Vaandrager Lenneke, Kennedy Lynne
Department of Social Sciences, Health and Society, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
College of Natural and Health Science, Zayed University, United Arab Emirates, and University of Chester, Chester, UK
Communities and neighborhoods have reemerged as important settings for health promotion; they are particularly effective for encouraging social processes which may shape our life-chances and lead to improved health and well-being; consequently, as Scriven and Hodgins, (2012) note, of all the settings (cities, schools, workplaces, universities, etc.), communities are the least well defined. Indeed, within the health literature, they are frequently referred to in terms of place, identity, social entity, or collective action. This chapter on communities and neighborhoods distinguishes between settings as a place (natural and built environment), identity (sense of community), social entity (cohesion, social capital), and collective action (reactive-resilience; proactive-community action) – all meaningful categories of generalized resistance resources (GRRs). Such clearly defined GRR categories would allow the study of their relative importance for developing the sense of coherence (SOC) and a newer concept – setting-specific SOC.
社区和邻里再次成为健康促进的重要场所;它们在鼓励社会进程方面特别有效,这些社会进程可能塑造我们的生活机遇并带来健康和福祉的改善;因此,正如斯克里文和霍金斯(2012年)所指出的,在所有场所(城市、学校、工作场所、大学等)中,社区的定义最不明确。事实上,在健康文献中,它们经常根据地点、身份、社会实体或集体行动来提及。本章关于社区和邻里的内容区分了作为场所(自然和人造环境)、身份(社区感)、社会实体(凝聚力、社会资本)和集体行动(反应性复原力;主动性社区行动)的场所——所有这些都是广义抵抗资源(GRR)的有意义类别。这种明确定义的GRR类别将有助于研究它们对于培养连贯感(SOC)以及一个更新的概念——特定场所的SOC的相对重要性。