• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

洛沙平与奋乃静治疗精神病患者的疗效比较。一项双盲、随机、多中心试验。

Loxapine versus perphenazine in psychotic patients. A double-blind, randomized, multicentre trial.

作者信息

Fruensgaard K, Wollenberg J, Hansen K M, Fensbo C, Sihm F

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 1978;5(8):601-7. doi: 10.1185/03007997809110194.

DOI:10.1185/03007997809110194
PMID:361345
Abstract

A double-blind, randomized, multicentre trial was carried out in 47 psychotic patients to evaluate the efficacy of oral treatment with loxapine compared with perphenazine. In total, 22 patients were included in diagnostic Group I (cases of acute schizophrenia and psychogenic (reactive) psychoses). The average maximum daily dose was 60.0 mg in the loxapine group and 36.8 mg in the perphenazine group. After 3-weeks' treatment, no significant differences were found between the two treatment groups according to the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale or side-effect records. Twenty-five patients were included in diagnostic Group II (cases of chronic schizophrenia). The average daily dosage was 81.1 mg in the loxapine group and 90.1 mg in the perphenazine group. After 10 to 12-weeks' treatment, no significant differences between the two treatment groups could be found according to BPRS, CGI scale, Nurses' Observation Scale for In-patient Evaluation (NOSIE) or side-effect records. The diastolic blood pressure (lying and standing) tended to increase slightly in both treatment groups. In conclusion, it was found that loxapine and perphenazine seemed to be equally effective and, based on experience with parenteral loxapine treatment, it is suggested that further investigation of oral loxapine should be carried out in psychotic patients in whom agitation is a feature.

摘要

对47名精神病患者进行了一项双盲、随机、多中心试验,以评估洛沙平口服治疗与奋乃静相比的疗效。总共22名患者被纳入诊断组I(急性精神分裂症和心因性(反应性)精神病病例)。洛沙平组的平均最大日剂量为60.0毫克,奋乃静组为36.8毫克。治疗3周后,根据简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)、临床总体印象(CGI)量表或副作用记录,两个治疗组之间未发现显著差异。25名患者被纳入诊断组II(慢性精神分裂症病例)。洛沙平组的平均日剂量为81.1毫克,奋乃静组为90.1毫克。治疗10至12周后,根据BPRS、CGI量表、护士住院患者评估观察量表(NOSIE)或副作用记录,两个治疗组之间未发现显著差异。两个治疗组的舒张压(卧位和立位)均有轻微升高趋势。总之,发现洛沙平和奋乃静似乎同样有效,并且根据非肠道洛沙平治疗的经验,建议对有激动症状的精神病患者进行口服洛沙平的进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Loxapine versus perphenazine in psychotic patients. A double-blind, randomized, multicentre trial.洛沙平与奋乃静治疗精神病患者的疗效比较。一项双盲、随机、多中心试验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 1978;5(8):601-7. doi: 10.1185/03007997809110194.
2
A double-blind comparative trial of loxapine and trifluoperazine in acute and chronic schizophrenic patients.洛沙平与三氟拉嗪治疗急慢性精神分裂症患者的双盲对照试验。
J Int Med Res. 1976;4(6):441-8. doi: 10.1177/030006057600400611.
3
Loxapine succinate: a controlled double-blind study in chronic schizophrenia.琥珀酸洛沙平:一项针对慢性精神分裂症的对照双盲研究。
Dis Nerv Syst. 1975 Jul;36(7):361-4.
4
A double-blind comparison of loxapine succinate and trifluoperazine in newly admitted schizophrenic patients.新入院精神分裂症患者中琥珀酸洛沙平与三氟拉嗪的双盲对照研究。
J Clin Pharmacol. 1976 Jan;16(1):60-5. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1976.tb01492.x.
5
Loxapine versus thioridazine in the treatment of organic psychosis.洛沙平与硫利达嗪治疗器质性精神病的比较。
J Int Med Res. 1980;8(1):22-30. doi: 10.1177/030006058000800104.
6
Loxapine versus haloperidol parenterally in acute psychosis with agitation. A double-blind study.洛沙平与氟哌啶醇治疗伴有激越的急性精神病的肠外给药对比研究。一项双盲研究。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1977 Oct;56(4):256-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1977.tb00226.x.
7
[Statistical analysis of the activity of loxapine and thioridazine in a double-blind study].[氯氮平和硫利达嗪活性的双盲研究统计分析]
Encephale. 1975;1(2):147-60.
8
Acutely ill schizophrenic patients treated with loxapine. A clinical study in a community mental health center.用洛沙平治疗的急性病精神分裂症患者。在社区心理健康中心的一项临床研究。
Clin Ther. 1980;3(4):242-9.
9
Efficacy and safety of loxapine for inhalation in the treatment of agitation in patients with schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.洛沙平吸入剂治疗精神分裂症患者激越的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;72(10):1313-21. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06011yel.
10
Evaluation of loxapine hydrochloride oral concentrate (loxitane C) in acute schizophrenia.盐酸洛沙平口服浓缩液(氯氮平C)治疗急性精神分裂症的评估。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1978 Feb;39(2):154-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisiting loxapine: a systematic review.再探洛沙平:一项系统评价
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2015 Apr 1;14:15. doi: 10.1186/s12991-015-0053-3. eCollection 2015.
2
Perphenazine for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的奋乃静。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 6;2015(3):CD003443. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003443.pub3.
3
Alternative delivery systems for agents to treat acute agitation: progress to date.治疗急性激越的药物的替代给药系统:最新进展。
Drugs. 2013 Nov;73(16):1783-92. doi: 10.1007/s40265-013-0130-3.
4
Loxapine for schizophrenia.洛沙平用于治疗精神分裂症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD001943. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001943.pub2.