• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管癌手术后并发症和再入院的经济负担。

Economic burden of complications and readmission following oesophageal cancer surgery.

作者信息

Browning Alison F, Chong Lynn, Read Matthew, Hii Michael W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Hepatobiliary and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2022 Nov;92(11):2901-2906. doi: 10.1111/ans.18062. Epub 2022 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1111/ans.18062
PMID:36129457
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal cancer is the seventh most prevalent malignancy globally, and the sixth most common cause of cancer-related death. Oesophageal cancer is also one of the most costly cancers to treat. The aim of this study was to assess the financial impact of post-operative morbidity and hospital readmissions following oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on a prospectively maintained database of patients with oesophageal cancer who underwent an oesophagectomy at a single centre between July 2014 and June 2019 (N = 56). Readmission costs were also assessed in this cohort for 12 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

The total median cost for oesophagectomy in this cohort was AU$57 250. Major complications occurred in 40% of patients, with a median total admission cost of AU$74 606, significantly higher than patients with either minor or no complications (median admission cost of AU$52 713, P < 0.001). Patients whose operation was complicated by an anastomotic leak had a higher median admission cost than those without a leak (AU$104 328 and AU$54 972 respectively, P < 0.001). Cost centres representing the greatest proportion of costs were theatre resources and surgical ward care (medical and nursing). A total of 110 readmissions in 25 patients were recorded in the 12 months post-operatively, the majority for gastroscopy and dilatation of anastomotic stricture.

CONCLUSION

Post-oesophagectomy morbidity greatly increases cost of care. In addition to the clinical benefits, interventions to minimize post-operative complications are likely to result in substantial cost savings.

摘要

背景

食管癌是全球第七大常见恶性肿瘤,也是癌症相关死亡的第六大常见原因。食管癌也是治疗成本最高的癌症之一。本研究的目的是评估食管癌食管切除术后并发症和再次入院的经济影响。

方法

对2014年7月至2019年6月在单一中心接受食管切除术的食管癌患者前瞻性维护数据库进行回顾性分析(N = 56)。还对该队列术后12个月的再入院费用进行了评估。

结果

该队列中食管切除术的总中位费用为57250澳元。40%的患者发生了主要并发症,总入院中位费用为74606澳元,显著高于轻度或无并发症患者(入院中位费用为52713澳元,P < 0.001)。手术并发吻合口漏的患者入院中位费用高于无漏患者(分别为104328澳元和54972澳元,P < 0.001)。占成本比例最大的成本中心是手术室资源和外科病房护理(医疗和护理)。术后12个月共记录了25例患者的110次再入院,大多数是因为胃镜检查和吻合口狭窄扩张。

结论

食管切除术后的并发症大大增加了护理成本。除了临床益处外,尽量减少术后并发症的干预措施可能会大幅节省成本。

相似文献

1
Economic burden of complications and readmission following oesophageal cancer surgery.食管癌手术后并发症和再入院的经济负担。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Nov;92(11):2901-2906. doi: 10.1111/ans.18062. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
2
Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.腹腔镜与开放经裂孔食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 31;3(3):CD011390. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011390.pub2.
3
Management of oesophageal anastomosis dehiscence after oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.食管癌食管切除术后食管吻合口裂开的处理
Rozhl Chir. 2020 Spring;99(5):200-206. doi: 10.33699/PIS.2020.99.5.200-206.
4
An alternative postoperative pathway reduces length of hospitalisation following oesophagectomy.一种替代的术后途径可减少食管癌手术后的住院时间。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Apr;37(4):807-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.09.034. Epub 2009 Nov 8.
5
Readiness for hospital discharge and its association with post-discharge outcomes among oesophageal cancer patients after oesophagectomy: A prospective observational study.食管癌患者术后出院准备情况及其与出院后结局的关系:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Oct;33(10):3969-3978. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17055. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
6
Population-based study of anastomotic stricture rates after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy for cancer.基于人群的研究:微创与开放性食管癌切除术术后吻合口狭窄发生率。
BJS Open. 2019 Jun 10;3(5):634-640. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50176. eCollection 2019 Oct.
7
Is low serum albumin associated with postoperative complications in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal malignancies?血清白蛋白水平低与接受食管癌切除术治疗食管恶性肿瘤的患者术后并发症有关吗?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Jan;20(1):107-13. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu324. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
8
Planned oesophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy versus salvage oesophagectomy following definitive chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.化疗放疗后计划行食管切除术与根治性化疗放疗后挽救性食管切除术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
ANZ J Surg. 2023 Apr;93(4):829-839. doi: 10.1111/ans.18225. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
9
Completely minimally invasive versus hybrid Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy for oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional cancer: a UK multi-centre comparative study.完全微创与杂交 Ivor-Lewis 食管切除术治疗食管和胃食管交界部癌:一项英国多中心对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):5822-5832. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09043-x. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
10
Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.微创与开放手术治疗食管癌的疗效比较:一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照临床试验。
Lancet. 2012 May 19;379(9829):1887-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9. Epub 2012 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
ASO Author Reflections: Step-Count During Hospitalization Reveals Postoperative Risk-Predicting Readmission After Esophagectomy.ASO作者反思:住院期间的步数揭示了食管癌切除术后再入院的术后风险预测情况。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Sep 1. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18230-8.
2
Postoperative Step Count Predicts Unplanned Readmission After Radical Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.术后步数可预测食管癌根治术后的非计划再入院:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18133-8.
3
Phase Angle and Ultrasound Assessment of the Rectus Femoris for Predicting Malnutrition and Sarcopenia in Patients with Esophagogastric Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.
股直肌的相位角和超声评估对预测食管癌胃癌患者营养不良和肌肉减少症的作用:一项横断面初步研究
Nutrients. 2024 Dec 29;17(1):91. doi: 10.3390/nu17010091.
4
Factors influencing the cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus with low-grade dysplasia in Australia.影响澳大利亚巴雷特食管伴低级别异型增生患者射频消融术成本效益的因素。
Dis Esophagus. 2025 Jan 7;38(1). doi: 10.1093/dote/doae095.
5
Early diagnosis of esophageal cancer: How to put "early detection" into effect?食管癌的早期诊断:如何将“早期检测”付诸实践?
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Aug 15;16(8):3386-3392. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i8.3386.
6
Cost burden following esophagectomy: A single centre observational study.食管癌切除术后的费用负担:一项单中心观察性研究。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jul 27;16(7):2255-2269. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2255.
7
Relation between frailty and adverse outcomes in elderly patients with gastric cancer: a scoping review.老年胃癌患者的衰弱与不良结局之间的关系:一项范围综述
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Feb 9;86(3):1590-1600. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001817. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
Right gastroepiploic artery length determined anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a prospective cohort study.右胃网膜动脉长度与微创食管癌根治术后吻合口漏的关系:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):2757-2764. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001181.
9
Textbook outcomes after oesophagectomy: a single-centre observational study.食管切除术的教科书结局:单中心观察性研究。
BMC Surg. 2023 Dec 8;23(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02253-7.
10
Effects of unimodal or multimodal prehabilitation on patients undergoing surgery for esophagogastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单一模式或多模式术前康复对行食管胃交界癌手术患者的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Dec 7;32(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08229-w.