患RA的经历更少。参与者中RA患者的一级亲属(FDRs)比例高于非参与者(54%对23%,P = 0.01)。

结论

与非参与者相比,参与者更有可能是FDRs,对自身患RA的风险更为关注,对不良反应的担忧更少。需要进一步探究为何存在这些差异,包括探究症状以及家族史的作用。了解这些问题将为研究人员和预防试验候选个体提供更好的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c630/9661822/d00bc55fc820/ACR2-4-974-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验