• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口服硫酸盐片与 2 L 聚乙二醇/抗坏血酸在老年患者肠道准备中的疗效、耐受性和安全性:前瞻性、多中心、研究者单盲、随机研究。

Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulfate tablet versus 2 L-polyethylene glycol/ascorbate for bowel preparation in older patients: prospective, multicenter, investigator single-blinded, randomized study.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Republic of Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol. 2024 May;59(5):402-410. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02089-9. Epub 2024 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00535-024-02089-9
PMID:38492010
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulfate tablets (OST, which contains simethicone) and 2 L-polyethylene glycol/ascorbate (2 L-PEG/Asc) with a split-dosing regimen in older individuals aged ≥ 70 years who underwent scheduled colonoscopy.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter study was conducted between June 2022 and October 2023. Participants aged ≥ 70 years were randomized at a ratio of 1:1 to the OST or 2 L-PEG/Asc groups.

RESULTS

In total, 254 patients were evaluated using a modified full analysis set. Successful overall bowel preparation was excellent and similar between the OST and 2 L-PEG/Asc groups for the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) (96.5% vs. 96.6%) and Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS) (96.5% vs. 97.4%). The overall high-quality preparation rate was higher in the OST group than in the 2 L-PEG/Asc group (BBPS: 55.7% vs. 28.4%, P < 0.001; HCS: 66.1% vs. 38.8%, P < 0.001). The overall adenoma detection rate (54.8% vs. 35.3, P = 0.003) was superior in the OST group compared to the 2 L-PEG/Asc group. Tolerability scores, including overall satisfaction, were generally higher in the OST group than in the 2 L-PEG/Asc group. The incidence of major solicited adverse events was comparable between the two groups (55.7% vs. 68.1, P = 0.051), and there were no clinically significant changes in the serum laboratory profiles on the day of or 7 days after colonoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

OST is an effective and safe low-volume agent for colonoscopy, with better tolerance than 2 L-PEG/Asc, in older individuals aged ≥ 70 years.

摘要

背景

我们比较了口服硫酸盐片(OST,含二甲硅油)和 2 L-聚乙二醇/抗坏血酸(2 L-PEG/Asc)与分剂量方案在年龄≥70 岁接受计划结肠镜检查的老年人中的疗效、耐受性和安全性。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、随机、研究者设盲、多中心研究,于 2022 年 6 月至 2023 年 10 月进行。年龄≥70 岁的参与者按 1:1 的比例随机分为 OST 或 2 L-PEG/Asc 组。

结果

共有 254 名患者使用改良全分析集进行评估。在波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)(96.5%对 96.6%)和 Harefield 清洁量表(HCS)(96.5%对 97.4%)方面,OST 和 2 L-PEG/Asc 组的总体肠道准备效果均良好且相似。OST 组的高质量准备率高于 2 L-PEG/Asc 组(BBPS:55.7%对 28.4%,P<0.001;HCS:66.1%对 38.8%,P<0.001)。OST 组的总体腺瘤检出率(54.8%对 35.3%,P=0.003)优于 2 L-PEG/Asc 组。在总体满意度等方面,OST 组的耐受性评分普遍高于 2 L-PEG/Asc 组。两组主要不良事件发生率相当(55.7%对 68.1%,P=0.051),结肠镜检查当天或 7 天后血清实验室指标无临床显著变化。

