Claveria Oscar, Sorić Petar
AQR-IREA, University of Barcelona, Diagonal, 690, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.
Faculty of Economics & Business, University of Zagreb, Trg Republike Hrvatske 14, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Empir Econ. 2023;64(4):1897-1945. doi: 10.1007/s00181-022-02304-7. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
This paper examines the evolution of labour market uncertainty after the irruption of the COVID-19 pandemic in European countries. Since uncertainty is not directly observable, we use two alternative methods to directly approximate it. Both approaches are based on qualitative expectations elicited form the consumer survey conducted by the European Commission. On the one hand, following (Dibiasi and Iselin in Empir Econ 61:2113-2141, 2021), we use the share of consumers unable to formalise expectations about unemployment (Knightian-type uncertainty). On the other, we use the geometric discrepancy indicator proposed by (Claveria in Empirica 48:483-505, 2021) to quantify the proportion of disagreement in business and consumer expectations. We find that both uncertainty measures covary across the 22 European countries analysed. Although we observe differences in the evolution across countries, in most cases the perception of labour market uncertainty peaked before the outbreak of the crisis, plummeted during the first months of the lockdown, and started rising again. When testing for cointegration with the unemployment rate, we find that both indicators exhibit a long-term relationship with unemployment in most countries. The impact of both indicators on unemployment is characterised by considerable asymmetries, showing a more intense reaction to decreases in the level of labour market uncertainty. While this finding may seem counterintuitive at first sight, it somehow reflects the fact that during recessive periods, the level of disagreement in consumer unemployment expectations drops considerably.
本文考察了新冠疫情在欧洲国家爆发后劳动力市场不确定性的演变。由于不确定性无法直接观测,我们使用两种替代方法来直接对其进行近似估计。这两种方法均基于欧洲委员会开展的消费者调查所引发的定性预期。一方面,遵循(迪比亚西和伊塞林,《实证经济学》,第61卷:2113 - 2141页,2021年),我们使用无法对失业形成正式预期的消费者比例(奈特式不确定性)。另一方面,我们使用(克拉韦里亚,《实证研究》,第48卷:483 - 505页,2021年)提出的几何差异指标来量化企业与消费者预期中的分歧比例。我们发现,在分析的22个欧洲国家中,这两种不确定性测度是共同变化的。尽管我们观察到各国在演变过程中存在差异,但在大多数情况下,劳动力市场不确定性的感知在危机爆发前达到峰值,在封锁的头几个月急剧下降,然后又开始上升。在检验与失业率的协整关系时,我们发现这两个指标在大多数国家都与失业呈现长期关系。这两个指标对失业的影响具有相当大的不对称性,对劳动力市场不确定性水平下降的反应更为强烈。虽然这一发现乍一看可能违反直觉,但它在某种程度上反映了这样一个事实,即在衰退期,消费者对失业预期的分歧程度大幅下降。