Laboratory for Earth Surface Process, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
National Engineering Research Center of New Energy Power Generation, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China.
Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Oct 4;56(19):13622-13633. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c03000. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
Nitroaromatic compounds (NACs) not only are strongly absorbing chromophores but also adversely affect human health. NACs can be emitted from incomplete combustions and can derive secondarily through photochemical reactions. Here, emission experiments were conducted for 31 fuel-stove combinations to elucidate variations in, and influencing factors of, NAC emission factors (EF) and to explore potential tracers for different combustion sources. EF varied by 2 orders of magnitude among different combinations. Differences in fuel type contributed more than the stove difference to the observed variation. EF for biomass pellets was approximately 66% lower than that for raw biomass, although the bulk organic and brown carbon EFs were 95% lower. 2-Nitro-1-naphthol was the most abundant individual compound, followed by 4-nitrocatechol, while acid compounds (salicylic acid and benzoic acid) were low in abundance (<1%). Substantially different profiles were observed between coal and biomass burning emissions. Biomass burning had more single-ring-based phenolic compounds with more 4-nitrocatechol, while in coal combustion, more two-ring products were produced. This study demonstrated much lower ratios of 2-nitro-1-naphthol/4-nitrocatechol for biomass in both traditional (2.0 ± 3.5) and improved stoves (3.0 ± 2.1) than for coals (15 ± 6). Coal and biomass burning differed in not only EF but also compound profile, consequently leading to distinct health and climate impacts; moreover, the ratio of 2-nitro-1-naphthol/4-nitrocatechol may be used in source apportionment of NACs.
硝基芳香族化合物(NACs)不仅是强烈的吸收色团,而且对人体健康有不利影响。NACs 可以从不完全燃烧中排放出来,并可以通过光化学反应次生而来。在这里,进行了 31 种燃料炉组合的排放实验,以阐明 NAC 排放因子(EF)的变化及其影响因素,并探索不同燃烧源的潜在示踪剂。不同组合之间的 EF 差异达两个数量级。燃料类型的差异对观察到的变化的贡献大于炉子的差异。生物质颗粒的 EF 比原始生物质低约 66%,尽管有机和棕色碳 EF 低 95%。2-硝基-1-萘酚是最丰富的单个化合物,其次是 4-硝基邻苯二酚,而酸类化合物(水杨酸和苯甲酸)含量较低(<1%)。煤和生物质燃烧排放之间观察到的情况明显不同。生物质燃烧排放的多环酚类化合物含有更多的 4-硝基邻苯二酚,而在煤燃烧中,产生了更多的双环产物。本研究表明,在传统(2.0±3.5)和改进型炉灶(3.0±2.1)中,生物质的 2-硝基-1-萘酚/4-硝基邻苯二酚比值均明显低于煤(15±6)。煤和生物质燃烧不仅在 EF 方面有所不同,而且在化合物谱方面也有所不同,因此对健康和气候的影响也不同;此外,2-硝基-1-萘酚/4-硝基邻苯二酚的比值可用于 NAC 源分配。