Suppr超能文献

磁共振成像与锥形束计算机断层扫描中牙槽骨测量的比较:一项初步研究。

Alveolar bone measurements in magnetic resonance imaging compared with cone beam computed tomography: a pilot, study.

作者信息

Fuglsig João Marcus de Carvalho E Silva, Hansen Brian, Schropp Lars, Nixdorf Donald R, Wenzel Ann, Spin-Neto Rubens

机构信息

Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Section for Oral Radiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Odontol Scand. 2023 Apr;81(3):241-248. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2022.2121321. Epub 2022 Sep 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare alveolar bone height and width measurements from zero-echo-time MRI (ZTE-MRI) and cone beam CT (CBCT), in human specimens.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty posterior edentulous sites in human cadaver specimens were imaged with CBCT and ZTE-MRI. Bone height and width at 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 mm from the top of the alveolar ridge was measured by two trained observers in cross-sections of a site where an implant was to be planned. Twenty percent of the sample was measured in duplicate to assess method error and intra-observer reproducibility (ICC). The differences between CBCT and ZTE-MRI measurements were compared (-test).

RESULTS

Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility was >0.90. The method error (average between observers) for bone height was 0.45 mm and 0.39 mm, and for bone width (average) was 0.52 mm and 0.80 mm (CBCT and ZTE-MRI, respectively). The majority of the bone measurement differences were statistically insignificant, except bone width measurements at 5 mm ( ≤ .05 for both observers). Mean measurement differences were not larger than the method error.

CONCLUSION

ZTE-MRI is not significantly different from CBCT when comparing measurements of alveolar bone height and width.

摘要

目的

比较人体标本中零回波时间磁共振成像(ZTE-MRI)和锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)测量的牙槽骨高度和宽度。

材料与方法

对20个来自人体尸体标本的后牙无牙区进行CBCT和ZTE-MRI成像。在计划植入种植体部位的横断面上,由两名经过培训的观察者测量距牙槽嵴顶部1、3、5、7和9毫米处的骨高度和宽度。对20%的样本进行重复测量,以评估方法误差和观察者内重复性(ICC)。比较CBCT和ZTE-MRI测量值之间的差异(t检验)。

结果

观察者间和观察者内的重复性>0.90。骨高度的方法误差(观察者之间的平均值)为0.45毫米和0.39毫米,骨宽度的方法误差(平均值)为0.52毫米和0.80毫米(分别为CBCT和ZTE-MRI)。除了5毫米处的骨宽度测量值外,大多数骨测量差异在统计学上不显著(两位观察者的P值均≤0.05)。平均测量差异不大于方法误差。

结论

在比较牙槽骨高度和宽度测量值时,ZTE-MRI与CBCT没有显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验