Fruensgaard K, Wollenberg J, Hansen K M, Fensbo C, Sihm F
Curr Med Res Opin. 1978;5(8):601-7. doi: 10.1185/03007997809110194.
A double-blind, randomized, multicentre trial was carried out in 47 psychotic patients to evaluate the efficacy of oral treatment with loxapine compared with perphenazine. In total, 22 patients were included in diagnostic Group I (cases of acute schizophrenia and psychogenic (reactive) psychoses). The average maximum daily dose was 60.0 mg in the loxapine group and 36.8 mg in the perphenazine group. After 3-weeks' treatment, no significant differences were found between the two treatment groups according to the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale or side-effect records. Twenty-five patients were included in diagnostic Group II (cases of chronic schizophrenia). The average daily dosage was 81.1 mg in the loxapine group and 90.1 mg in the perphenazine group. After 10 to 12-weeks' treatment, no significant differences between the two treatment groups could be found according to BPRS, CGI scale, Nurses' Observation Scale for In-patient Evaluation (NOSIE) or side-effect records. The diastolic blood pressure (lying and standing) tended to increase slightly in both treatment groups. In conclusion, it was found that loxapine and perphenazine seemed to be equally effective and, based on experience with parenteral loxapine treatment, it is suggested that further investigation of oral loxapine should be carried out in psychotic patients in whom agitation is a feature.
对47名精神病患者进行了一项双盲、随机、多中心试验,以评估洛沙平口服治疗与奋乃静相比的疗效。总共22名患者被纳入诊断组I(急性精神分裂症和心因性(反应性)精神病病例)。洛沙平组的平均最大日剂量为60.0毫克,奋乃静组为36.8毫克。治疗3周后,根据简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)、临床总体印象(CGI)量表或副作用记录,两个治疗组之间未发现显著差异。25名患者被纳入诊断组II(慢性精神分裂症病例)。洛沙平组的平均日剂量为81.1毫克,奋乃静组为90.1毫克。治疗10至12周后,根据BPRS、CGI量表、护士住院患者评估观察量表(NOSIE)或副作用记录,两个治疗组之间未发现显著差异。两个治疗组的舒张压(卧位和立位)均有轻微升高趋势。总之,发现洛沙平和奋乃静似乎同样有效,并且根据非肠道洛沙平治疗的经验,建议对有激动症状的精神病患者进行口服洛沙平的进一步研究。