Suppr超能文献

指定的创伤系统能改善治疗结果吗?

Do designated trauma systems improve outcome?

作者信息

Lansink Koen W W, Leenen Luke P H

机构信息

Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007 Dec;13(6):686-90. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282f1e7a4.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Trauma systems are introduced world wide with the goal to improve survival and outcome of the injured patient. This review is focused on the influence of trauma systems on the survival and outcome of injured patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Large population-based studies have been published over the last 2 years strengthening the hypothesis that trauma systems indeed improve survival rates in injured patients. Mortality was reduced by 15-25% when severely injured patients were treated at a trauma center. Although 'inclusive' trauma systems have been advocated since 1991 only recently did the first population-based study prove that 'inclusive' trauma systems do better than 'exclusive' trauma systems. Because further improvements in survival in mature trauma systems are likely to be small, more focus should be given to quality of life studies, rather than to survival in trauma system evaluation.

SUMMARY

Trauma systems indeed improve survival rates in injured patients. Inclusive trauma systems do better than exclusive trauma systems. More attention should be given to quality of outcome.

摘要

综述目的

创伤系统在全球范围内被引入,目的是提高受伤患者的生存率和治疗效果。本综述聚焦于创伤系统对受伤患者生存率和治疗效果的影响。

最新发现

在过去两年中发表了大量基于人群的研究,强化了创伤系统确实能提高受伤患者生存率的假说。当重伤患者在创伤中心接受治疗时,死亡率降低了15%至25%。尽管自1991年以来就一直倡导“包容性”创伤系统,但直到最近才有第一项基于人群的研究证明“包容性”创伤系统比“排他性”创伤系统效果更好。由于成熟创伤系统在生存率方面的进一步改善可能很小,因此在创伤系统评估中应更多关注生活质量研究,而非生存率。

总结

创伤系统确实能提高受伤患者的生存率。包容性创伤系统比排他性创伤系统效果更好。应更多关注治疗效果的质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验