• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reduction of pre-procedural anxiety for repeat sessions in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) reduces pain intensity: A prospective observational study.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)重复治疗前减少术前焦虑可降低疼痛强度:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 16;101(37):e30425. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030425.
2
[Evaluation of protocols on the use of analgesics for pain management in patients with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL)].[体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)患者疼痛管理中镇痛药物使用方案的评估]
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Mar 8;32:109. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.32.109.17690. eCollection 2019.
3
The Influence of Pain on the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy.疼痛对体外冲击波碎石术治疗效果的影响。
Curr Urol. 2019 Mar 8;12(2):81-87. doi: 10.1159/000489424.
4
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pancreatic duct stones: an observational study.体外冲击波碎石术治疗胰管结石:一项观察性研究。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct-Nov;53(10-11):1399-1403. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1508611. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
5
A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.非增强计算机断层扫描(NCCT)上肾结石密度 970 亨氏单位(HU)的阈值可改善患者对体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)的选择:来自前瞻性研究的证据。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E438-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10964.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
6
Is There Any Improvement In Efficacy Of Xtracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Therapy For Treating Renal Stones With Invent Of New Shockwave Machines?新型冲击波机器的发明是否提高了体外冲击波碎石疗法治疗肾结石的疗效?
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2019 Jul-Sep;31(3):351-354.
7
Effectiveness of electro-acupuncture compared to sedo-analgesics in relieving pain during shockwave lithotripsy.与镇静镇痛药相比,电针在缓解冲击波碎石术期间疼痛方面的有效性。
Urol Res. 2005 Aug;33(4):285-90. doi: 10.1007/s00240-005-0473-7. Epub 2005 Jun 22.
8
The outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal pelvic stone with and without JJ stent--a comparative study.有或无双J支架的体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾盂结石的疗效——一项对比研究
J Pak Med Assoc. 2009 Mar;59(3):143-6.
9
Outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones according to ESWL intensity.根据体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)强度分析输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术的治疗效果。
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Apr;10(4):1588-1595. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1397.
10
Stenting or not prior to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones? Results of a prospective randomized study.体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石前是否进行支架置入?一项前瞻性随机研究的结果。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Jun;44(3):731-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-011-0062-3. Epub 2011 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of dexamethasone on the EC50 of remifentanil combined with dexmedetomidine achieving analgesia during pancreatic extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: a prospective, randomized and controlled study.地塞米松对胰腺体外冲击波碎石术时瑞芬太尼联合右美托咪定达到镇痛 EC50 的影响:一项前瞻性、随机对照研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Oct 10;24(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02742-z.
2
Effect of acupressure on pain intensity and physiological indices in patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled clinical trial.指压对体外冲击波碎石术患者疼痛强度和生理指标的影响:一项随机双盲假对照临床试验
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024 Jan 25;24(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12906-024-04360-1.

体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)重复治疗前减少术前焦虑可降低疼痛强度:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Reduction of pre-procedural anxiety for repeat sessions in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) reduces pain intensity: A prospective observational study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 16;101(37):e30425. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030425.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000030425
PMID:36123909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9478226/
Abstract

Pain control is a major determinant for successful stone clearance in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for urolithiasis. Pain perception during ESWL may be influenced by patient factors like gender, age, body habitus and anxiety level, and stone related factors like size, laterality and location of stone. We investigated in general, the confounding patient and stone factors influencing pain perception during ESWL with importance given to procedural anxiety in first and the subsequent session of ESWL. This was a prospective observational study of all new consecutive patients who underwent ESWL for a period of 1 year at a tertiary Urological Centre. Demographic and stone anthropometry were analyzed. Pre-procedural anxiety was assessed prior to procedure using hospital anxiety and depression score (HADS) and pain was scored using numerical rating scale-11 at baseline, 30-minutes (i.e., during) and 24 hours after ESWL. Univariate and multivariate analysis for confounding factors included HADs were performed for pain perception. A P value < .05 was considered to be statistically significant. For the study duration, 119 patients were recruited and 72 of them returned for a second session. Procedural anxiety was the only independent factor affecting pain score in ESWL for the first session in multivariate analysis. A statistically significant reduction of mean procedural anxiety score from 6.7 ± 4.5 to 3.2 ± 2.7 (P < .05) for the second ESWL session was observed (n = 72). This was in conjunction with statistical reduction of mean pain score 30 minutes after ESWL from 5.2 ± 2.1 to 4.2 ± 2.1 (P < .05). Patients with HADS ≥ 8 had statistically significant higher mean pain score at all 3 intervals in the first ESWL session. This study has shown that pre-procedural anxiety mainly anticipatory, reduces and shows reduction in pain intensity among patients undergoing repeat ESWL. Hence, anxiety reducing methods should be explored in patients undergoing ESWL to avoid unnecessary analgesic use.

摘要

疼痛控制是体外冲击波碎石术 (ESWL) 治疗尿路结石成功排石的主要决定因素。ESWL 过程中的疼痛感知可能受到患者因素的影响,如性别、年龄、体型和焦虑水平,以及结石相关因素,如结石的大小、侧位和位置。我们总体上研究了影响 ESWL 过程中疼痛感知的混杂患者和结石因素,特别关注首次和后续 ESWL 治疗过程中的程序性焦虑。这是一项在一家三级泌尿科中心进行的为期 1 年的新连续患者前瞻性观察研究。分析了人口统计学和结石人体测量学。使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表 (HADS) 在术前评估术前焦虑,并使用数字评分量表-11 在基线、30 分钟(即期间)和 ESWL 后 24 小时对疼痛进行评分。进行了单变量和多变量分析,以评估 HADS 等混杂因素对疼痛感知的影响。P 值<.05 被认为具有统计学意义。在研究期间,共招募了 119 名患者,其中 72 名患者返回进行第二次治疗。在多变量分析中,程序性焦虑是影响首次 ESWL 治疗疼痛评分的唯一独立因素。在第二次 ESWL 治疗中,观察到平均程序性焦虑评分从 6.7±4.5 显著降低至 3.2±2.7(P<.05)(n=72)。这与 ESWL 后 30 分钟平均疼痛评分从 5.2±2.1 显著降低至 4.2±2.1(P<.05)同时发生。HADS≥8 的患者在首次 ESWL 治疗的所有 3 个间隔的平均疼痛评分均显著较高。这项研究表明,术前焦虑主要是预期性的,可减轻患者在重复 ESWL 治疗过程中的疼痛强度,并减轻疼痛强度。因此,应该在接受 ESWL 治疗的患者中探索减轻焦虑的方法,以避免不必要的镇痛药物使用。