Suppr超能文献

正颌手术中的计划类型是否会影响患者满意度?

Does the type of planning in orthognathic surgery influence patient satisfaction?

机构信息

University of Texas Southwestern/ Parkland Memorial Hospital Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, CS3.104, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.

出版信息

Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Dec;27(4):685-692. doi: 10.1007/s10006-022-01114-6. Epub 2022 Sep 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine if the method of orthognathic surgery planning used-computer aided surgical simulation (CASS) versus analog model surgery-influenced patients' post-operative satisfaction. The authors hypothesized that there was no difference in patient satisfaction based on the type of planning in orthognathic surgery.

METHODS

This was a single-site, observational, retrospective cohort study consisting of a standardized survey aimed to be given to all patients who had orthognathic surgery at the authors' institution over a 6-year period. Patients were asked to complete a survey questionnaire that consisted of eight questions, each utilizing a five-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

There were 643 patients initially identified with 401 potential subjects meeting the inclusion criteria. Of these 401 patients, the survey was successfully administered to 161. Patients whose orthognathic surgery was planned virtually were not only significantly more likely to be satisfied with their appearance post-operatively, but also more likely to go through with surgery again if they could choose to (p < 0.05). CASS patients were also more likely to identify that their surgery was planned virtually. When stratified by age, younger patients were more likely to have read about CASS. When each survey question was stratified based on the type of surgery that was performed, there were no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Patients whose surgeries were virtually planes were significantly more likely than model surgery patients to be satisfied with their post-operative appearance as well as with their decision to have orthognathic surgery. CASS has proven to be an accurate, time-saving, and potentially cost-saving tool for surgeons. Based on the results of this study, the type of surgical planning method matters for post-operative patient satisfaction with their appearance.

摘要

目的

确定正颌手术规划方法(计算机辅助手术模拟[CASS]与模拟模型手术)是否会影响患者术后满意度。作者假设,基于正颌手术规划类型,患者满意度没有差异。

方法

这是一项单中心、观察性、回顾性队列研究,包括一项针对作者机构 6 年内所有正颌手术患者的标准化调查。患者被要求完成一份调查问卷,其中包含 8 个问题,每个问题都采用 5 点李克特量表。

结果

最初确定了 643 名患者,其中有 401 名潜在患者符合纳入标准。在这 401 名患者中,成功对 161 名患者进行了调查。接受虚拟正颌手术规划的患者不仅术后对自己的外貌更加满意,而且如果可以选择再次手术的话,也更有可能接受手术(p<0.05)。CASS 患者也更有可能表明他们的手术是虚拟规划的。按年龄分层时,年轻患者更有可能了解 CASS。当根据手术类型对每个调查问题进行分层时,没有显著差异。

结论

与模型手术患者相比,接受虚拟规划手术的患者对术后外貌以及接受正颌手术的决定更满意。CASS 已被证明是一种准确、节省时间且可能节省成本的外科医生工具。基于本研究的结果,手术规划方法的类型对患者术后对其外貌的满意度有影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验