Cunningham J N, Laschinger J C, Spencer F C
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987 Aug;94(2):275-85.
Thirty-three patients undergoing operations on the descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta were monitored to evaluate causes and effects of spinal cord ischemia as manifested by changes in somatosensory evoked potentials. Maintenance of distal aortic perfusion pressure (greater than 60 mm Hg) by either shunt or bypass techniques in 17 patients resulted in preservation of somatosensory evoked potentials and a normal postoperative neurologic status, irrespective of the interval of thoracic cross-clamping (range 23 to 105 minutes). In 16 other patients in whom cross-clamp time ranged from 16 to 124 minutes, evoked potential loss was observed because of failure to provide distal perfusion (n = 8), inadequate maintenance of distal perfusion pressure (less than 60 mm Hg) despite shunt/bypass (n = 6), or interruption of critical intercostal arteries (n = 2). Incidence of paraplegia in the entire group was 15.1% (5/33) and was limited to only those patients in whom evoked potential loss occurred (5/16, 31.2%) (p = 0.02). Loss of somatosensory evoked potentials for more than 30 minutes resulted in a 71.2% (5/7) incidence of paraplegia, whereas no neurologic deficit was noted in patients (0/26) in whom evoked potential loss was either prevented or limited in duration to 30 minutes (p less than 0.001 versus loss for more than 30 minutes). Intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials is a sensitive indicator of spinal cord ischemia. Simple aortic cross-clamping, failure to maintain distal perfusion pressure above 60 mm Hg, and inability to reimplant critical intercostals in a timely fashion result in a high rate of paraplegia if duration of spinal cord ischemia as measured by somatosensory evoked potentials exceeds 30 minutes. Routine evoked potential monitoring during thoracoabdominal procedures appears useful in assessing the adequacy of spinal cord perfusion. Furthermore, it can alert the surgeon to the necessity for critical intercostal artery reimplantation as well as the need for adjustment or regulation of distal aortic perfusion.
对33例接受胸降主动脉或胸腹主动脉手术的患者进行监测,以评估体感诱发电位变化所显示的脊髓缺血的原因和影响。17例患者通过分流或旁路技术维持远端主动脉灌注压(大于60 mmHg),结果体感诱发电位得以保留,术后神经功能状态正常,无论胸段主动脉阻断时间长短(范围为23至105分钟)。在其他16例患者中,阻断时间为16至124分钟,由于未提供远端灌注(n = 8)、尽管采用分流/旁路技术但远端灌注压维持不足(小于60 mmHg)(n = 6)或关键肋间动脉中断(n = 2),观察到诱发电位丧失。整个组的截瘫发生率为15.1%(5/33),且仅限于那些诱发电位丧失的患者(5/16,31.2%)(p = 0.02)。体感诱发电位丧失超过30分钟导致截瘫发生率为71.2%(5/7),而在诱发电位丧失得到预防或持续时间限制在30分钟以内的患者中(0/26)未发现神经功能缺损(与丧失超过30分钟相比,p < 0.001)。术中监测体感诱发电位是脊髓缺血的敏感指标。如果通过体感诱发电位测量的脊髓缺血持续时间超过30分钟,单纯的主动脉阻断、未能将远端灌注压维持在60 mmHg以上以及未能及时重新植入关键肋间动脉会导致高截瘫发生率。在胸腹手术过程中进行常规诱发电位监测似乎有助于评估脊髓灌注是否充足。此外,它可以提醒外科医生有必要重新植入关键肋间动脉以及调整或调节远端主动脉灌注。