Wu Xiujuan, Zhang Zhen, Zhu Jian, Lu Sheng, Chen Chen, Wu Xianglei, Wang Xue, Zhao Zongfeng
Department of Dermatology, Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital, Zhongshan-Xuhui Hospital, Fudan University, No. 966, Huaihai Middale Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Department of Dermatology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 639, Manufacturing Bureau Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Oct;12(10):2371-2382. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00807-w. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
Facial cosmetic conditions can manifest as post-inflammatory erythema, scars, pigmentation, enlarged pores, skin laxity, and photoaging. The microneedle fractional radiofrequency system (MFRS) is a new device that combines radiofrequency and microneedles and has been widely used for skin rejuvenation. Since MFRS is an invasive technique, this study aimed to evaluate whether the skin barrier functions might be impaired by this treatment, revealed by skin sensitivity and exacerbation of melasma.
Twenty patients with Fitzpatrick grades III-IV facial conditions (skin laxity with melasma, n = 9; post-inflammatory erythema and scars, n = 5; and enlarged pores, n = 6) and treated with MFRS were enrolled. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL, using Ultrascan UC22), skin sensitivity (ten-item Sensitive Scale, SS-10), melanin index (MI), melasma area and severity index (MASI), red areas (VISIA), and thickness and density of the epidermis and dermis on ultrasonography were compared between baseline and 6 months after all treatment sessions.
Twenty patients completed a 6-month follow-up after two MFRS treatments. During days 1-3 post-treatment, the TEWL values gradually increased to the peak and decreased to baseline levels (BD) on day 7. There was no significant difference in TEWL compared with baseline in month (M) 1, M3, and M6. There were no significant changes in the thickness and density of the epidermis. Although the thickness and density of the dermis increased, there was no significant difference compared to baseline. There was no significant difference in the MI, MASI, and SS-10 score before and after MFRS treatment. After treatment with MFRS, the red area and scarring reduced significantly (p < .01), and no significant difference was observed in other patients.
MFRS is a safe and effective treatment for facial cosmetic conditions. The skin barrier function is not impaired by MFRS treatment, since it does not cause skin sensitivity or melasma exacerbation.
面部美容问题可表现为炎症后红斑、疤痕、色素沉着、毛孔粗大、皮肤松弛和光老化。微针分数射频系统(MFRS)是一种将射频和微针相结合的新型设备,已广泛用于皮肤年轻化。由于MFRS是一种侵入性技术,本研究旨在评估这种治疗是否会损害皮肤屏障功能,通过皮肤敏感性和黄褐斑加重来揭示。
招募了20例面部状况为Fitzpatrick III-IV级(皮肤松弛伴黄褐斑,n = 9;炎症后红斑和疤痕,n = 5;毛孔粗大,n = 6)并接受MFRS治疗的患者。在所有治疗疗程的基线和6个月后,比较经表皮水分流失(TEWL,使用Ultrascan UC22)、皮肤敏感性(十项敏感量表,SS-10)、黑色素指数(MI)、黄褐斑面积和严重程度指数(MASI)、红色区域(VISIA)以及超声检查中表皮和真皮的厚度和密度。
20例患者在接受两次MFRS治疗后完成了6个月的随访。治疗后第1-3天,TEWL值逐渐升高至峰值,并在第7天降至基线水平(BD)。在第1个月、第3个月和第6个月,TEWL与基线相比无显著差异。表皮的厚度和密度没有显著变化。虽然真皮的厚度和密度增加,但与基线相比无显著差异。MFRS治疗前后的MI、MASI和SS-10评分无显著差异。MFRS治疗后,红色区域和疤痕明显减少(p < 0.01),其他患者未观察到显著差异。
MFRS是一种治疗面部美容问题的安全有效方法。MFRS治疗不会损害皮肤屏障功能,因为它不会引起皮肤敏感性或黄褐斑加重。