Suppr超能文献

用于检测哥伦比亚博亚卡省通哈市呼吸道样本中新型冠状病毒的四种实时聚合酶链反应检测方法的比较

Comparison of Four Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Respiratory Samples from Tunja, Boyacá, Colombia.

作者信息

Salamanca-Neita Lorenzo H, Carvajal Óscar, Carvajal Juan Pablo, Forero-Castro Maribel, Segura Nidya Alexandra

机构信息

Laboratorio Carvajal IPS, SAS, Tunja 150003, Colombia.

Facultad de Ciencias, Grupo de Investigación en Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Tunja 150003, Colombia.

出版信息

Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 10;7(9):240. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed7090240.

Abstract

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. In Colombia, many commercial methods are now available to perform the RT-qPCR assays, and laboratories must evaluate their diagnostic accuracy to ensure reliable results for patients suspected of being positive for COVID-19. The purpose of this study was to compare four commercial RT-qPCR assays with respect to their ability to detect the SARS-CoV2 virus from nasopharyngeal swab samples referred to Laboratorio Carvajal IPS, SAS in Tunja, Boyacá, Colombia. We utilized 152 respiratory tract samples (Nasopharyngeal Swabs) from patients suspected of having SARS-CoV-2. The diagnostic accuracy of GeneFinder COVID-19 Plus RealAmp (In Vitro Diagnostics) (GF-TM), One-Step Real-Time RT-PCR (Vitro Master Diagnostica) (O-S RT-qPCR), and the Berlin modified protocol (BM) were assessed using the gold-standard Berlin protocol (Berlin Charité Probe One-Step RT-qPCR Kit, New England Biolabs) (BR) as a reference. Operational characteristics were estimated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, agreement, and predictive values. Using the gold-standard BR as a reference, the sensitivity/specificity of the diagnostic tests was found to be 100%/92.7% for GF-TM, 92.75%/67.47% for O-S RT-qPCR, and 100%/96.39% for the BM protocol. Using BR as a reference, the sensitivity/specificity for the diagnostic tests were found to be 100%/92.7% for the GF-TM assay, 92.72%/67.47% for the O-S RT-qPCR, and 100%/96.39% for BM. Relative to the BR reference protocol, the GF-TM and BM RT-PCR assays obtained similar results (k = 0.92 and k = 0.96, respectively), whereas the results obtained by O-S-RT-qPCR were only moderately similar. We conclude that the GF-TM and BM protocols offer the best sensitivity and specificity, with similar results in comparison to the gold-standard BR protocol. We recommend evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of the OS-RT-qPCR protocol in future studies with a larger number of samples.

摘要

冠状病毒病(COVID-19)是一种由严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)引起的传染病。在哥伦比亚,现在有许多商业方法可用于进行逆转录定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)检测,实验室必须评估其诊断准确性,以确保为疑似COVID-19阳性的患者提供可靠结果。本研究的目的是比较四种商业RT-qPCR检测方法从提交给哥伦比亚博亚卡省通哈市卡瓦哈尔IPS实验室(Laboratorio Carvajal IPS, SAS)的鼻咽拭子样本中检测SARS-CoV2病毒的能力。我们使用了152份疑似感染SARS-CoV-2患者的呼吸道样本(鼻咽拭子)。以金标准柏林方案(柏林夏里特探针一步法RT-qPCR试剂盒,新英格兰生物实验室)(BR)作为参考,评估GeneFinder COVID-19 Plus RealAmp(体外诊断)(GF-TM)、一步法实时RT-PCR(Vitro Master Diagnostica)(O-S RT-qPCR)和柏林改良方案(BM)的诊断准确性。从灵敏度、特异性、一致性和预测值方面估计操作特征。以金标准BR作为参考,发现诊断检测的灵敏度/特异性对于GF-TM为100%/92.7%,对于O-S RT-qPCR为92.75%/67.47%,对于BM方案为100%/96.39%。以BR作为参考,发现诊断检测的灵敏度/特异性对于GF-TM检测为100%/92.7%,对于O-S RT-qPCR为92.72%/67.47%,对于BM为100%/96.39%。相对于BR参考方案,GF-TM和BM RT-PCR检测获得了相似的结果(分别为k = 0.92和k = 0.96),而O-S-RT-qPCR获得的结果只是中等相似。我们得出结论,GF-TM和BM方案具有最佳的灵敏度和特异性,与金标准BR方案相比结果相似。我们建议在未来有更多样本的研究中评估OS-RT-qPCR方案的诊断准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3586/9506173/4d8f942134e1/tropicalmed-07-00240-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验