Norton Children's Hospital, Louisville, Kentucky.
Hiram C. Polk, Jr Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky.
JAMA Surg. 2022 Nov 1;157(11):1042-1049. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.4303.
Mature trauma systems are critical in building and maintaining national, state, and local resilience against all-hazard disasters. Currently, pediatric state trauma system plans are not standardized and thus are without concrete measures of potential effectiveness.
To develop objective measures of pediatric trauma system capability at the state level, hypothesizing significant variation in capabilities between states, and to provide a contemporary report on the status of national pediatric trauma system planning and development.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A national survey was deployed in 2018 to perform a gap analysis of state pediatric trauma system capabilities. Four officials from each state were asked to complete the survey regarding extensive pediatric-related or specific trauma system parameters. Using these parameters, a panel of 14 individuals representing national stakeholder sectors in pediatric trauma care convened to identify the essential components of the ideal pediatric trauma system using Delphi methodology. Data analysis was conducted from March 16, 2019, to February 23, 2020.
Based on results from the national survey and consensus panel parameters, each state was given a composite score. The score was validated using US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) fatal injury database.
The national survey had less than 10% missing data. The consensus panel reached agreement on 6 major domains of pediatric trauma systems (disaster, legislation/funding, access to care, injury prevention/recognition, quality improvement, pediatric readiness) and was used to develop the Pediatric Trauma System Assessment Score (PTSAS) based on 100 points. There was substantial variation across states, with state scores ranging from 48.5 to 100. Based on US CDC WONDER data, for every 1-point increase in PTSAS, there was a 0.12 per 100 000 decrease in mortality (95% CI, -0.22 to -0.02; P = .03).
Results of this cross-sectional study suggest that a more robust pediatric trauma system has a significant association with pediatric injury mortality. This study assessed the national landscape of capability and preparedness to provide pediatric trauma care at the state level. These parameters can tailor the maturation of children's interests within a state trauma system and assist with future state, regional, and national planning.
成熟的创伤系统对于建立和维护国家、州和地方对所有灾害的弹性至关重要。目前,儿科州创伤系统计划没有标准化,因此没有具体的潜在效果衡量标准。
在州一级制定客观的儿科创伤系统能力衡量标准,假设各州之间的能力存在显著差异,并提供关于国家儿科创伤系统规划和发展现状的当代报告。
设计、地点和参与者:2018 年进行了一项全国性调查,以对州儿科创伤系统能力进行差距分析。每个州有 4 名官员被要求完成调查,内容涉及广泛的儿科相关或特定创伤系统参数。使用这些参数,由代表儿科创伤护理国家利益相关者部门的 14 名个人组成的小组使用 Delphi 方法确定理想儿科创伤系统的基本组成部分。数据分析于 2019 年 3 月 16 日至 2020 年 2 月 23 日进行。
根据全国性调查和共识小组参数的结果,每个州都获得了一个综合分数。该分数使用美国疾病控制与预防中心广泛在线数据进行了验证。流行病学研究(CDC WONDER)致命伤害数据库。
全国性调查的缺失数据不足 10%。共识小组就儿科创伤系统的 6 个主要领域(灾难、立法/资金、获得护理、伤害预防/识别、质量改进、儿科准备)达成一致,并根据 100 分制定了儿科创伤系统评估评分(PTSAS)。各州之间存在很大差异,州得分从 48.5 到 100 不等。根据美国疾病控制与预防中心的 WONDER 数据,PTSAS 每增加 1 分,死亡率每 10 万人减少 0.12 人(95%CI,-0.22 至-0.02;P = .03)。
这项横断面研究的结果表明,更强大的儿科创伤系统与儿科伤害死亡率之间存在显著关联。本研究评估了国家一级提供儿科创伤护理的能力和准备情况。这些参数可以调整州创伤系统内儿童利益的成熟度,并有助于未来的州、地区和国家规划。