Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology Duke University School of Medicine Durham NC.
Department of Cardiology The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University Hangzhou China.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Oct 4;11(19):e025257. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025257. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
Background As utilization of clinical exome sequencing (ES) has expanded, criteria for evaluating the diagnostic weight of incidentally identified variants are critical to guide clinicians and researchers. This is particularly important in genes associated with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), which can cause heart failure and sudden death. We sought to compare the frequency and distribution of incidentally identified variants in DCM-associated genes between a clinical referral cohort with those in control and known case cohorts to determine the likelihood of pathogenicity among those undergoing genetic testing for non-DCM indications. Methods and Results A total of 39 rare, non- DCM-associated genes were identified and evaluated from a clinical ES testing referral cohort (n=14 005, Baylor Genetic Laboratories) and compared with a DCM case cohort (n=9442) as well as a control cohort of population variants (n=141 456) derived from the gnomAD database. Variant frequencies in each cohort were compared. Signal-to-noise ratios were calculated comparing the DCM and ES cohort with the gnomAD cohort. The likely pathogenic/pathogenic variant yield in the DCM cohort (8.2%) was significantly higher than in the ES cohort (1.9%). Based on signal-to-noise and correlation analysis, incidental variants found in , , , , , , and had the greatest chance of being DCM-associated. Conclusions The distribution of pathogenic variants between the ES cohort and the DCM case cohort was gene specific, and variants found in the ES cohort were similar to variants found in the control cohort. Incidentally identified variants in specific genes are more associated with DCM than others.
随着临床外显子组测序(ES)的应用不断扩大,对于偶然发现的变异体的诊断权重评估标准对于指导临床医生和研究人员至关重要。这在与扩张型心肌病(DCM)相关的基因中尤为重要,因为这些基因可能导致心力衰竭和猝死。我们试图比较 DCM 相关基因中偶然发现的变异体在临床转诊队列与对照和已知病例队列中的频率和分布,以确定在进行非 DCM 指征的基因检测中那些变异体具有致病性的可能性。
我们从临床 ES 检测转诊队列(n=14005,Baylor Genetic Laboratories)中确定并评估了 39 个罕见的非 DCM 相关基因,并将其与 DCM 病例队列(n=9442)以及 gnomAD 数据库中的人群变异体对照队列(n=141456)进行了比较。比较了每个队列中的变异体频率。通过比较 DCM 和 ES 队列与 gnomAD 队列,计算了信噪比。DCM 队列(8.2%)中可能的致病性/致病性变异体的发生率明显高于 ES 队列(1.9%)。基于信号与噪声和相关分析,发现 、 、 、 、 、 和 中的偶然变异体最有可能与 DCM 相关。
ES 队列和 DCM 病例队列之间致病性变异体的分布是特定基因特异性的,并且在 ES 队列中发现的变异体与对照队列中发现的变异体相似。在特定基因中偶然发现的变异体与 DCM 的相关性更高。