Escudero-Castillo Israel, Mato-Díaz Fco Javier, Rodríguez-Alvarez Ana
Department of Applied Economics, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Department of Economics, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Appl Res Qual Life. 2023;18(1):71-91. doi: 10.1007/s11482-022-10113-4. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
In the Spring of 2020, a great number of countries introduced different restrictive measures in order to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic. This article examines the labour market transitions of individuals brought about by some of those measures, and the effect of such transitions on psychological well-being. The fact that it has been possible to distinguish between unemployment transitions before the pandemic began and those resulting from the lockdowns is worth highlighting. Evidence is provided showing that unemployment due to the lockdown had a greater negative impact on psychological well-being than furloughs and teleworking. Gender differences confirm that women experienced greater adverse effects as compared to men. Specifically, women working at home exhibited greater negative effects when compared with those on furlough, probably due to a combination of work disruption and increased family obligations. Finally, on the contrary to men, women living in areas with more rigorous restrictions show a reduced probability of worse PWB when compared to those residing in areas without restrictions. This finding suggests that women are willing to sacrifice freedom of movement as long as restrictions protect their at-risk relatives.
2020年春,许多国家出台了不同的限制措施以应对新冠疫情。本文考察了其中一些措施给个人带来的劳动力市场转变,以及这种转变对心理健康的影响。值得强调的是,能够区分疫情开始前的失业转变和因封锁导致的失业转变。有证据表明,因封锁导致的失业对心理健康的负面影响比休假和远程工作更大。性别差异证实,与男性相比,女性受到的不利影响更大。具体而言,与休假的女性相比,在家工作的女性表现出更大的负面影响,这可能是工作中断和家庭负担增加共同作用的结果。最后,与男性相反,生活在限制措施更严格地区的女性,与生活在无限制地区的女性相比,心理健康状况恶化的可能性降低。这一发现表明,只要限制措施能保护她们有风险的亲属,女性愿意牺牲行动自由。