Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉旁路手术后单药阿司匹林与双联抗血小板治疗的安全性比较。

Safety Comparison of Monotherapy Aspirin to Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, 6915Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Department of Pharmacy, 611758Sanford Health, Fargo, ND, USA.

出版信息

Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2022 Jan-Dec;28:10760296221124902. doi: 10.1177/10760296221124902.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is recommended over single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) in patients following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The compilation of evidence has focused on the efficacy of DAPT to limit risk of graft occlusion, however the safety, especially in the on-pump CABG population, is less well described. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of DAPT versus SAPT after on-pump CABG.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective cohort analysis of adult patients following isolated on-pump CABG between January 2012 and December 2019 not on oral anticoagulation at discharge. The primary endpoint was occurrence of a composite bleeding event identified by pre-specified ICD codes. Secondary endpoints consisted of 30-day and 1-year mortalities along with individual bleeding components.

RESULTS

Of the 2341 patients included 1250 patients were in the SAPT arm and 1091 patients in the DAPT arm. The study populations differed by age, prior MI, PAD, and CHF status/stage. Bleeding events occurred in a total of 70 patients (3.0%), with 36 patients (2.9%) in the SAPT arm and 34 patients (3.1%) in the DAPT arm ( = .74). 30-day (SAPT 0.7% vs DAPT 0.4%) and 1-year (SAPT 3.3% vs DAPT 2.3%) mortality were not significantly different between groups. The most frequent bleed event was in the gastrointestinal tract.

CONCLUSION

In this study, DAPT was not associated with an increase in composite bleeding compared to SAPT. This study could reduce the barrier to prescribing of DAPT given previous efficacy data.

摘要

背景

在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后,双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)优于单联抗血小板治疗(SAPT)。证据的编纂重点是 DAPT 限制移植物闭塞风险的疗效,然而,安全性,特别是在体外循环 CABG 人群中,描述得较少。本研究旨在评估体外循环 CABG 后 DAPT 与 SAPT 的安全性。

方法

这是一项对 2012 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间接受单纯体外循环 CABG 且出院时未接受口服抗凝治疗的成年患者的单中心回顾性队列分析。主要终点是通过预先指定的 ICD 编码确定复合出血事件的发生。次要终点包括 30 天和 1 年死亡率以及各出血成分。

结果

在 2341 例患者中,1250 例患者在 SAPT 组,1091 例患者在 DAPT 组。研究人群在年龄、既往心肌梗死、PAD 和 CHF 状态/阶段方面存在差异。出血事件共发生在 70 例患者(3.0%),SAPT 组 36 例(2.9%),DAPT 组 34 例(3.1%)( = .74)。30 天(SAPT 0.7% vs DAPT 0.4%)和 1 年(SAPT 3.3% vs DAPT 2.3%)死亡率在两组之间无显著差异。最常见的出血事件发生在胃肠道。

结论

在本研究中,与 SAPT 相比,DAPT 并未增加复合出血。鉴于先前的疗效数据,本研究可能降低了开具 DAPT 的障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6e5/9478706/2404d578954d/10.1177_10760296221124902-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验