Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, prosthodontics department, El-Zagazig University, Sharqia, Egypt.
Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Removable prosthodontics department, El-Zagazig University, Sharqia, Egypt.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Nov;75(11):4254-4263. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
This research aims to compare the accuracy of different auricular impression techniques used to produce either a mirror image of the unaffected ear or a surgical stent and template for auricular rehabilitation. The research compares two digital ear impression techniques using an Intra-Oral digital Scanner (IOS) (with /without markers) versus a traditional technique using hydrocolloid impression materials.
Eight participants were selected with intact right ears. Patients' right ears were digitally scanned with an IOS, once with resin markers and once without markers. A conventional auricular impression was taken for each participant, which was then scanned using a desktop scanner. The digital IOS technique with markers was set as a reference model. Total 3D deviations between the study groups were calculated using Geomagic control software (software for 3D coordinate measuring technology). An independent sample t-test was used to make comparisons between the two tested groups.
The conventional impression and the intraoral scan without markers recorded a mean of 1.4057 ± 0.3581 and 0.7605±0.1469, respectively, of total 3D deviation from the intraoral scan with markers. There was a significant difference in auricular impression accuracy between conventional and intraoral scans without markers.
Using intraoral scanners facilitates impression acquisition and increases the accuracy compared to traditional hydrocolloid impression techniques, which may affect the shape of tissue due to its liability to be compressed by the impression material. Using markers allows for very precise data collection, reducing stitching complications that affect the accuracy of scans taken without markers.
The proposed technique for auricular digital impression using an intraoral scanner guarantees a fast technique with accurate results in acquiring anatomical data for the rehabilitation of ear defects. This research was registered on clinicaltrials.gov with the following registration number: NCT04893902.
本研究旨在比较用于制作未受影响耳的镜像或耳修复手术支架和模板的不同耳印技术的准确性。本研究比较了两种使用口腔内数字扫描仪(IOS)(带/不带标记)的数字耳印技术与使用水胶体印模材料的传统技术。
选择 8 名右耳完整的参与者。使用 IOS 对每位参与者的右耳进行数字扫描,一次使用树脂标记,一次不使用标记。为每位参与者进行传统的耳印,然后使用台式扫描仪对其进行扫描。带标记的数字 IOS 技术被设定为参考模型。使用 Geomagic 控制软件(用于 3D 坐标测量技术的软件)计算研究组之间的总 3D 偏差。使用独立样本 t 检验对两组测试结果进行比较。
传统印模和无标记的口腔内扫描分别记录了 1.4057 ± 0.3581 和 0.7605 ± 0.1469 的总 3D 偏差平均值。传统印模和无标记的口腔内扫描在耳印准确性方面存在显著差异。
与传统的水胶体印模技术相比,使用口腔内扫描仪进行印模采集更加方便,并且可以提高准确性,因为后者可能会因印模材料的压缩而影响组织的形状。使用标记可以实现非常精确的数据采集,减少无标记扫描中影响准确性的拼接并发症。
使用口腔内扫描仪进行数字化耳印的建议技术保证了一种快速技术,可准确获取用于耳缺损修复的解剖学数据。本研究已在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册,注册号为 NCT04893902。