Buchholz Vered, Lee Dong Kyu, Liu David S, Aly Ahmad, Barnett Stephen A, Hazard Riley, Le Peter, Kioussis Benjamin, Muralidharan Vijayaragavan, Weinberg Laurence
Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Seoul 14566, Goyang, South Korea.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jul 27;16(7):2255-2269. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2255.
Cost analyses of patients undergoing esophagectomy is valuable for identifying modifiable expenditure drivers to target and curtail costs while improving the quality of care. We aimed to define the cost-complication relationship after esophagectomy and delineate the incremental contributions to costs.
To assess the relationship between the hospital costs and potential cost drivers post esophagectomy and investigate the relationship between the cost-driving variables (predicting variables) and hospital costs (dependent variable).
In this retrospective single center study, the severity of complications was graded using the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification system. Key esophagectomy complications were categorized and defined according to consensus guidelines. Raw costing data included the in-hospital costs of the index admission and any unplanned admission within 30 postoperative days. We used correlation analysis to assess the relationship between key clinical variables and hospital costs (in United States dollars) to identify cost drivers. A mediation model was used to investigate the relationship between these variables and hospital costs.
A total of 110 patients underwent primary esophageal resection. The median admission cost was $47822.7 (interquartile range: 35670.2-68214.0). The total effects on costs were $13593.9 (95%CI: 10187.1-17000.8, < 0.001) for each increase in CD severity grade, $4781 (95%CI: 3772.7-5789.3, < 0.001) for each increase in the number of complications, and $42552.2 (95%CI: 8309-76795.4, = 0.015) if a key esophagectomy complication developed. Key esophagectomy complications drove the costs directly by $11415.7 (95%CI: 992.5-21838.9, = 0.032).
The severity and number of complications, and the development of key esophagectomy complications significantly contributed to total hospital costs. Continuous institutional initiatives and strategies are needed to enhance patient outcomes and minimize costs.
对接受食管切除术的患者进行成本分析,对于确定可改变的支出驱动因素以进行针对性控制并降低成本,同时提高护理质量具有重要价值。我们旨在明确食管切除术后的成本 - 并发症关系,并描述对成本的增量贡献。
评估食管切除术后医院成本与潜在成本驱动因素之间的关系,并研究成本驱动变量(预测变量)与医院成本(因变量)之间的关系。
在这项回顾性单中心研究中,使用Clavien - Dindo(CD)分类系统对并发症的严重程度进行分级。关键食管切除术后并发症根据共识指南进行分类和定义。原始成本数据包括首次住院的院内成本以及术后30天内的任何计划外住院成本。我们使用相关分析来评估关键临床变量与医院成本(以美元计)之间的关系,以确定成本驱动因素。采用中介模型来研究这些变量与医院成本之间的关系。
共有110例患者接受了原发性食管切除术。住院成本中位数为47822.7美元(四分位间距:35670.2 - 68214.0美元)。CD严重程度等级每增加一级,对成本的总影响为13593.9美元(95%置信区间:10187.1 - 17000.8美元,P < 0.001);并发症数量每增加一个,对成本的总影响为4781美元(95%置信区间:3772.7 - 5789.3美元,P < 0.001);如果发生关键食管切除术后并发症,对成本的总影响为42552.2美元(95%置信区间:8309 - 76795.4美元,P = 0.015)。关键食管切除术后并发症直接使成本增加11415.7美元(95%置信区间:992.5 - 21838.9美元,P = 0.032)。
并发症的严重程度和数量以及关键食管切除术后并发症的发生显著增加了医院总成本。需要持续的机构举措和策略来改善患者预后并降低成本。