Suppr超能文献

微创与开放肾切除术 1 年后的医疗保健支出和利用比较。

Comparison of 1-Year Health Care Expenditures and Utilization Following Minimally Invasive vs Open Nephrectomy.

机构信息

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Intuitive Surgical Inc, Sunnyvale, California.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2231885. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31885.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Given the widespread adoption and clinical benefits of minimally invasive surgery approaches (MIS) in partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN), assessment of long-term cost implications is relevant.

OBJECTIVE

To compare health care utilization and expenditures within 1 year after MIS and open surgery (OS).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study was conducted using a US commercial claims database between 2013 and 2018. A total of 5104 patients aged 18 to 64 years who underwent PN or RN for kidney cancer and were continuously insured for 180 days before and 365 days after surgery were identified. An inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was performed to examine differences in costs and use of health care services.

EXPOSURES

Surgical approach (MIS or OS).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Outcomes assessed included 1-year total health care expenditure, health care utilizations, and estimated days missed from work.

RESULTS

Of the 5104 patients, 2639 had PN (2008 MIS vs 631 OS) and 2465 had RN (1816 MIS vs 649 OS) and most were male (PN: 1657 [62.8%]; RN: 399 [63.1%]) and between 55 and 64 years of age (PN: 1034 [51.3%]; RN: 320 [55.7%]). Patients who underwent MIS had lower index hospital length of stay compared with OS (mean [95% CI] for PN: 2.45 [2.37-2.53] vs 3.78 [3.60-3.97] days; P < .001; for RN: 2.82 [2.73-2.91] vs 4.62 [4.41-4.83] days; P < .001), and lower index expenditure for RN ($28 999 [$28 243-$29 796] vs $31 977 [$30 729-$33 329]; P < .001). For PN, index expenditure was lower for OS than MIS (mean [95% CI], $27 480 [$26 263-$28 753] vs $30 380 [$29614-$31 167]; P < .001). Patients with MIS had lower 1-year postdischarge readmission rate (PN: 15.1% vs 21.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52-0.82; P < .001; RN: 15.6% vs 18.9%; OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-1.00; P = .05), and fewer hospital outpatient visits (mean [95% CI] for PN: 4.69 [4.48-4.90] vs 5.25 [4.84-5.66]; P = .01; RN: 5.50 [5.21-5.80] vs 6.71 [6.12-7.30]; P < .001) than those with OS. For RN, MIS was associated with 1.47 fewer missed workdays (95% CI, 0.57-2.38 days; P = .001). The reduction in health care use in MIS was associated with lower or similar total cumulative expenditures compared with OS (mean difference [95% CI] for PN: $331 [-$3250 to $3912]; P = .85; for RN: -$11 265 [-$17 065 to -$5465]; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, MIS was associated with lower or similar total cumulative expenditure than OS in the period 1 year after discharge from the index surgery. These findings suggest that downstream expenditures and resource utilization should be considered when evaluating surgical approach for nephrectomy.

摘要

重要性:鉴于微创外科方法(MIS)在部分肾切除术(PN)和根治性肾切除术(RN)中的广泛应用和临床获益,评估长期成本影响是相关的。

目的:比较 MIS 和开放手术(OS)后 1 年内的医疗保健利用和支出。

设计、设置和参与者:本队列研究使用了美国商业索赔数据库,时间范围为 2013 年至 2018 年。共纳入了 5104 名年龄在 18 至 64 岁之间、因肾癌接受 PN 或 RN 且在手术前 180 天和手术后 365 天内连续投保的患者。采用逆概率治疗加权分析来比较成本和医疗保健服务的使用差异。

暴露:手术方法(MIS 或 OS)。

主要结果和措施:评估的结果包括 1 年总医疗保健支出、医疗保健利用情况以及估计的误工天数。

结果:在 5104 名患者中,2639 名接受了 PN(2008 例 MIS 与 631 例 OS),2465 名接受了 RN(1816 例 MIS 与 649 例 OS),大多数患者为男性(PN:1657 [62.8%];RN:399 [63.1%]),年龄在 55 至 64 岁之间(PN:1034 [51.3%];RN:320 [55.7%])。与 OS 相比,接受 MIS 的患者的指数住院时间更短(PN:平均[95%CI]为 2.45[2.37-2.53] vs 3.78[3.60-3.97]天;P<.001;RN:平均[95%CI]为 2.82[2.73-2.91] vs 4.62[4.41-4.83]天;P<.001),并且 RN 的指数支出也较低($28999 [$28243-$29796] vs $31977 [$30729-$33329];P<.001)。对于 PN,OS 的指数支出低于 MIS(平均[95%CI],$27480 [$26263-$28614] vs $30380 [$29614-$31167];P<.001)。接受 MIS 的患者出院后 1 年内再入院率较低(PN:15.1% vs 21.5%;比值比[OR],0.65;95%CI,0.52-0.82;P<.001;RN:15.6% vs 18.9%;OR,0.79;95%CI,0.63-1.00;P=0.05),并且门诊就诊次数较少(PN:平均[95%CI]为 4.69[4.48-4.90] vs 5.25[4.84-5.66];P=0.01;RN:平均[95%CI]为 5.50[5.21-5.80] vs 6.71[6.12-7.30];P<.001)。与 OS 相比,接受 RN 的患者少缺勤 1.47 天(95%CI,0.57-2.38 天;P=0.001)。MIS 减少了医疗保健的使用,与 OS 相比,总累计支出更低或相似(PN:平均差异[95%CI]为 $331 [-$3250 至 $3912];P=.85;RN:平均差异[95%CI]为 -$11265 [-$17065 至 -$5465];P<.001)。

结论和相关性:在这项队列研究中,与 OS 相比,MIS 术后 1 年出院后的总累计支出较低或相似。这些发现表明,在评估肾切除术的手术方法时,应考虑下游支出和资源利用情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验