• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1 L 与 2 L 聚乙二醇联合维生素 C 行结肠镜肠道准备的效果和安全性:一项随机对照试验。

Bowel Preparation Efficacy and Safety of 1 L vs 2 L Polyethylene Glycol With Ascorbic Acid for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar 1;14(3):e00532. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000532.

DOI:10.14309/ctg.0000000000000532
PMID:36113016
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10043589/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid (PEG/Asc) is a well-established bowel preparation solution with guaranteed effectiveness and safety. A new low-volume agent, 1 L-PEG/Asc, has recently been released. This study aimed to compare the bowel cleansing efficacy and safety of 1 L-PEG/Asc and 2 L-PEG/Asc administered to adult outpatients in a split-dose manner.

METHODS

Outpatients undergoing colonoscopy enrolled in a single-blinded, single-center, noninferiority study conducted between July and October 2021 were randomized in a 1:1 manner to a 1 L-PEG/Asc or 2 L-PEG/Asc group. Bowel cleansing was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and the Harefield Cleansing Scale in intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty participants were randomized and allocated, with 120 patients in the 1 L and 2 L-PEG/Asc groups, respectively. Noninferiority was demonstrated for overall successful bowel cleansing (BBPS: 92.5% vs 90.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.054 to 0.087) and the high-quality cleansing rate of the right-sided colon (BBPS = 3, 40.0% vs 35.8%; 95% CI, -0.082 to 0.165; Harefield Cleansing Scale ≥3, 50.0% vs 43.3%; 95% CI, -0.060 to 0.194) in the intention-to-treat population. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups ([82/120] 68.3% vs [72/120] 60.0%; P = 0.178). The tolerability, acceptability, and compliance rates of both regimens were similar, with no significant differences.

DISCUSSION

Compared with 2 L-PEG/Asc, 1 L-PEG/Asc achieved successful overall bowel cleansing efficacy with high-quality cleansing in the proximal colon and proved its noninferiority. Therefore, 1 L-PEG/Asc is an acceptable alternative bowel cleansing solution.

摘要

介绍

聚乙二醇联合维生素 C(PEG/Asc)是一种成熟的肠道准备溶液,具有良好的有效性和安全性。一种新的低容量制剂,1 L-PEG/Asc,最近已被推出。本研究旨在比较成人门诊患者应用 1 L-PEG/Asc 和 2 L-PEG/Asc 进行分剂量给药的肠道清洁效果和安全性。

方法

在 2021 年 7 月至 10 月进行的单盲、单中心、非劣效性研究中,入组的门诊患者被随机以 1:1 的比例分配至 1 L-PEG/Asc 组或 2 L-PEG/Asc 组。采用波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)和 Harefield 肠道清洁量表在意向治疗和符合方案人群中评估肠道清洁效果。

结果

共纳入 240 名患者并进行随机分组,每组各 120 例患者。总体上,1 L-PEG/Asc 组的肠道清洁成功率与 2 L-PEG/Asc 组相当(BBPS:92.5% vs 90.8%;95%置信区间[CI],-0.054 至 0.087),且右侧结肠的高质量清洁率也相似(BBPS = 3,40.0% vs 35.8%;95%CI,-0.082 至 0.165;Harefield 肠道清洁量表≥3,50.0% vs 43.3%;95%CI,-0.060 至 0.194)。在意向治疗人群中,两组的不良反应总发生率相似([82/120] 68.3% vs [72/120] 60.0%;P = 0.178)。两种方案的耐受性、可接受性和依从性率也相似,无显著差异。

讨论

与 2 L-PEG/Asc 相比,1 L-PEG/Asc 实现了整体肠道清洁效果的非劣效性,且高质量清洁了近端结肠。因此,1 L-PEG/Asc 是一种可接受的替代肠道清洁溶液。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9513/10043589/55ec0e039229/ct9-14-e00532-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9513/10043589/38dadb96dc67/ct9-14-e00532-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9513/10043589/55ec0e039229/ct9-14-e00532-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9513/10043589/38dadb96dc67/ct9-14-e00532-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9513/10043589/55ec0e039229/ct9-14-e00532-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Bowel Preparation Efficacy and Safety of 1 L vs 2 L Polyethylene Glycol With Ascorbic Acid for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.1 L 与 2 L 聚乙二醇联合维生素 C 行结肠镜肠道准备的效果和安全性:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar 1;14(3):e00532. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000532.
2
Comparison of a split-dose bowel preparation with 2 liters of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and 1 liter of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and bisacodyl before colonoscopy.结肠镜检查前,对比 2 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 与 1 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 和比沙可啶的分剂量肠道准备。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Aug;86(2):343-348. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.040. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
3
Novel 1-L polyethylene glycol + ascorbate versus high-volume polyethylene glycol regimen for colonoscopy cleansing: a multicenter, randomized, phase IV study.新型 1-L 聚乙二醇+抗坏血酸盐与高容量聚乙二醇方案用于结肠镜检查清洁:一项多中心、随机、四期研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Oct;94(4):823-831.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.04.020. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
4
Efficacy of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate versus 4 L polyethylene glycol in split-dose for colonoscopy cleansing in out and inpatient: A multicentre, randomized trial (OVER 2019).1L 聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸与 4L 聚乙二醇在门诊和住院患者结肠镜检查清洁中的疗效比较:一项多中心、随机试验(OVER 2019)。
Dig Liver Dis. 2024 Mar;56(3):495-501. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.07.032. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
5
Effectiveness of very low-volume preparation for colonoscopy: A prospective, multicenter observational study.结肠镜检查前极低容量准备的效果:一项前瞻性、多中心观察性研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 28;26(16):1950-1961. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i16.1950.
6
1 L- versus 2 L-polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in elderly patients: a randomized multicenter study.1 L-与 2 L-聚乙二醇联合抗坏血酸在老年患者肠道准备中的应用:一项随机多中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):5724-5733. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08947-4. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
7
Improving the tolerability and safety of 1-L polyethylene glycol plus low-dose ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in a healthy population: a randomized multicenter clinical trial.提高健康人群中 1-L 聚乙二醇加低剂量抗坏血酸用于肠道准备的耐受性和安全性:一项随机多中心临床试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Aug;96(2):341-350.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
8
Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulfate tablet versus 2 L-polyethylene glycol/ascorbate for bowel preparation in older patients: prospective, multicenter, investigator single-blinded, randomized study.口服硫酸盐片与 2 L 聚乙二醇/抗坏血酸在老年患者肠道准备中的疗效、耐受性和安全性:前瞻性、多中心、研究者单盲、随机研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2024 May;59(5):402-410. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02089-9. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
9
Efficacy and tolerability of 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate: a randomized controlled trial.2-L聚乙二醇与抗坏血酸对比比沙可啶肠溶片与枸橼酸镁的疗效及耐受性:一项随机对照试验
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 May;33(5):541-548. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-2989-7. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
10
Efficacy and safety of split-dose bowel preparation with 1 L polyethylene glycol and ascorbate compared with 2 L polyethylene glycol and ascorbate in a Korean population: a phase IV, multicenter, randomized, endoscopist-blinded study.在韩国人群中,1 L 聚乙二醇和抗坏血酸与 2 L 聚乙二醇和抗坏血酸相比,分剂量肠道准备的疗效和安全性:一项四期、多中心、随机、内镜盲法研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Mar;95(3):500-511.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.09.041. Epub 2021 Oct 12.