Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science and Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Demography. 2022 Oct 1;59(5):1843-1871. doi: 10.1215/00703370-10218779.
As with many social transfer schemes, pension systems around the world are often progressive: individuals with lower incomes receive a higher percentage of their income as a subsequent pension. On the other hand, those with lower earnings have higher mortality and thus accumulate fewer years of pension income. Both of these opposing factors influence the progressiveness of pension systems. Empirical efforts to disentangle the effects of mortality inequality on lifetime pension inequality have been scarce. Using Swedish taxation data linked with death registers for 1970-2018, we study how education and preretirement earnings relate to lifetime pensions from age 60 onward and how mortality inequalities contribute to overall inequalities in lifetime pensions. The results show that a progressive replacement structure and mortality differences contribute to the overall distribution of pension payments over the life course. Up to one quarter of lifetime pension inequality is attributable to the greater longevity of socially advantaged groups-particularly among men. Hence, mortality inequalities are an important determinant of the overall degree of between-group income transfers in a pension system, but they are not as important as inequalities in prior earnings.
与许多社会转移计划一样,世界各地的养老金制度通常是累进的:收入较低的人作为后续养老金获得其收入的更高比例。另一方面,那些收入较低的人死亡率更高,因此积累的养老金收入年限更少。这两个相反的因素都会影响养老金制度的累进性。从经验上厘清死亡率不平等对终身养老金不平等的影响的努力很少。本文利用瑞典税收数据与 1970-2018 年的死亡登记数据相联系,研究了教育和退休前收入如何与 60 岁及以上的终身养老金相关,以及死亡率不平等如何导致终身养老金的总体不平等。结果表明,渐进的替代结构和死亡率差异导致了整个生命周期中养老金支付的总体分布。终身养老金不平等的四分之一归因于社会优势群体(尤其是男性)的寿命更长。因此,死亡率不平等是养老金制度中群体间收入转移总体程度的一个重要决定因素,但不如前期收入不平等重要。