结论

OST 是一种有效且安全的低容量肠道准备药物,在年龄≥70 岁的老年人中,其耐受性优于 2 L-PEG/Asc。

相似文献

1
Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulfate tablet versus 2 L-polyethylene glycol/ascorbate for bowel preparation in older patients: prospective, multicenter, investigator single-blinded, randomized study.口服硫酸盐片与 2 L 聚乙二醇/抗坏血酸在老年患者肠道准备中的疗效、耐受性和安全性:前瞻性、多中心、研究者单盲、随机研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2024 May;59(5):402-410. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02089-9. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
2
1 L- versus 2 L-polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in elderly patients: a randomized multicenter study.1 L-与 2 L-聚乙二醇联合抗坏血酸在老年患者肠道准备中的应用:一项随机多中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):5724-5733. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08947-4. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
3
Efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral sulphate tablet for bowel preparation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A multicentre randomized controlled study.口服硫酸盐片用于炎症性肠病患者肠道准备的有效性、安全性和耐受性:一项多中心随机对照研究。
J Crohns Colitis. 2022 Nov 23;16(11):1706-1713. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac080.
4
Comparison of a split-dose bowel preparation with 2 liters of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and 1 liter of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and bisacodyl before colonoscopy.结肠镜检查前,对比 2 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 与 1 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 和比沙可啶的分剂量肠道准备。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Aug;86(2):343-348. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.040. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
5
Bowel Preparation Efficacy and Safety of 1 L vs 2 L Polyethylene Glycol With Ascorbic Acid for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.1 L 与 2 L 聚乙二醇联合维生素 C 行结肠镜肠道准备的效果和安全性:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar 1;14(3):e00532. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000532.
6
Efficacy and safety of oral sodium sulfate tablet compared with 1-L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate: a prospective, randomized, endoscopist-blinded trial.口服硫酸钠片与 1 升聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸的疗效和安全性比较:一项前瞻性、随机、内镜医师盲法试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Dec;38(12):2090-2096. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16343. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
7
Efficacy of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate versus 4 L polyethylene glycol in split-dose for colonoscopy cleansing in out and inpatient: A multicentre, randomized trial (OVER 2019).1L 聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸与 4L 聚乙二醇在门诊和住院患者结肠镜检查清洁中的疗效比较:一项多中心、随机试验(OVER 2019)。
Dig Liver Dis. 2024 Mar;56(3):495-501. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.07.032. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
8
Novel 1-L polyethylene glycol + ascorbate versus high-volume polyethylene glycol regimen for colonoscopy cleansing: a multicenter, randomized, phase IV study.新型 1-L 聚乙二醇+抗坏血酸盐与高容量聚乙二醇方案用于结肠镜检查清洁:一项多中心、随机、四期研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Oct;94(4):823-831.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.04.020. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
9
Acute Gastropathy Associated with Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.结肠镜检查前肠道准备相关的急性胃病。
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2024 Aug 25;84(2):82-89. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2024.068.
10
Efficacy and safety of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in elderly: comparison with oral sulfate solution.1L 聚乙二醇联合维生素 C 在老年患者肠道准备中的疗效和安全性:与口服硫酸镁溶液的比较。
Korean J Intern Med. 2023 Sep;38(5):651-660. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.030. Epub 2023 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Recurrent Severe Hyponatremia Following Polyethylene Glycol Electrolyte Lavage Solution with Ascorbic Acid in a Patient with Undiagnosed Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone Secretion.一名患有未确诊抗利尿激素分泌不当综合征的患者在使用含抗坏血酸的聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液后出现复发性严重低钠血症。
Am J Case Rep. 2025 Aug 5;26:e948355. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.948355.
2
Impact of enhanced bowel preparation on complications and prognosis following colonoscopic polypectomy.强化肠道准备对结肠镜下息肉切除术后并发症及预后的影响。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jun 27;17(6):106264. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106264.
3
Efficacy and safety of oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of oral sodium sulfate tablet compared with 1-L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate: a prospective, randomized, endoscopist-blinded trial.口服硫酸钠片与 1 升聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸的疗效和安全性比较:一项前瞻性、随机、内镜医师盲法试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Dec;38(12):2090-2096. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16343. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
2
Comparison of a novel mini-oral sulfate tablet and the conventional oral sulfate tablet in bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter, non-inferior, phase 3 trial.新型口服硫酸片与传统口服硫酸片用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、研究者设盲、多中心、非劣效性3期试验。
J Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov;58(11):1114-1123. doi: 10.1007/s00535-023-02023-5. Epub 2023 Aug 5.
3
口服硫酸溶液与聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
DEN Open. 2025 Apr 16;5(1):e70113. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70113. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Efficacy of Oral Sulfate Tablet and 2 L-Polyethylene Glycol With Ascorbic Acid for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized KASID Multicenter Trial.口服硫酸片剂和含抗坏血酸的2L聚乙二醇用于肠道准备的疗效:一项前瞻性随机KASID多中心试验。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Dec 16;39(48):e301. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e301.
Efficacy of oral sulfate tablets for bowel preparation and adenoma detection rate.口服硫酸片剂用于肠道准备及腺瘤检出率的疗效
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Mar;38(3):410-415. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16079. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
4
Comparison of the efficacy and safety between oral sulfate tablet and polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy according to age.根据年龄比较口服硫酸盐片和聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备的疗效和安全性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 8;101(27):e29884. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029884.
5
Taking Oral Sulfate Tablets with Simethicone for Bowel Preparation Leads to Higher Adenoma Detection Rate than Polyethylene Glycol: A Propensity Score Analysis.服用含西甲硅油的口服硫酸盐片进行肠道准备比服用聚乙二醇导致更高的腺瘤检出率:一项倾向评分分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Mar;68(3):867-876. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07611-8. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
6
Efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral sulphate tablet for bowel preparation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A multicentre randomized controlled study.口服硫酸盐片用于炎症性肠病患者肠道准备的有效性、安全性和耐受性:一项多中心随机对照研究。
J Crohns Colitis. 2022 Nov 23;16(11):1706-1713. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac080.
7
1 L- versus 2 L-polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in elderly patients: a randomized multicenter study.1 L-与 2 L-聚乙二醇联合抗坏血酸在老年患者肠道准备中的应用:一项随机多中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):5724-5733. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08947-4. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
8
Updates on Age to Start and Stop Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations From the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌筛查起始和终止年龄的最新建议:美国多学会结直肠癌工作组的推荐。
Gastroenterology. 2022 Jan;162(1):285-299. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.10.007. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
9
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Strategies to Improve Quality of Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy: Expert Review.AGA 临床实践更新:改善筛查和监测结肠镜检查质量的策略:专家综述。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Aug;161(2):701-711. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.05.041.
10
A Safety and Efficacy Comparison of a New Sulfate-Based Tablet Bowel Preparation Versus a PEG and Ascorbate Comparator in Adult Subjects Undergoing Colonoscopy.一种新型硫酸盐片剂肠道准备与 PEG 和抗坏血酸盐对照剂在接受结肠镜检查的成年受试者中的安全性和疗效比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb 1;116(2):319-328. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001020.